The Pros and Cons of Searching for Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac CT: Use of a Restricted Field of View Is Acceptable

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11111131

While there is no obvious harm in reconstructing a wide field of view (FOV) at cardiac CT, on the basis of logistical considerations and current practice patterns, at present, it appears equally justifiable to use a FOV restricted to the heart.

References

  • 1 Bastarrika G, Lee YS, Huda W, Ruzsics B, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 2009;253(2):317–338. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Shih WJ, McFarland KA, Kiefer V, Wierzbinski B. Illustrations of abdominal abnormalities on 99mTc tetrofosmin gated cardiac SPECT. Nucl Med Commun 2005;26(2):119–127. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McKenna DA, Laxpati M, Colletti PM. The prevalence of incidental findings at cardiac MRI. Open Cardiovasc Med J 2008;2:20–25. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Khosa F, Romney BP, Costa DN, Rofsky NM, Manning WJ. Prevalence of noncardiac findings on clinical cardiovascular MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(4):W380–W386. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Atalay MK, Prince EA, Pearson CA, Chang KJ. The prevalence and clinical significance of noncardiac findings on cardiac MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(4):W387–W393. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Horton KM, Post WS, Blumenthal RS, Fishman EK. Prevalence of significant noncardiac findings on electron-beam computed tomography coronary artery calcium screening examinations. Circulation 2002;106(5):532–534. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hunold P, Schmermund A, Seibel RM, Grönemeyer DH, Erbel R. Prevalence and clinical significance of accidental findings in electron-beam tomographic scans for coronary artery calcification. Eur Heart J 2001;22(18):1748–1758. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schragin JG, Weissfeld JL, Edmundowicz D, Strollo DC, Fuhrman CR. Non-cardiac findings on coronary electron beam computed tomography scanning. J Thorac Imaging 2004;19(2):82–86. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G, et al.. Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(2):402–406. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Haller S, Kaiser C, Buser P, Bongartz G, Bremerich J. Coronary artery imaging with contrast-enhanced MDCT: extracardiac findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(1):105–110. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gil BN, Ran K, Tamar G, Shmuell F, Eli A. Prevalence of significant noncardiac findings on coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography in asymptomatic patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31(1):1–4. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kawano Y, Tamura A, Goto Y, Shinozaki K, Zaizen H, Kadota J. Incidental detection of cancers and other non-cardiac abnormalities on coronary multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2007;99(11):1608–1609. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cademartiri F, Malagò R, Belgrano M, et al.. Spectrum of collateral findings in multislice CT coronary angiography. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007;112(7):937–948. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kirsch J, Araoz PA, Steinberg FB, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH, Williamson EE. Prevalence and significance of incidental extracardiac findings at 64-multidetector coronary CTA. J Thorac Imaging 2007;22(4):330–334. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mueller J, Jeudy J, Poston R, White CS. Cardiac CT angiography after coronary bypass surgery: prevalence of incidental findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(2):414–419. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Northam M, Koonce J, Ravenel JG. Pulmonary nodules detected at cardiac CT: comparison of images in limited and full fields of view. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(3):878–881. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Law YM, Huang J, Chen K, Cheah FK, Chua T. Prevalence of significant extracoronary findings on multislice CT coronary angiography examinations and coronary artery calcium scoring examinations. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008;52(1):49–56. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Koonce J, Schoepf JU, Nguyen SA, Northam MC, Ravenel JG. Extra-cardiac findings at cardiac CT: experience with 1,764 patients. Eur Radiol 2009;19(3):570–576. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kim TJ, Han DH, Jin KN, Won Lee K. Lung cancer detected at cardiac CT: prevalence, clinicoradiologic features, and importance of full-field-of-view images. Radiology 2010;255(2):369–376. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Johnson KM, Dennis JM, Dowe DA. Extracardiac findings on coronary CT angiograms: limited versus complete image review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(1):143–148. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Budoff MJ, Fischer H, Gopal A. Incidental findings with cardiac CT evaluation: should we read beyond the heart? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;68(6):965–973. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Fantauzzi J, MacArthur A, Lu M, Jeudy J, White CS. Quantitative assessment of percentage of lung parenchyma visualized on cardiac computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34(3):385–387. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 National Cancer Institute. Lung cancer trial results show mortality benefit with low-dose CT. http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/NLSTresultsRelease. Published November 4, 2010. Accessed April 30, 2011. Google Scholar
  • 24 National Lung Screening Trial Research TeamAberle DR, Adams AM, et al.. Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(23):1771–1779. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 MacHaalany J, Yam Y, Ruddy TD, et al.. Potential clinical and economic consequences of noncardiac incidental findings on cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(16):1533–1541. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lee CI, Tsai EB, Sigal BM, Plevritis SK, Garber AM, Rubin GD. Incidental extracardiac findings at coronary CT: clinical and economic impact. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(6):1531–1538. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Burt JR, Iribarren C, Fair JM, et al.. Incidental findings on cardiac multidetector row computed tomography among healthy older adults: prevalence and clinical correlates. Arch Intern Med 2008;168(7):756–761. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 National Lung Screening Trial Research TeamAberle DR, Berg CD, et al.. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 2011;258(1):243–253. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Olsen K, Jeudy J, White CS. Use of wide vs limited cardiac CT field of view: a survey of cardiac imagers. Abstract presented at the 29th annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Radiology, Bonita Springs, Fla, March 6–9, 2011. Google Scholar
  • 30 American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac computed tomography (CT). In: ACR practice guidelines and technical standards. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2007; 361–370. Google Scholar

Article History

Received June 1, 2011; revision requested June 22; revision received June 22; final version accepted June 23.
Published online: Nov 2011
Published in print: Nov 2011