Computer-aided Diagnosis: How to Move from the Laboratory to the Clinic

References

• 1 Rubin GD. Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 2000;36(2):74–80.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2 Giger ML, Karssemeijer N, Armato SG. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20(12):1205–1208.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Moore’s Law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore’s_law. Accessed August 26, 2009.
  Google Scholar
• 4 Kurzweil R. The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. New York, NY: Viking Penguin, 2005.
  Google Scholar
• 5 Lodwick GS, Keats TE, Dorst JP. The coding of Roentgen images for computer analysis as applied to lung cancer. Radiology 1963;81:185–200.
  Google Scholar
• 6 Lodwick GS. Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology. A research plan. Invest Radiol 1966;1(1):72–80.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7 De Boo DW, Prokop M, Uffmann M, van Ginneken B, Schaefer-Prokop CM. Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules and small tumours on chest radiographs. Eur J Radiol 2009;72(2):218–225.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8 Jain AK. Fundamentals of digital image processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989.
  Google Scholar
• 9 Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG. Pattern classification. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 2001.
  Google Scholar
• 10 Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Secaucus, NJ: Springer, 2007.
  Google Scholar
• 11 Duin RP. Superlearning and neural network magic. Pattern Recognit Lett 1994;15(3):215–217.
  Google Scholar
• 12 Bennett KP. Support vector machines: hype or hallelujah? SIGKDD Explor Newslett 2000;2(2):1–13.
  Google Scholar
• 13 van Ginneken B, Hogeweg L, Prokop M. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: beyond nodules. Eur J Radiol 2009;72(2):226–230.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14 Giger ML, Chan HP, Boone J. Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. Med Phys 2008;35(12):5799–5820.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15 Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2007;31(4-5):198–211.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16 Nishikawa RM. Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2007;31(4-5):224–235.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17 van Ginneken B, ter Haar Romeny BM, Viergever MA. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20(12):1228–1241.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18 Sluimer IC, Schilham AM, Prokop M, van Ginneken B. Computer analysis of computed tomography scans of the lung: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(4):385–405.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 Chan HP, Hadjiiski L, Zhou C, Sahiner B. Computer-aided diagnosis of lung cancer and pulmonary embolism in computed tomography-a review. Acad Radiol 2008;15(5):535–555.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 20 Boyer B, Balleyguier C, Granat O, Pharaboz C. CAD in questions/answers: review of the literature. Eur J Radiol 2009;69(1):24–33.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21 Roehrig J. The manufacturer’s perspective. Br J Radiol 2005;78(Spec No 1):S41–S45.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22 Dean JC, Ilvento CC. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(1):20–28.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23 Brem RF. Clinical versus research approach to breast cancer detection with CAD: where are we now? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(1):234–235.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 24 Noble M, Bruening W, Uhl S, Schoelles K. Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;279(6):881–890.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 25 Aunt Minnie Buyer’s Guide. http://www.auntminnie.com/index.asp?sec=vdp. Accessed August 26, 2009.
  Google Scholar
• 26 Das M, Mühlenbruch G, Mahnken AH, et al.. Small pulmonary nodules: effect of two computer-aided detection systems on radiologist performance. Radiology 2006;241(2):564–571.
  Google Scholar
• 27 CDRH Advisory Meeting Materials Archive. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfAdvisory/details.cfm?mtg=659. Accessed August 26, 2009.
  Google Scholar
• 28 Gur D. Imaging technology and practice assessment studies: importance of the baseline or reference performance level. Radiology 2008;247(1):8–11.
  Google Scholar
• 29 Horsch K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Lan L, Mendelson EB, Hendrick RE. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology 2006;240(2):357–368.
  Google Scholar
• 30 Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Rijken H, Holland R. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support. Br J Radiol 2006;79(Spec No 2):S123–S126.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31 Abràmoff MD, Niemeijer M, Suttorp-Schulten MS, Viergever MA, Russell SR, van Ginneken B. Evaluation of a system for automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy from color fundus photographs in a large population of patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2008;31(2):193–198.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32 Nishikawa RM. Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. For the proposition. Med Phys 2006;33(4):811–812.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 33 Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Toledano AY, Doi K. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology 2001;220(3):787–794.
