Education Exhibit - Continuing Medical Education

Imaging the Endometrium: Disease and Normal Variants

The endometrium demonstrates a wide spectrum of normal and pathologic appearances throughout menarche as well as during the prepubertal and postmenopausal years and the first trimester of pregnancy. Disease entities include hydrocolpos, hydrometrocolpos, and ovarian cysts in pediatric patients; gestational trophoblastic disease during pregnancy; endometritis and retained products of conception in the postpartum period; and bleeding caused by polyps, submucosal fibroids, endometrial hyperplasia, or endometrial adenocarcinoma. Other findings include tamoxifen-associated changes, intrauterine fluid collections, and endometrial adhesions. Although ultrasound (US) is almost always the first modality used in the radiologic work-up of endometrial disease, findings at sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography are often correlated with US findings. It is important to understand that the appearance of the endometrium is related to multiple factors, including the patient’s age, stage in the menstrual cycle, and pregnancy status and whether she has undergone hormonal replacement therapy or tamoxifen therapy. Accurate diagnosis requires that these factors be taken into account in addition to clinical history and physical examination findings.


  • 1 Siegel MJ, Surratt JT. Pediatric gynecologic imaging. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1992; 19:103-127. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ali GM, Kordorff R, Franke D. Ultrasound volumetry in hematometrocolpos. J Clin Ultrasound 1989; 17:257-259. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sailer JF. Hematometra and hematocolpos: ultrasound findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979; 132:1010-1011. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hall DA, Yoder IC. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterus. In: Callen PW, eds. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1994; 586-614. Google Scholar
  • 5 Fleischer AC. Sonographic assessment of endometrial disorders. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1999; 20:259-266. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nyberg DA, Hill LM. Normal early intrauterine pregnancy: sonographic development and HCG correlation. In: Patterson AS, eds. Transvaginal ultrasound. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1992; 64-85. Google Scholar
  • 7 Fossum GT, Davagan V, Kletzky OA. Early detection of pregnancy with transvaginal US. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:788-791. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kurtz AB, Middleton WD. First trimester ultrasound. In: Thrall JH, eds. Ultrasound: the requisites. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1996; 191-206. Google Scholar
  • 9 Yeh HC, Goodman JD, Carr L, et al. Intradecidual sign: a US criterion of early intrauterine pregnancy. Radiology 1986; 161:463-467. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bradley WG, Fiske CE, Filly RA. The double sac sign of early intrauterine pregnancy: use in exclusion of ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 1982; 143:223-226. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schaffer RM, Stein K, Shih YH, et al. The echoic pseudogestational sac of ectopic pregnancy simulating early intrauterine pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 1983; 2:215-218. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cacciatore B, Titinen A, Stenman UH, Ylostalo P. Normal early pregnancy: serum hCG levels and vaginal ultrasonography findings. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97:899-903. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Levi CS, Lyons EA, Zheng XH. Endovaginal US: demonstration of cardiac activity in embryos of less than 5 mm in crown rump length. Radiology 1990; 176:71-74. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dillon EH, Feyock AL, Taylor KJ. Pseudogestational sacs: Doppler US differentiation from normal or abnormal intrauterine pregnancies. Radiology 1990; 176:359-364. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lavery JP, Gadwood KA. Postpartum ultrasonography. In: Callen PW, eds. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1994; 509-519. Google Scholar
  • 16 Wachsberg R, Kurtz A. Gas within the endometrial cavity at postpartum US: a normal finding after spontaneous vaginal delivery. Radiology 1992; 183:431-433. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lipinski JK, Adam AH. Ultrasonic prediction of complications following normal vaginal delivery. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9:17-19. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 DePalma R, Leveno Identification and management of women at high risk for pelvic infection following cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55:185S-192S. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lee CY, Madrazo B, Drukker BH. Ultrasonic evaluation of the postpartum uterus in the management of postpartum bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 58:227-232. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hertzberg B, Bowie J. Ultrasound of the postpartum uterus: prediction of retained placental tissue. J Ultrasound Med 1991; 10:451-456. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zuckerman J, Levine D, McNicholas , et al. Imaging of pelvic postpartum complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:663-668. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Levine D, Gosink BB, Johnson LA. Change in endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women undergoing hormone replacement therapy. Radiology 1995; 197:603-608. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Tsuda H, Kawabata M, Kawabata K, et al. Improvement of diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for identification of endometrial malignancies by using cutoff level of endometrial thickness based on length of time since menopause. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 64:35-37. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Zalud I, Conway C, Schulman H, et al. Endometrial and myometrial thickness and uterine blood flow in postmenopausal women: the influence of hormonal replacement therapy and age. J Ultrasound Med 1993; 12:737-741. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Goldstein SR, Nachtigall M, Snyder JR, et al. Endometrial assessment by vaginal ultrasonography before endometrial sampling in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:119-123. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Granberg S, Wikland M, Karlsson B, et al. Endometrial thickness as measured by endovaginal ultrasonography for identifying endometrial abnormality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164:47-52. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ferrazzi E, Torri V, Trio D, et al. Sonographic endometrial thickness: a useful test to predict atrophy in patients with postmenopausal bleeding—an Italian multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7:315-321. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gull B, Karlsson B, Milsom I, et al. Transvaginal sonography of the endometrium in a representative sample of postmenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7:322-327. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cullinan JA, Fleischer AC, Kepple DM, et al. Sonohysterography: a technique for endometrial evaluation. RadioGraphics 1995; 15:501-514. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Dubinsky TJ, Parvey HR, Gormaz G, et al. Transvaginal hysterosonography in the evaluation of small endoluminal masses. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:1-6. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hulka CA, Hall DA, McCarthy K, et al. Endometrial polyps, hyperplasia, and carcinoma in postmenopausal women: differentiation with endovaginal sonography. Radiology 1994; 191:755-758. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sohaey R, Woodward P. Sonohysterography: technique, endometrial findings, and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1999; 20:250-258. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Cicinelli E, Romano F, Anastasio PS, et al. Transabdominal sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of submucous myomas. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85:42-47. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lev-Toaff AS, Toaff ME, Liu JB, et al. Value of sonohysterography in the diagnosis and management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Radiology 1996; 201:179-184. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kurman RJ, Kaminski P. The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia: a long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer 1985; 56:403-412. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Malpani A, Singer J, Wolverson MK, et al. Endometrial hyperplasia: value of endometrial thickness in ultrasonographic diagnosis and clinical significance. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18:173-177. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Fleischer AC. Transvaginal sonography of endometrial disorders: an overview. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:923-930. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bourne TH, Campbell S, Steer CV, et al. Detection of endometrial cancer by transvaginal ultrasonography with color flow imaging and blood flow analysis: a preliminary report. Gynecol Oncol 1991; 40:253-259. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Nayfield SG, Karp JE, Ford LG, et al. Potential role of tamoxifen in prevention of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991; 83:1450-1459. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40 De Muylder X, Neven P, De Somer M, et al. Endometrial lesions in patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991; 36:127-130. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Goldstein SR. Unusual ultrasonographic appearance of the uterus in patients receiving tamoxifen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:447-451. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hann LE, Giess CS, Bach AM, et al. Endometrial thickness in tamoxifen-treated patients: correlation with clinical and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:657-661. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Ascher SM, Johnson JC, Barnes WA, et al. MR imaging appearance of the uterus in postmenopausal women receiving tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer: histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996; 200:105-110. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Goldstein SR. Postmenopausal endometrial fluid collections revisited: look at the doughnut rather than the hole. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:738-740. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Carlson JA, Jr, Arger P, Thompson S, et al. Clinical and pathologic correlation of endometrial cavity fluid detected by ultrasound in the postmenopausal patient. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77:119-123. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Breckenridge JW, Kurtz AB, Ritchie WG, et al. Postmenopausal uterine fluid collection: indicator of carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 139:529-534. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 47 McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Kopans DB, et al. Postmenopausal endometrial fluid collections: always an indicator of malignancy? J Ultrasound Med 1986; 5:647-649. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Nov 2001