Negative Appendectomy Rate in the Era of CT: An 18-year Perspective

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091570

We observed a significant reduction in both the negative appendectomy rate and number of appendectomies performed in emergency department patients, which was associated with a significant increase in the rate of preoperative CT in patients undergoing appendectomy during an 18-year period.

Purpose

To estimate the correlation between the negative appendectomy rate (NAR) and the rate of preoperative computed tomography (CT) in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis who presented to the emergency department during an 18-year period.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective institutional review board–approved, HIPAA-compliant study was performed in a 719-bed tertiary care adult teaching hospital with 58 000 annual emergency department visits. The authors obtained a waiver of informed consent and used the medical records system to compare patients suspected of having appendicitis who presented to the emergency department between 2003 and 2007 to those who presented between 1990 and 1994, the period just before CT became commonly used at the authors’ institution for the evaluation of appendicitis. Surgical and pathology reports were reviewed to determine the NAR, and the authors queried the radiology databases to determine the proportion of appendectomy patients who underwent preoperative imaging. Outcome measures included the NAR, the proportion of appendectomy patients who underwent preoperative CT, and the annual number of appendectomies performed. The χ2 test for trend was used to assess for changes in proportions, and linear regression was used to evaluate numeric trends.

Results

From 1990 to 2007, the NAR decreased significantly from 23.0% to 1.7% (P < .0001), the annual number of appendectomies decreased significantly from 217 per year to 119 per year (P = .0003), and the proportion of patients undergoing appendectomy who underwent preoperative CT increased significantly from 1% to 97.5% (P < .0001).

Conclusion

There was a significant reduction in both the NAR and the number of appendectomies in patients who presented to the emergency department during an 18-year period, which was associated with a significant increase in the use of preoperative abdominal CT.

© RSNA, 2010

References

  • 1 Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132(5):910–925. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Velanovich V, Satava R. Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. Am Surg 1992;58(4):264–269. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Detmer DE, Nevers LE, Sikes ED. Regional results of acute appendicitis care. JAMA 1981;246(12):1318–1320. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Antevil J, Rivera L, Langenberg B, Brown CV. The influence of age and gender on the utility of computed tomography to diagnose acute appendicitis. Am Surg 2004;70(10):850–853. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA, et al.. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 1997;21(3):313–317. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kim K, Rhee JE, Lee CC, et al.. Impact of helical computed tomography in clinically evident appendicitis. Emerg Med J 2008;25(8):477–481. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nathan RO, Blackmore CC, Jarvik JG. Therapeutic impact of CT of the appendix in a community hospital emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(4):1102–1106. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(6):1319–1325. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Lewis FR. Acute appendicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings. Radiology 1987;163(1):11–14. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI, et al.. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med 1987;317(11):666–669. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Khorasani R, Cheng D, Bates D, et al.. Has the use of appendiceal ultrasound been effective in reducing the negative appendectomy rate? J Clin Outcomes Manag 2003;10(1):19–23. Google Scholar
  • 12 Andre JB, Sebastian VA, Ruchman RM, Saad SA. CT and appendicitis: evaluation of correlation between CT diagnosis and pathological diagnosis. Postgrad Med J 2008;84(992):321–324. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 1998;338(3):141–146. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 2001;286(14):1748–1753. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 SCOAP Collaborative, Cuschieri J, Florence M, et al.. Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 2008;248(4):557–563. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chooi WK, Brown JA, Zetler P, Wiseman S, Cooperberg P. Imaging of acute appendicitis and its impact on negative appendectomy and perforation rates: the St. Paul’s experience. Can Assoc Radiol J 2007;58(4):220–224. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kim K, Lee CC, Song KJ, Kim W, Suh G, Singer AJ. The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison. J Emerg Med 2008;34(1):3–6. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Raman SS, Osuagwu FC, Kadell B, Cryer H, Sayre J, Lu DS. Effect of CT on false-positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. N Engl J Med 2008;358(9):972–973. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Frei SP, Bond WF, Bazuro RK, Richardson DM, Sierzega GM, Reed JF. Appendicitis outcomes with increasing computed tomographic scanning. Am J Emerg Med 2008;26(1):39–44. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. Am Surg 2005;71(10):803–808. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB, et al.. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 2010;254(2):460–468. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, et al.. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009;251(1):175–184. LinkGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received August 26, 2009; revision requested October 12; revision received December 12; accepted January 12, 2010; final version accepted February 1.
Published online: Aug 2010
Published in print: Aug 2010