Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules: Increase in Mass as an Early Indicator of Growth

References

• 1 Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1053–1057.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 2 Hasegawa M, Sone S, Takashima S, et al.. Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol 2000;73:1252–1259.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 3 Noguchi M, Morikawa A, Kawasaki M, et al.. Small adenocarcinoma of the lung: histologic characteristics and prognosis. Cancer 1995;75:2844–2852.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 4 Nakajima R, Yokose T, Kakinuma R, Nagai K, Nishiwaki Y, Ochiai A. Localized pure ground-glass opacity on high-resolution CT: histologic characteristics. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:323–329.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 5 Nakata M, Sawada S, Saeki H, et al.. Prospective study of thoracoscopic limited resection for ground-glass opacity selected by computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1601–1605.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 6 Suzuki K, Asamura H, Kusumoto M, Kondo H, Tsuchiya R. “Early” peripheral lung cancer: prognostic significance of ground glass opacity on thin-section computed tomographic scan. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1635–1639.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 7 Seki N, Sawada S, Nakata M, et al.. Lung cancer with localized ground-glass attenuation represents early-stage adenocarcinoma in nonsmokers. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3:483–490.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 8 Aoki T, Nakata H, Watanabe H, et al.. Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:763–768.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 9 Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, Kaneko M, et al.. Progression of focal pure ground-glass opacity detected by low-dose helical computed tomography screening for lung cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:17–23.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 10 Lindell RM, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, et al.. Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers. Radiology 2007;242:555–562.
  Google Scholar
• 11 Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H, et al.. Natural history of pure ground-glass opacity after long-term follow-up of more than 2 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:386–392.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 12 Yang ZG, Sone S, Takashima S, et al.. High-resolution CT analysis of small peripheral lung adenocarcinomas revealed on screening helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1399–1407.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 13 Lee HJ, Goo JM, Lee CH, Yoo CG, Kim YT, Im JG. Nodular ground-glass opacities on thin-section CT: size change during follow-up and pathological results. Korean J Radiol 2007;8:22–31.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 14 Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Kohl G, Rummeny E, Engelke C. Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol 2006;16:781–790.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 15 Mull RT. Mass estimates by computed tomography: physical density from CT numbers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:1101–1104.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 16 Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H, et al.. Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 2006;54:177–184.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 17 van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, et al.. Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer 2007;120:868–874.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 18 Gietema HA, Schilham AM, van Ginneken B, van Klaveren RJ, Lammers JW, Prokop M. Monitoring of smoking-induced emphysema with CT in a lung cancer screening setting: detection of real increase in extent of emphysema. Radiology 2007;244:890–897.
  Google Scholar
• 19 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–310.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 20 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135–160.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 21 Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37–46.
  Google Scholar
• 22 Hong C, Bae KT, Pilgram TK. Coronary artery calcium: accuracy and reproducibility of measurements with multi-detector row CT—assessment of effects of different thresholds and quantification methods. Radiology 2003;227:795–801.
  Google Scholar
• 23 Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable?. Radiology 2004;231:453–458.
  Google Scholar
• 24 Marten K, Engelke C. Computer-aided detection and automated CT volumetry of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 2007;17:888–901.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 25 Sumikawa H, Johkoh T, Nagareda T, et al.. Pulmonary adenocarcinomas with ground-glass attenuation on thin-section CT: quantification by three-dimensional image analyzing method. Eur J Radiol 2008;65:104–111.
  Medline Google Scholar