"skipMainNavigation"
closeDrawerMenuopenDrawerMenu
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Original Research

    Effect of Spinal Segment Variants on Numbering Vertebral Levels at Lumbar MR Imaging

    Published Online:Apr 1 2011https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11081511

    Abstract

    Owing to phylogenetic variation, the iliolumbar ligament is not completely reliable for denoting the L5 vertebra.

    Purpose

    To verify iliolumbar ligament (ILL) location, to evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging morphologic features for detecting lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (TVs) (LSTVs), and to determine whether transitional situations are associated with anomalous vertebral numbering.

    Materials and Methods

    Investigational review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. A review of 147 subjects was performed by using spine radiography as the reference standard to determine total and segmental vertebral count and transitional anatomy. Thoracolumbar TVs (TLTVs) and LSTVs were identified. The lumbosacral intervertebral disk angle (LSIVDA), defined as the angle between the endplates, was measured, S1-2 disk morphology was rated according to the classification by O’Driscoll et al, and the ILL level was determined from MR images. Statistical analysis was performed by using χ2 tests for dichotomous and ordinal variables and the t test for continuous variables.

    Results

    An anomalous total number of vertebrae were present in 12 (8.2%) of 147 subjects. The ILL was identified in 126 (85.7%) of 147 subjects and was present at L5 in 122 (96.8%) subjects; the remaining four (3.2%) subjects had an anomalous total number of vertebrae. A complete S1-2 intervertebral disk was associated with LSTVs (P = .004); however, LSIVDA was not (P = .2). TLTVs were present in six (4.1%) and LSTVs were present in 22 (15.0%) of 147 subjects. Both were present in four (2.7%) subjects. The presence of a TLTV was associated with a higher incidence of a concomitant LSTV and vice versa (P < .001; odds ratio [OR], 13.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7, 68.4]). A TLTV was not associated with an anomalous total number of vertebrae (P = .46), but an LSTV was (P < .001; OR, 7.4; 95% CI: 2.2, 24.8).

    Conclusion

    The ILL denotes the lowest lumbar vertebra, which does not always represent L5. A well-formed, complete S1-2 intervertebral disk is associated with LSTVs, but alteration in LSIVDA is not. LSTVs are associated with anomalous vertebral numbering.

