Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Four-dimensional MR Evaluation of Ascending Aortic Systolic Flow Patterns

References

• 1 Ward C. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 2000;83(1):81–85.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 2 Hahn RT, Roman MJ, Mogtader AH, Devereux RB. Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19(2):283–288.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 3 Keane MG, Wiegers SE, Plappert T, Pochettino A, Bavaria JE, Sutton MG. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation 2000;102(19suppl 3):III35–III39.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 4 Nistri S, Sorbo MD, Marin M, Palisi M, Scognamiglio R, Thiene G. Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. Heart 1999;82(1):19–22.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 5 Bonderman D, Gharehbaghi-Schnell E, Wollenek G, Maurer G, Baumgartner H, Lang IM. Mechanisms underlying aortic dilatation in congenital aortic valve malformation. Circulation 1999;99(16):2138–2143.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 6 Fedak PWM, Verma S, David TE, Leask RL, Weisel RD, Butany J. Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 2002;106(8):900–904.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 7 Niwa K, Perloff JK, Bhuta SM, et al.. Structural abnormalities of great arterial walls in congenital heart disease: light and electron microscopic analyses. Circulation 2001;103(3):393–400.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 8 Nkomo VT, Enriquez-Sarano M, Ammash NM, et al.. Bicuspid aortic valve associated with aortic dilatation: a community-based study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23(2):351–356.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 9 Bauer M, Siniawski H, Pasic M, Schaumann B, Hetzer R. Different hemodynamic stress of the ascending aorta wall in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. J Card Surg 2006;21(3):218–220.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 10 Bauer M, Gliech V, Siniawski H, Hetzer R. Configuration of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve disease undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without reduction aortoplasty. J Heart Valve Dis 2006;15(5):594–600.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 11 Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, Byers PH, Otto CM. Usefulness of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype to predict elastic properties of the ascending aorta. Am J Cardiol 2007;99(5):686–690.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 12 Fazel SS, Mallidi HR, Lee RS, et al.. The aortopathy of bicuspid aortic valve disease has distinctive patterns and usually involves the transverse aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135(4):901–907.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 13 Kilner PJ, Yang GZ, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation 1993;88(5 Pt 1):2235–2247.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 14 Klipstein RH, Firmin DN, Underwood SR, Rees RS, Longmore DB. Blood flow patterns in the human aorta studied by magnetic resonance. Br Heart J 1987;58(4):316–323.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 15 Bogren HG, Klipstein RH, Firmin DN, et al.. Quantitation of antegrade and retrograde blood flow in the human aorta by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Am Heart J 1989;117(6):1214–1222.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 16 Fogel MA, Weinberg PM, Haselgrove J. Nonuniform flow dynamics in the aorta of normal children: a simplified approach to measurement using magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15(6):672–678.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 17 Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD, et al.. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28(4):459–468.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 18 Hope TA, Markl M, Wigström L, Alley MT, Miller DC, Herfkens RJ. Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26(6):1471–1479.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 19 Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT, et al.. Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17(4):499–506.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 20 Bammer R, Hope TA, Aksoy M, Alley MT. Time-resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;57(1):127–140.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 21 Bernstein MA, Zhou XJ, Polzin JA, et al.. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn Reson Med 1998;39(2):300–308.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 22 Markl M, Bammer R, Alley MT, et al.. Generalized reconstruction of phase contrast MRI: analysis and correction of the effect of gradient field distortions. Magn Reson Med 2003;50(4):791–801.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 23 Walker PG, Cranney GB, Scheidegger MB, Waseleski G, Pohost GM, Yoganathan AP. Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3(3):521–530.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 24 Napel S, Lee DH, Frayne R, Rutt BK. Visualizing three-dimensional flow with simulated streamlines and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2(2):143–153.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 25 Anderson JD. Computational fluid dynamics New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
  Google Scholar
• 26 Gleeson TG, Mwangi I, Horgan SJ, Cradock A, Fitzpatrick P, Murray JG. Steady-state free-precession (SSFP) cine MRI in distinguishing normal and bicuspid aortic valves. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28(4):873–878.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 27 Kersting-Sommerhoff BA, Sechtem UP, Schiller NB, Lipton MJ, Higgins CB. MR imaging of the thoracic aorta in Marfan patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11(4):633–639.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 28 Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, O’Loughlin J. Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol 1989;64(8):507–512.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 29 Bireley WR, Diniz LO, Groves EM, Dill K, Carroll TJ, Carr JC. Orthogonal measurement of thoracic aorta luminal diameter using ECG-gated high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26(6):1480–1485.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 30 Ferencik M, Pape LA. Changes in size of ascending aorta and aortic valve function with time in patients with congenitally bicuspid aortic valves. Am J Cardiol 2003;92(1):43–46.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 31 Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, et al.. The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart 2008;94(12):1634–1638.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 32 Thanassoulis G, Yip JW, Filion K, et al.. Retrospective study to identify predictors of the presence and rapid progression of aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008;5(12):821–828.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 33 Russo CF, Cannata A, Lanfranconi M, Vitali E, Garatti A, Bonacina E. Is aortic wall degeneration related to bicuspid aortic valve anatomy in patients with valvular disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136(4):937–942.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 34 Fernandes SM, Khairy P, Sanders SP, Colan SD. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and interventions in the young. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(22):2211–2214.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 35 Ciotti GR, Vlahos AP, Silverman NH. Morphology and function of the bicuspid aortic valve with and without coarctation of the aorta in the young. Am J Cardiol 2006;98(8):1096–1102.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 36 Markl M, Harloff A, Föll D, Langer M, Hennig J, Frydrychowicz A. Sclerotic aortic valve: flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reveals 3 distinct flow-pattern changes. Circulation 2007;116(10):e336–e337.
  Medline Google Scholar