The Bosniak Renal Cyst Classification: 25 Years Later

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11111595

The Bosniak renal cyst classification has, thus far, passed the test of time and has been a useful method for diagnosing and suggesting the management of complicated cysts and cystic neoplasms.

In the past 25 years, there have been continuous advances in the diagnosis of disease throughout the body owing to the introduction of new technology and the experience gained with its use. However, the imaging and evaluation of complicated cystic lesions of the kidneys frequently remains a difficult problem. The classification of renal cystic lesions suggested 25 years ago, now referred to as the Bosniak renal cyst classification, remains pertinent to the diagnosis and management of these difficult-to-diagnose complicated cystic masses.

© RSNA, 2012

References

  • 1 Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986;158(1):1–10.
  • 2 Evans JA, Bosniak MA. Atlas of tumor radiology: the kidney. Chicago, Ill: Yearbook Publishers, 1971.
  • 3 Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986;158:1–10.
  • 4 Wilson TE, Doelle EA, Cohan RH, Wojno K, Korobkin M. Cystic renal masses: a reevaluation of the usefulness of the Bosniak classification system. Acad Radiol 1996;3(7):564–570.
  • 5 Bosniak MA. Cystic renal masses: a reevaluation of the usefullness of the Bosniak classification system (letter). Acad Radiol 1996;3(11):981–984.
  • 6 Cloix P, Martin X, Pangaud C, et al.. Surgical management of complex renal cysts: a series of 32 cases. J Urol 1996;156(1):28–30.
  • 7 Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(2):339–342.
  • 8 Lévy P, Hélénon O, Merran S, et al.. Cystic tumors of the kidney in adults: radio-histopathologic correlations [in French]. J Radiol 1999;80(2):121–133.
  • 9 Warren KS, McFarlane J. The Bosniak classification of renal cystic masses. BJU Int 2005;95(7):939–942.
  • 10 Graumann O, Osther SS, Osther PJ. Characterization of complex renal cysts: a critical evaluation of the Bosniak classification. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011;45(2):84–90.
  • 11 Koga S, Nishikido M, Inuzuka S, et al.. An evaluation of Bosniak’s radiological classification of cystic renal masses. BJU Int 2000;86(6):607–609.
  • 12 Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, Richie JP. Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 2008;249(1):16–31.
  • 13 Bosniak MA. Problems in the radiologic diagnosis of renal parenchymal tumors. Urol Clin North Am 1993;20(2):217–230.
  • 14 Bosniak MA. Problematic renal masses. In: McClennan BL, ed. 1994 Syllabus: categorical course in genitourinary radiology. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 1994; 182–191.
  • 15 Bosniak MA. Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(3):819–821.
  • 16 Bosniak MA. The use of the Bosniak classification system for renal cysts and cystic tumors. J Urol 1997;157(5):1852–1853.
  • 17 O’Malley RL, Godoy G, Hecht EM, Stifelman MD, Taneja SS. Bosniak category IIF designation and surgery for complex renal cysts. J Urol 2009;182(3):1091–1095.
  • 18 Israel GM, Bosniak MA. Calcification in cystic renal masses: is it important in diagnosis? Radiology 2003;226(1):47–52.
  • 19 Israel GM, Bosniak MA. How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology 2005;236(2):441–450.
  • 20 Israel GM, Bosniak MA. An update of the Bosniak renal cyst classification system. Urology 2005;66(3):484–488.
  • 21 Israel GM, Bosniak MA. Follow-up CT of moderately complex cystic lesions of the kidney (Bosniak category IIF). AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181(3):627–633.
  • 22 Gabr AH, Gdor Y, Roberts WW, Wolf JS. Radiographic surveillance of minimally and moderately complex renal cysts. BJU (Int) 2008;103:1116–1119.
  • 23 Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Zimbaro G, et al.. Complex cystic renal masses: characterization with contrast-enhanced US. Radiology 2007;243(1):158–165.
  • 24 Park BK, Kim B, Kim SH, Ko K, Lee HM, Choi HY. Assessment of cystic renal masses based on Bosniak classification: comparison of CT and contrast-enhanced US. Eur J Radiol 2007;61(2):310–314.
  • 25 Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Cioffi V, et al.. Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography with unenhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(4):1239–1249.
  • 26 Israel GM, Hindman NM, Bosniak MA. Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 2004;231(2):365–371.
  • 27 Balci NC, Semelka RC, Patt RH, et al.. Complex renal cysts: findings on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172(6):1495–1500.
  • 28 Adey GS, Pedrosa I, Rofsky NM, et al.. Lower limits of detection using magnetic resonance imaging for solid components in cystic renal neoplasms. Urology 2008;71:47–51.
  • 29 Hecht EM, Israel GM, Krinsky GA, et al.. Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232(2):373–378.
  • 30 Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, Cimilli T. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of primary solid and cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification. Eur J Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.024. Published online March 3, 2011.
  • 31 Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, Fisher AJ, Humphrey P, Heiken JP. CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(3):813–818.
  • 32 Al-Aynati M, Chen V, Salama S, Shuhaibar H, Treleaven D, Vincic L. Interobserver and intraobserver variability using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127(5):593–596.
  • 33 Lang H, Lindner V, de Fromont M, et al.. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: assessment of 241 patients with .15-year follow-up. Cancer 2005;103(3):625–629.
  • 34 Raitanen MP, Aine R, Rintala E, et al.. Differences between local and review urinary cytology in diagnosis of bladder cancer: an interobserver multicenter analysis. Eur Urol 2002;41(3):284–289.
  • 35 Guarner J, Herrera-Goepfert R, Mohar A, et al.. Interobserver variability in application of the revised Sydney classification for gastritis. Hum Pathol 1999;30(12):1431–1434.
  • 36 Wainwright AM, Williams JR, Carr AJ. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82(5):636–642.
  • 37 Harisinghani MG, Maher MM, Gervais DA, et al.. Incidence of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak category III): should imaging-guided biopsy precede surgery? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(3):755–758.
  • 38 Lang EK, Macchia RJ, Gayle B, et al.. CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal cystic masses (Bosniak 3 and 2F): accuracy and impact on clinical management. Eur Radiol 2002;12(10):2518–2524.
  • 39 Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006;240(1):6–22.
  • 40 Rybicki FJ, Shu KM, Cibas ES, Fielding JR, vanSonnenberg E, Silverman SG. Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(5):1281–1287.
  • 41 Bosniak MA. Should we biospy complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak category III) (letter)? AJR 2003;181:1425–1426.
  • 42 Todd TD, Dhurandhar B, Mody D, Ramzy I, Truong LD. Fine-needle aspiration of cystic lesions of the kidney: morphologic spectrum and diagnostic problems in 41 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;111(3):317–328.

Article History

Received August 8, 2011; revision requested September 2; revision received September 27; final version accepted October 6.
Published online: Mar 2012
Published in print: Mar 2012