"skipMainNavigation"
closeDrawerMenuopenDrawerMenu
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH

    Transient Part-Solid Nodules Detected at Screening Thin-Section CT for Lung Cancer: Comparison with Persistent Part-Solid Nodules

    Published Online:Mar 10 2010https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090547

    Abstract

    Young patient age, detection of part-solid nodules (PSNs) at follow-up, blood eosinophilia, lesion multiplicity, large solid lesion portion, and an ill-defined lesion border were found to be independent predictors of transient PSNs.

    Purpose

    To retrospectively investigate clinical and computed tomographic (CT) features of transient part-solid nodules (PSNs) initially detected at screening thin-section CT for lung cancer and to determine predictive factors that may differentiate transient PSNs from persistent PSNs.

    Materials and Methods

    This study was approved by the institutional review board. From January 2006 to August 2008, 93 individuals with 126 PSNs were identified from among 16777 individuals who underwent chest CT. Clinical features and CT characteristics of PSNs were reviewed, and clinical and thin-section CT features were compared between transient and persistent PSNs. To identify predictive factors of transient PSNs and evaluate predictive performance, logistic regression analysis and C statistic analysis were performed.

    Results

    Eighty-eight (69.8%) of 126 PSNs were transient. Between transient and persistent PSNs, there were significant differences (P < .05) in patient age, patient sex, risk of lung cancer, presence of eosinophilia, mode of detection, lesion size, lesion multiplicity, size of solid portion, and lesion border. Multivariate analysis revealed that young patient age, detection of the lesion at follow-up, blood eosinophilia, lesion multiplicity, large solid portion, and ill-defined border were significant (P < .05) independent predictors of transient PSNs. The performance in the discrimination of transient PSNs from persistent PSNs of the logistic regression model that incorporated both clinical and thin-section CT features was significantly higher than the performance of the models that incorporated clinical features or thin-section CT features alone.

    Conclusion

    A substantial proportion of PSNs detected at screening CT were transient. Transient PSNs could be predicted with high accuracy by using the features of young patient age, detection of the PSN at follow-up, blood eosinophilia, lesion multiplicity, large solid portion, and ill-defined lesion border.

    © RSNA, 2010

    References

    • 1 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al.. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999;354(9173):99–105. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 2 Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, et al.. Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 1996;201(3):798–802. Link, Google Scholar
    • 3 Tsubamoto M, Kuriyama K, Kido S, et al.. Detection of lung cancer on chest radiographs: analysis on the basis of size and extent of ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT. Radiology 2002;224(1):139–144. Link, Google Scholar
    • 4 Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(5):1053–1057. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 5 Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Lee CH, Chun EJ, Im JG. Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. RadioGraphics 2007;27(2):391–408. Link, Google Scholar
    • 6 Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KS, Han J, Yi CA, Kim YK. Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons. Radiology 2007;245(1):267–275. Link, Google Scholar
    • 7 Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, et al.. Focal interstitial fibrosis manifesting as nodular ground-glass opacity: thin-section CT findings. Eur Radiol 2007;17(9):2325–2331. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 8 Lee HJ, Goo JM, Lee CH, Yoo CG, Kim YT, Im JG. Nodular ground-glass opacities on thin-section CT: size change during follow-up and pathological results. Korean J Radiol 2007;8(1):22–31. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 9 Nakata M, Saeki H, Takata I, et al.. Focal ground-glass opacity detected by low-dose helical CT. Chest 2002;121(5):1464–1467. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 10 Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, et al.. CT findings of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia in the lung. Korean J Radiol 2006;7(2):80–86. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 11 New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project Investigators. CT Screening for lung cancer: diagnoses resulting from the New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project. Radiology 2007;243(1):239–249. Link, Google Scholar
    • 12 Oh JY, Kwon SY, Yoon HI, et al.. Clinical significance of a solitary ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesion of the lung detected by chest CT. Lung Cancer 2007;55(1):67–73. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 13 Sone S, Li F, Yang ZG, et al.. Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. Br J Cancer 2001;84(1):25–32. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Minami H, Yoshimura M, Miyamoto Y, Matsuoka H, Tsubota N. Lung cancer in women: sex-associated differences in survival of patients undergoing resection for lung cancer. Chest 2000;118(6):1603–1609. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 15 Radzikowska E, Głaz P, Roszkowski K. Lung cancer in women: age, smoking, histology, performance status, stage, initial treatment and survival. Population-based study of 20 561 cases. Ann Oncol 2002;13(7):1087–1093. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 16 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143(1):29–36. Link, Google Scholar
    • 17 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148(3):839–843. Link, Google Scholar
    • 18 Li F, Sone S, Abe H, Macmahon H, Doi K. Malignant versus benign nodules at CT screening for lung cancer: comparison of thin-section CT findings. Radiology 2004;233(3):793–798. Link, Google Scholar
    • 19 Ohtsuka T, Watanabe K, Kaji M, Naruke T, Suemasu K. A clinicopathological study of resected pulmonary nodules with focal pure ground-glass opacity. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30(1):160–163. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 20 Jang HJ, Lee KS, Kwon OJ, Rhee CH, Shim YM, Han J. Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: focal area of ground-glass attenuation at thin-section CT as an early sign. Radiology 1996;199(2):485–488. Link, Google Scholar
    • 21 Libby DM, Wu N, Lee IJ, et al.. CT screening for lung cancer: the value of short-term CT follow-up. Chest 2006;129(4):1039–1042. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 22 Kim HY, Naidich DP, Lim KY, et al.. Transient pulmonary eosinophilia incidentally found on low-dose computed tomography: findings in 40 individuals. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008;32(1):101–107. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 23 Attili AK, Kazerooni EA, Gross BH, Flaherty KR, Myers JL, Martinez FJ. Smoking-related interstitial lung disease: radiologic-clinical-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2008;28(5):1383–1396; discussion 1396–1398. Link, Google Scholar
    • 24 Hasegawa M, Sone S, Takashima S, et al.. Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol 2000;73(876):1252–1259. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 25 Lindell RM, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, et al.. Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers. Radiology 2007;242(2):555–562. Link, Google Scholar
    • 26 Aoki T, Nakata H, Watanabe H, et al.. Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174(3):763–768. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Received March 29, 2009; revision requested May 18; revision received July 29; accepted September 19; final version accepted November 16.
    Published online: Mar 10 2010
    Published in print: Apr 2010