    © RSNA, 2011

    References

    • 1 Galis F. Why do almost all mammals have seven cervical vertebrae? developmental constraints, hox genes, and cancer. J Exp Zool 1999;285(1):19–26. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 2 Narita Y, Kuratani S. Evolution of the vertebral formulae in mammals: a perspective on developmental constraints. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 2005;304(2):91–106. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 3 Kier EL. Some developmental and evolutionary aspects of the lumbosacral spine. In: Gouaze ASalamon G, eds. Brain anatomy and magnetic resonance imaging. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1988; 116–139. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 4 Wigh RE. The thoracolumbar and lumbosacral transitional junctions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1980;5(3):215–222. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 5 Bron JL, van Royen BJ, Wuisman PI. The clinical significance of lumbosacral transitional anomalies. Acta Orthop Belg 2007;73(6):687–695. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 6 Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9(5):493–495. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 7 Chang HS, Nakagawa H. Altered function of lumbar nerve roots in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(15):1632–1635. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 8 Delport EG, Cucuzzella TR, Kim N, Marley J, Pruitt C, Delport AG. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: incidence in a consecutive patient series. Pain Physician 2006;9(1):53–56. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 9 Elster AD. Bertolotti’s syndrome revisited: transitional vertebrae of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14(12):1373–1377. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 10 Hahn PY, Strobel JJ, Hahn FJ. Verification of lumbosacral segments on MR images: identification of transitional vertebrae. Radiology 1992;182(2):580–581. Link, Google Scholar
    • 11 Hughes RJ, Saifuddin A. Imaging of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Clin Radiol 2004;59(11):984–991. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 12 Luoma K, Vehmas T, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Riihimäki H. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra: relation to disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29(2):200–205. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 13 Taskaynatan MA, Izci Y, Ozgul A, Hazneci B, Dursun H, Kalyon TA. Clinical significance of congenital lumbosacral malformations in young male population with prolonged low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30(8):E210–E213. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Tini PG, Wieser C, Zinn WM. The transitional vertebra of the lumbosacral spine: its radiological classification, incidence, prevalence, and clinical significance. Rheumatol Rehabil 1977;16(3):180–185. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 15 O’Driscoll CM, Irwin A, Saifuddin A. Variations in morphology of the lumbosacral junction on sagittal MRI: correlation with plain radiography. Skeletal Radiol 1996;25(3):225–230. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 16 Nicholson AA, Roberts GM, Williams LA. The measured height of the lumbosacral disc in patients with and without transitional vertebrae. Br J Radiol 1988;61(726):454–455. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 17 Wigh RE. Phylogeny and the herniated disc. South Med J 1979;72(9):1138–1143. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 18 Malanga GA, Cooke PM. Segmental anomaly leading to wrong level disc surgery in cauda equina syndrome. Pain Physician 2004;7(1):107–110. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 19 Peh WC, Siu TH, Chan JH. Determining the lumbar vertebral segments on magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24(17):1852–1855. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 20 Seyfert S. Dermatome variations in patients with transitional vertebrae. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;63(6):801–803. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 21 Kim YH, Lee PB, Lee CJ, Lee SC, Kim YC, Huh J. Dermatome variation of lumbosacral nerve roots in patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae. Anesth Analg 2008;106(4):1279–1283. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 22 Chithriki M, Jaibaji M, Steele RD. The anatomical relationship of the aortic bifurcation to the lumbar vertebrae: a MRI study. Surg Radiol Anat 2002;24(5):308–312. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 23 Lee CH, Seo BK, Choi YC, et al.. Using MRI to evaluate anatomic significance of aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris when locating lumbar vertebral segments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(5):1295–1300. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 24 Lee CH, Park CM, Kim KA, et al.. Identification and prediction of transitional vertebrae on imaging studies: anatomical significance of paraspinal structures. Clin Anat 2007;20(8):905–914. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 25 Hughes RJ, Saifuddin A. Numbering of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on MRI: role of the iliolumbar ligaments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(1):W59–W65. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 26 Uhthoff HK. Prenatal development of the iliolumbar ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75(1):93–95. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 27 Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Crisco JJ. The role of the iliolumbar ligament in the lumbosacral junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15(11):1138–1141. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 28 Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Kleinrensink GJ, Snijders CJ, Entius C, Stoeckart R. The sacroiliac part of the iliolumbar ligament. J Anat 2001;199(pt 4):457–463. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 29 Luk KDK, Ho HC, Leong JCY. The iliolumbar ligament. A study of its anatomy, development and clinical significance. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68(2):197–200. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 30 Hanson P, Sonesson B. The anatomy of the iliolumbar ligament. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75(11):1245–1246. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 31 Basadonna PT, Gasparini D, Rucco V. Iliolumbar ligament insertions: in vivo anatomic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21(20):2313–2316. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 32 Rucco V, Basadonna PT, Gasparini D. Anatomy of the iliolumbar ligament: a review of its anatomy and a magnetic resonance study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75(6):451–455. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 33 Bressler EL. Numbering of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(2):W210. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 34 Kornreich L, Hadar H, Sulkes J, Gornish M, Ackerman J, Gadoth N. Effect of normal ageing on the sites of aortic bifurcation and inferior vena cava confluence: a CT study. Surg Radiol Anat 1998;20(1):63–68. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 35 Ammerman JM, Ammerman MD, Dambrosia J, Ammerman BJ. A prospective evaluation of the role for intraoperative x-ray in lumbar discectomy: predictors of incorrect level exposure. Surg Neurol 2006;66(5):470–473; discussion 473–474. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 36 Mody MG, Nourbakhsh A, Stahl DL, Gibbs M, Alfawareh M, Garges KJ. The prevalence of wrong level surgery among spine surgeons. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(2):194–198. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Received August 25, 2008; revision requested October 1, 2008; revision received September 13, 2010; accepted September 21, 2010; final version accepted November 15, 2010.
    Published online: Apr 2011
    Published in print: Apr 2011