  Google Scholar
• 34 Boone JM. Radiological interpretation 2020: toward quantitative image assessment. Med Phys 2007;34(11):4173–4179.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 35 Isgum I, Rutten A, Prokop M, van Ginneken B. Detection of coronary calcifications from computed tomography scans for automated risk assessment of coronary artery disease. Med Phys 2007;34(4):1450–1461.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 36 Rumberger JA. Coronary artery calcium scanning using computed tomography: clinical recommendations for cardiac risk assessment and treatment. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2008;29(3):223–229.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 37 Müller NL, Staples CA, Miller RR, Abboud RT. “Density mask”. An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. Chest 1988;94(4):782–787.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 38 Xu Y, Sonka M, McLennan G, Guo J, Hoffman EA. MDCT-based 3-D texture classification of emphysema and early smoking related lung pathologies. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(4):464–475.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 39 Sluimer IC, Prokop M, Hartmann I, van Ginneken B. Automated classification of hyperlucency, fibrosis, ground glass, solid, and focal lesions in high-resolution CT of the lung. Med Phys 2006;33(7):2610–2620.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 40 Tanner JM, Oshman D, Lindgren G, Grunbaum JA, Elsouki R, Labarthe D. Reliability and validity of computer-assisted estimates of Tanner-Whitehouse skeletal maturity (CASAS): comparison with the manual method. Horm Res 1994;42(6):288–294.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 41 Albanese A, Hall C, Stanhope R. The use of a computerized method of bone age assessment in clinical practice. Horm Res 1995;44(Suppl 3):2–7.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 42 Thodberg HH, Kreiborg S, Juul A, Pedersen KD. The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28(1):52–66.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 43 Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1959.
  Google Scholar
• 44 van Rijn RR, Lequin MH, Thodberg HH. Automatic determination of Greulich and Pyle bone age in healthy Dutch children. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39(6):591–597.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 45 Martin DD, Deusch D, Schweizer R, Binder G, Thodberg HH, Ranke MB. Clinical application of automated Greulich-Pyle bone age determination in children with short stature. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39(6):598–607.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 46 de Hoop B, Gietema H, van Ginneken B, Zanen P, Groenewegen G, Prokop M. A comparison of six software packages for evaluation of solid lung nodules using semiautomated volumetry: what is the minimum increase in size to detect growth in repeated CT examinations. Eur Radiol 2009;19(4):800–808.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 47 Boedeker KL, McNitt-Gray MF, Rogers SR, et al.. Emphysema: effect of reconstruction algorithm on CT imaging measures. Radiology 2004;232(1):295–301.
  Google Scholar
• 48 Schilham AM, van Ginneken B, Gietema H, Prokop M. Local noise weighted filtering for emphysema scoring of low-dose CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(4):451–463.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 49 Gietema HA, Schilham AM, van Ginneken B, van Klaveren RJ, Lammers JW, Prokop M. Monitoring of smoking-induced emphysema with CT in a lung cancer screening setting: detection of real increase in extent of emphysema. Radiology 2007;244(3):890–897.
  Google Scholar
• 50 Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, et al.. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 2004;14(1):86–92.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 51 Detrano RC, Anderson M, Nelson J, et al.. Coronary calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on rescan reproducibility—MESA study. Radiology 2005;236(2):477–484.
  Google Scholar
• 52 Heussel CP, Achenbach T, Buschsieweke C, et al.. Quantification of pulmonary emphysema in multislice-CT using different software tools [in German]. Rofo 2006;178(10):987–998.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 53 Summers RM. Road maps for advancement of radiologic computer-aided detection in the 21st century. Radiology 2003;229(1):11–13.
  Google Scholar
• 54 Noumeir R. Benefits of the DICOM structured report. J Digit Imaging 2006;19(4):295–306.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 55 Zhou Z, Liu BJ, Le AH. CAD-PACS integration tool kit based on DICOM secondary capture, structured report and IHE workflow profiles. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2007;31(4-5):346–352.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 56 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.ihe.net/. Accessed September 6, 2009.
