Distress in the Radiology Waiting Room

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11102211

Uncertainty of diagnosis can weigh heavily on the patient, and perceptions of what medical personnel may consider a minor procedure do not necessarily reflect the patient’s experience.

Purpose

To assess the level of distress in women awaiting radiologic procedures.

Materials and Methods

In this institutional review board–approved and HIPAA-compliant study, 214 women between 18 and 86 (mean, 47.9) years of age completed the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Impact of Events Scale (IES), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) immediately prior to their procedures. One hundred twelve women awaited breast biopsy; 42, hepatic chemoembolization for cancer; and 60, uterine fibroid embolization. Data were analyzed with multivariate analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests. Results are reported as means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

All three patient groups experienced abnormally high mean PSS, IES, and CES-D scores, but only the breast biopsy group had highly abnormal anxiety levels. Breast biopsy patients had a significantly higher mean STAI score of 48 (95% CI: 45, 50) than did women awaiting hepatic chemoembolization (mean score, 26; 95% CI: 22, 29; P < .001) and fibroid embolization (mean score, 24; 95% CI: 21, 27; P < .001). IES ratings did not differ significantly among the groups, with a mean score of 26 (95% CI: 23, 29) for breast biopsy patients, 23 (95% CI: 18, 28) for hepatic chemoembolization patients, and 23 (95% CI: 18, 27) for fibroid embolization patients. The CES-D score did not differ significantly among breast biopsy (mean score, 15; 95% CI: 13, 17), hepatic chemoembolization (mean score, 14; 95% CI: 11, 18), and fibroid embolization (mean score, 12; 95% CI: 9, 15) patients. PSS ratings of breast biopsy patients were significantly higher (mean score, 18; 95% CI: 16, 19) than those of hepatic chemoembolization patients (mean, 15; 95% CI: 13, 17; P < .01), but they were not significantly different from those of women awaiting fibroid embolization (mean, 16; 95% CI: 14, 18; P = .23).

Conclusion

Uncertainty of diagnosis can be associated with greater stress than is awaiting more invasive and potentially risky treatment.

