Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091479

The maximum standardized uptake value ratio is an accurate imaging biomarker for differentiating tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma from physiologic uptake in the tonsils.

Purpose

To quantify fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the palatine tonsils to identify a sensitive and specific metric for distinguishing physiologic asymmetric uptake from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Materials and Methods

This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was approved by institutional review board. Informed consent requirements were waived. Twenty-six patients (seven female, 19 male; mean age, 53.46 years ± 10.45 [standard deviation]) with tonsillar SCC were included. Twenty-six patients (seven female, 19 male; mean age, 61.77 years ± 10.12) with head and neck carcinomas not involving the tonsils were included as control subjects. Tonsil standardized uptake values (SUVs) were measured bilaterally in each group. Independent-samples t test was used to compare mean SUVs, and Pearson correlation was used to evaluate association of FDG uptake between tonsils within control subjects.

Results

The mean maximum SUV (SUVmax) of tonsil tumors was 9.36 ± 4.54, which was significantly higher than that of contralateral cancer-free tonsils (2.54 ± 0.88; P < .0001) and tonsils in control subjects (2.98 ± 1.08; P < .0001). In patients with tonsillar cancer, the mean difference in SUVmax between tonsils was 10.43 ± 7.07, which was significantly greater than that in control subjects (0.62 ± 0.54; P < .0001). The mean SUVmax ratio between tonsils in patients with carcinoma was 3.79 ± 1.69, which was threefold higher than in control subjects (1.18 ± 0.13; P < .0001). For receiver operating characteristic analysis using SUVmax ratio to differentiate benign uptake from SCC, the area under the curve was 1.00 (95% confidence interval: 1.00, 1.00). A cutoff ratio of 1.48 had 100% sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion

The SUVmax ratio represents an accurate imaging biomarker for differentiating tonsillar SCC from physiologic 18F-FDG uptake.

© RSNA, 2010

References

  • 1 Allal AS , Dulguerov P , Allaoua M , et al. . Standardized uptake value of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in predicting outcome in head and neck carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(5):1398–1404.
  • 2 Kitagawa Y , Sadato N , Azuma H , et al. . FDG PET to evaluate combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy of head and neck neoplasms. J Nucl Med 1999;40(7):1132–1137.
  • 3 Oshida M , Uno K , Suzuki M , et al. . Predicting the prognoses of breast carcinoma patients with positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-fluoro[18F]-D-glucose. Cancer 1998;82(11):2227–2234.
  • 4 Vansteenkiste JF , Stroobants SG , Dupont PJ , et al. . Leuven Lung Cancer Group . Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis of 125 cases. J Clin Oncol 1999;17(10):3201–3206.
  • 5 Slevin NJ , Collins CD , Hastings DL , et al. . The diagnostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) with radiolabelled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in head and neck cancer. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113(6):548–554.
  • 6 Nakamoto Y , Tatsumi M , Hammoud D , Cohade C , Osman MM , Wahl RL . Normal FDG distribution patterns in the head and neck: PET/CT evaluation. Radiology 2005;234(3):879–885.
  • 7 Bakheet SM , Powe J . Benign causes of 18-FDG uptake on whole body imaging. Semin Nucl Med 1998;28(4):352–358.
  • 8 Kostakoglu L , Goldsmith SJ . PET in the assessment of therapy response in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck and of the esophagus. J Nucl Med 2004;45(1):56–68.
  • 9 Rosenbaum SJ , Lind T , Antoch G , Bockisch A . False-positive FDG PET uptake—the role of PET/CT. Eur Radiol 2006;16(5):1054–1065.
  • 10 Sugawara Y , Braun DK , Kison PV , Russo JE , Zasadny KR , Wahl RL . Rapid detection of human infections with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25(9):1238–1243.
  • 11 Kawabe J , Okamura T , Shakudo M , et al. . Two cases of chronic tonsillitis studied by FDG-PET. Ann Nucl Med 1999;13(4):277–279.
  • 12 Kawabe J , Okamura T , Shakudo M , et al. . Physiological FDG uptake in the palatine tonsils. Ann Nucl Med 2001;15(3):297–300.
  • 13 Jabour BA , Choi Y , Hoh CK , et al. . Extracranial head and neck: PET imaging with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and MR imaging correlation. Radiology 1993;186(1):27–35.
  • 14 Chen YK , Su CT , Chi KH , Cheng RH , Wang SC , Hsu CH . Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake patterns in Waldeyer’s ring for differentiating benign from malignant lesions in lateral pharyngeal recess of nasopharynx. J Nucl Med 2007;48(1):8–14.
  • 15 Wong WL , Gibson D , Sanghera B , Goodchild K , Saunders M . Evaluation of normal FDG uptake in palatine tonsil and its potential value for detecting occult head and neck cancers: a PET CT study. Nucl Med Commun 2007;28(9):675–680.
  • 16 Cook GJ , Fogelman I , Maisey MN . Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation. Semin Nucl Med 1996;26(4):308–314.
  • 17 Basu S , Houseni M , Alavi A . Significance of incidental fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the parotid glands and its impact on patient management. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29(4):367–373.
  • 18 Heusner TA , Hahn S , Hamami ME , et al. . Incidental head and neck (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT without corresponding morphological lesion: early predictor of cancer development?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36(9):1397–1406.
  • 19 Nabili V , Zaia B , Blackwell KE , Head CS , Grabski K , Sercarz JA . Positron emission tomography: poor sensitivity for occult tonsillar cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 2007;28(3):153–157.
  • 20 Greven KM , Keyes JW , Williams DW , McGuirt WF , Joyce WT . Occult primary tumors of the head and neck: lack of benefit from positron emission tomography imaging with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Cancer 1999;86(1):114–118.
  • 21 Wong WL , Saunders M . The impact of FDG PET on the management of occult primary head and neck tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2003;15(8):461–466.
  • 22 AAssar OS , Fischbein NJ , Caputo GR , et al. . Metastatic head and neck cancer: role and usefulness of FDG PET in locating occult primary tumors. Radiology 1999;210(1):177–181.
  • 23 Graebe M , Pedersen SF , Borgwardt L , Højgaard L , Sillesen H , Kjaer A . Molecular pathology in vulnerable carotid plaques: correlation with [18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37(6):714–721.
  • 24 Wong RJ , Lin DT , Schöder H , et al. . Diagnostic and prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(20):4199–4208.
  • 25 Murakami R , Uozumi H , Hirai T , et al. . Impact of FDG-PET/CT imaging on nodal staging for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68(2):377–382.
  • 26 Duarte PS , Zhuang H , Castellucci P , Alavi A . The receiver operating characteristic curve for the standard uptake value in a group of patients with bone marrow metastasis. Mol Imaging Biol 2002;4(2):157–160.
  • 27 Cook GJ , Maisey MN , Fogelman I . Normal variants, artefacts and interpretative pitfalls in PET imaging with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose and carbon-11 methionine. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26(10):1363–1378.
  • 28 Zasadny KR , Wahl RL . Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. Radiology 1993;189(3):847–850.
  • 29 Lee JR , Madsen MT , Bushnel D , Menda Y . A threshold method to improve standardized uptake value reproducibility. Nucl Med Commun 2000;21(7):685–690.
  • 30 Ramos CD , Erdi YE , Gonen M , et al. . FDG-PET standardized uptake values in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction and filtered back-projection. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28(2):155–164.

Article History

Received August 24, 2009; revision requested October 6; revision received October 16; accepted October 27; final version accepted November 2.
Published online: Apr 8 2010
Published in print: May 2010