  Google Scholar
• 57 van Ginneken B, Stegmann MB, Loog M. Segmentation of anatomical structures in chest radiographs using supervised methods: a comparative study on a public database. Med Image Anal 2006;10(1):19–40.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 58 MacMahon H, Montner SM, Doi K, Liu KJ. The nature and subtlety of abnormal findings in chest radiographs. Med Phys 1991;18(2):206–210.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 59 Simon HA, Bibel W, Bundy A. AI’s greatest trends and controversies. IEEE Intell Syst 2000;15(1):8–17.
  Google Scholar
• 60 Turing AM. Can a machine think? Mind 1950;59(236):433–460.
  Google Scholar
• 61 Lohr S. Microsoft, amid dwindling interest, talks up computing as a career. New York Times, March 1, 2004.
  Google Scholar
• 62 Li F, Engelmann R, Doi K, Macmahon H. True detection versus “accidental” detection of small lung cancer by a computer-aided detection (CAD) program on chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging 2010;23(1):66–72.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 63 Maglogiannis I, Doukas CN. Overview of advanced computer vision systems for skin lesions characterization. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2009;13(5):721–733.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 64 Sonka M, Hlavác V, Boyle R. Image processing, analysis, and machine vision. 3rd ed. Toronto, Canada: Thomson Learning, 2007.
  Google Scholar
• 65 Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, et al.. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003;227(1):192–200.
  Google Scholar
• 66 Armato SG, McLennan G, McNitt-Gray MF, et al.. Lung image database consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community. Radiology 2004;232(3):739–748.
  Google Scholar
• 67 National Biomedical Imaging Archive. http://ncia.nci.nih.gov/. Accessed August 26, 2009.
  Google Scholar
• 68 van Ginneken B, Heimann T, Styner M. 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge. In: van Ginneken BHeimann TStyner M, eds. 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge. Brisbane, Australia: MICCAI, 2007; 7–15.
  Google Scholar
• 69 Heimann T, van Ginneken B, Styner MA, et al.. Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28(8):1251–1265.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 70 Schaap M, Metz CT, van Walsum T, et al.. Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms. Med Image Anal 2009;13(5):701–714.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 71 The ANODE09 Competition for Nodule Detection in Chest CT. http://anode09.isi.uu.nl. Accessed August 26, 2009.
  Google Scholar
• 72 Volcano’09 Challenge. http://www.via.cornell.edu/challenge/. Accessed August 26, 2009.
  Google Scholar
• 73 Retinopathy online challenge. http://roc.healthcare.uiowa.edu/. Accessed August 26, 2009.
  Google Scholar
• 74 Netflix Prize. http://www.netflixprize.com/. Accessed August 26, 2009.
  Google Scholar
• 75 Ellenberg J This psychologist might outsmart the math brains competing for the Netflix prize. Wired, February 2008.
  Google Scholar
• 76 Surowiecki JM. The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York, NY: Little, Brown, 2004.
  Google Scholar
• 77 Reitinger B, Bornik A, Beichel R, Schmalstieg D. Liver surgery planning using virtual reality. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2006;26(6):36–47.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 78 De Hoop B, De Boo D, Gietema HA, Van Hoorn F, Mearadji B, Schaefer-Prokop CM. CAD for the detection of tumors in CXRs of smokers: results of an observer L-ROC study [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2009; 533–534.
  Google Scholar
• 79 Kittler J, Hatef M, Duin RP, Matas J. On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1998;20(3):226–239.
  Google Scholar
• 80 Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al.. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009;253(2):353–358.
  Google Scholar
• 81 Lee N, Lain AF, Marquez G, Levsky JM, Gohagan JK. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to improve CT lung cancer screening. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2009;2:136–146.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 82 Robinson C, Halligan S, Taylor SA, Mallett S, Altman DG. CT colonography: a systematic review of standard of reporting for studies of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2008;246(2):426–433.
  Google Scholar
• 83 Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al.. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006;131(6):1690–1699.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 84 Bell RM, Koren Y. Lessons from the Netflix prize challenge. SIGKDD Explor Newslett 2007;9(2):1931–1945.
  Google Scholar
• 85 Bell RM, Koren Y. Scalable collaborative filtering with jointly derived neighborhood interpolation weights. Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2007; 43–52.
  Google Scholar