© RSNA, 2011

References

  • 1 Peteet JR, Stomper PC, Ross DM, Cotton V, Truesdell P, Moczynski W. Emotional support for patients with cancer who are undergoing CT: semistructured interviews of patients at a cancer institute. Radiology 1992;182(1):99–102. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bugbee ME, Wellisch DK, Arnott IM, et al.. Breast core-needle biopsy: clinical trial of relaxation technique versus medication versus no intervention for anxiety reduction. Radiology 2005;234(1):73–78. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lang EV, Benotsch EG, Fick LJ, et al.. Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomised trial. Lancet 2000;355(9214):1486–1490. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lang EV, Berbaum KS, Faintuch S, et al.. Adjunctive self-hypnotic relaxation for outpatient medical procedures: a prospective randomized trial with women undergoing large core breast biopsy. Pain 2006;126(1-3):155–164. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lang EV, Berbaum KS, Pauker SG, et al.. Beneficial effects of hypnosis and adverse effects of empathic attention during percutaneous tumor treatment: when being nice does not suffice. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19(6):897–905. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schupp CJ, Berbaum K, Berbaum M, Lang EV. Pain and anxiety during interventional radiologic procedures: effect of patients’ state anxiety at baseline and modulation by nonpharmacologic analgesia adjuncts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16(12):1585–1592. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Viegas Lde S, Turrini RN, da Silva Bastos Cerullo JA. An analysis of nursing diagnoses for patients undergoing procedures in a Brazilian interventional radiology suite. AORN J 2010;91(5):544–547. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Johnston M. Anxiety in surgical patients. Psychol Med 1980;10(1):145–152. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mishel MH. Perceived uncertainty and stress in illness. Res Nurs Health 1984;7(3):163–171. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Auerbach SM, Martelli MF, Mercuri LG. Anxiety, information, interpersonal impacts, and adjustment to a stressful health care situation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983;44(6):1284–1296. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jenkins CD, Stanton BA, Jono RT. Quantifying and predicting recovery after heart surgery. Psychosom Med 1994;56(3):203–212. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kagan I, Bar-Tal Y. The effect of preoperative uncertainty and anxiety on short-term recovery after elective arthroplasty. J Clin Nurs 2008;17(5):576–583. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lang EV, Ward C, Laser E. Effect of team training on patients’ ability to complete MRI examinations. Acad Radiol 2010;17(1):18–23. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Martin ML, Lennox PH, Buckley BT. Pain and anxiety: two problems, two solutions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16(12):1581–1584. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189–198. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Endicott J, Spitzer RL. A diagnostic interview: the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35(7):837–844. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Spielberger CD, Sarason IG, Defares PB. Stress and anxiety. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1985; 1–285. Google Scholar
  • 18 Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979;41(3):209–218. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Joseph S. Psychometric evaluation of Horowitz’s Impact of Event Scale: a review. J Trauma Stress 2000;13(1):101–113. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1(3):385–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1996; 29–37. Google Scholar
  • 22 Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983;24(4):385–396. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cohen S, Williamson GM. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan SOskamp S, eds. Social psychology of health. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage, 1988; 1–257. Google Scholar
  • 24 Hughson AV, Cooper AF, McArdle CS, Smith DC. Psychosocial morbidity in patients awaiting breast biopsy. J Psychosom Res 1988;32(2):173–180. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lang EV, Berbaum KS, Lutgendorf SK. Large-core breast biopsy: abnormal salivary cortisol profiles associated with uncertainty of diagnosis. Radiology 2009;250(3):631–637. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gustafsson O, Theorell T, Norming U, Perski A, Ohström M, Nyman CR. Psychological reactions in men screened for prostate cancer. Br J Urol 1995;75(5):631–636. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Han PK, Moser RP, Klein WM. Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey. Health Expect 2007;10(4):321–336. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Maikranz JM, Steele RG, Dreyer ML, Stratman AC, Bovaird JA. The relationship of hope and illness-related uncertainty to emotional adjustment and adherence among pediatric renal and liver transplant recipients. J Pediatr Psychol 2007;32(5):571–581. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull 1985;98(2):310–357. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Spiegel D, Morrow GR, Classen C, et al.. Group psychotherapy for recently diagnosed breast cancer patients: a multicenter feasibility study. Psychooncology 1999;8(6):482–493. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Krantz DS, Kop WJ, Santiago HT, Gottdiener JS. Mental stress as a trigger of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Cardiol Clin 1996;14(2):271–287. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Mueller PR, Biswal S, Halpern EF, Kaufman JA, Lee MJ. Interventional radiologic procedures: patient anxiety, perception of pain, understanding of procedure, and satisfaction with medication—a prospective study. Radiology 2000;215(3):684–688. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Anderson KO, Masur FT. Psychologic preparation for cardiac catheterization. Heart Lung 1989;18(2):154–163. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Beckerman A, Grossman D, Marquez L. Cardiac catheterization: the patients’ perspective. Heart Lung 1995;24(3):213–219. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lang EV, Berbaum KS. Educating interventional radiology personnel in nonpharmacologic analgesia: effect on patients’ pain perception. Acad Radiol 1997;4(11):753–757. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lang EV, Laser E, Anderson B, et al.. Shaping the experience of behavior: construct of an electronic teaching module in nonpharmacologic analgesia and anxiolysis. Acad Radiol 2002;9(10):1185–1193. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lown BA, Roy E, Gorman P, Sasson JP. Women’s and residents’ experiences of communication in the diagnostic mammography suite. Patient Educ Couns 2009;77(3):328–337. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Lang EV, Rosen MP. Cost analysis of adjunct hypnosis with sedation during outpatient interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology 2002;222(2):375–382. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Montgomery GH, Bovbjerg DH, Schnur JB, et al.. A randomized clinical trial of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99(17):1304–1312. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received November 17, 2010; revision requested January 5, 2011; final revision received January 10; accepted February 9; final version accepted February 18.
Published online: July 2011
Published in print: July 2011