Interobserver Variability in the CT Assessment of Honeycombing in the Lungs

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112516

Even experienced radiologists may disagree on the identification of the presence of honeycombing, and this disagreement is caused mainly by the misinterpretation of conditions that may mimic honeycombing, such as traction bronchiectasis and emphysema.

Purpose

To quantify observer agreement and analyze causes of disagreement in identifying honeycombing at chest computed tomography (CT).

Materials and Methods

The institutional review board approved this multiinstitutional HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, and informed patient consent was not required. Five core study members scored 80 CT images with a five-point scale (5 = definitely yes to 1 = definitely no) to establish a reference standard for the identification of honeycombing. Forty-three observers from various subspecialties and geographic regions scored the CT images by using the same scoring system. Weighted κ values of honeycombing scores compared with the reference standard were analyzed to investigate intergroup differences. Images were divided into four groups to allow analysis of imaging features of cases in which there was disagreement: agreement on the presence of honeycombing, agreement on the absence of honeycombing, disagreement on the presence of honeycombing, and other (none of the preceding three groups applied).

Results

Agreement of scores of honeycombing presence by 43 observers with the reference standard was moderate (Cohen weighted κ values: 0.40–0.58). There were no significant differences in κ values among groups defined by either subspecialty or geographic region (Tukey-Kramer test, P = .38 to >.99). In 29% of cases, there was disagreement on identification of honeycombing. These cases included honeycombing mixed with traction bronchiectasis, large cysts, and superimposed pulmonary emphysema.

Conclusion

Identification of honeycombing at CT is subjective, and disagreement is largely caused by conditions that mimic honeycombing.

© RSNA, 2012

References

  • 1 Lynch DA, Godwin JD, Safrin S, et al.. High-resolution computed tomography in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and prognosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172(4):488–493.
  • 2 Hunninghake GW, Lynch DA, Galvin JR, et al.. Radiologic findings are strongly associated with a pathologic diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia. Chest 2003;124(4):1215–1223.
  • 3 Nishimura K, Kitaichi M, Izumi T, Nagai S, Kanaoka M, Itoh H. Usual interstitial pneumonia: histologic correlation with high-resolution CT. Radiology 1992;182(2):337–342.
  • 4 American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment—international consensus statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161(2 Pt 1):646–664.
  • 5 Johkoh T, Müller NL, Cartier Y, et al.. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: diagnostic accuracy of thin-section CT in 129 patients. Radiology 1999;211(2):555–560.
  • 6 Nagai S, Kitaichi M, Itoh H, Nishimura K, Izumi T, Colby TV. Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia/fibrosis: comparison with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and BOOP. Eur Respir J 1998;12(5):1010–1019.
  • 7 Sumikawa H, Johkoh T, Colby TV, et al.. Computed tomography findings in pathological usual interstitial pneumonia: relationship to survival. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177(4):433–439.
  • 8 Sumikawa H, Johkoh T, Ichikado K, et al.. Usual interstitial pneumonia and chronic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: analysis of CT appearance in 92 patients. Radiology 2006;241(1):258–266.
  • 9 Flaherty KR, Toews GB, Travis WD, et al.. Clinical significance of histological classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2002;19(2):275–283.
  • 10 Elliot TL, Lynch DA, Newell JD, et al.. High-resolution computed tomography features of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29(3):339–345.
  • 11 Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al.. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis—evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183(6):788–824.
  • 12 Shin KM, Lee KS, Chung MP, et al.. Prognostic determinants among clinical, thin-section CT, and histopathologic findings for fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: tertiary hospital study. Radiology 2008;249(1):328–337.
  • 13 Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 2008;246(3):697–722.
  • 14 Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003;228(2):303–308.
  • 15 Arakawa H, Honma K. Honeycomb lung: history and current concepts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(4):773–782.
  • 16 Johnson TH. Radiology and honeycomb lung disease. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1968;104(4):810–821.
  • 17 Primack SL, Hartman TE, Hansell DM, Müller NL. End-stage lung disease: CT findings in 61 patients. Radiology 1993;189(3):681–686.
  • 18 Galvin JR, Frazier AA, Franks TJ. Collaborative radiologic and histopathologic assessment of fibrotic lung disease. Radiology 2010;255(3):692–706.
  • 19 Genereux GP. The end-stage lung: pathogenesis, pathology, and radiology. Radiology 1975;116(02):279–289.
  • 20 Reed JC, Reeder MM. Honeycomb lung (interstitial fibrosis). JAMA 1975;231(6):646–647.
  • 21 Travis WD, Hunninghake G, King TE, et al.. Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: report of an American Thoracic Society project. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177(12):1338–1347.
  • 22 Katzenstein AL. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. In: Katzenstein AL, ed. Katzenstein and Askin’s surgical pathology of non-neoplastic lung disease. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2006; 51–84.
  • 23 Heppleston AG. The pathology of honeycomb lung. Thorax 1956;11(2):77–93.
  • 24 Pimentel JC. Tridimensional photographic reconstruction in a study of the pathogenesis of honeycomb lung. Thorax 1967;22(5):444–452.
  • 25 Churg AM. Lung biopsy, lung resection, and autopsy lung specimens. In: Churg AMMyers JLTazelaar HDWright JL, eds. Thurlbech’s pathology of the lung. New York, NY: Thieme, 2005; 95–108.
  • 26 Murata K, Khan A, Herman PG. Pulmonary parenchymal disease: evaluation with high-resolution CT. Radiology 1989;170(3 Pt 1):629–635.
  • 27 Akira M, Sakatani M, Ueda E. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: progression of honeycombing at thin-section CT. Radiology 1993;189(3):687–691.
  • 28 Silva CIS, Müller NL, Hansell DM, Lee KS, Nicholson AG, Wells AU. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: changes in pattern and distribution of disease over time. Radiology 2008;247(1):251–259.
  • 29 Sverzellati N, Wells AU, Tomassetti S, et al.. Biopsy-proved idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: spectrum of nondiagnostic thin-section CT diagnoses. Radiology 2010;254(3):957–964.
  • 30 Aziz ZA, Wells AU, Bateman ED, et al.. Interstitial lung disease: effects of thin-section CT on clinical decision making. Radiology 2006;238(2):725–733.
  • 31 Kligerman SJ, Groshong S, Brown KK, Lynch DA. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: radiologic, clinical, and pathologic considerations. RadioGraphics 2009;29(1):73–87.
  • 32 Akira M, Inoue Y, Kitaichi M, Yamamoto S, Arai T, Toyokawa K. Usual interstitial pneumonia and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia with and without concurrent emphysema: thin-section CT findings. Radiology 2009;251(1):271–279.
  • 33 Cottin V, Nunes H, Brillet PY, et al.. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a distinct underrecognised entity. Eur Respir J 2005;26(4):586–593.
  • 34 Grubstein A, Bendayan D, Schactman I, Cohen M, Shitrit D, Kramer MR. Concomitant upper-lobe bullous emphysema, lower-lobe interstitial fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension in heavy smokers: report of eight cases and review of the literature. Respir Med 2005;99(8):948–954.
  • 35 Doherty MJ, Pearson MG, O’Grady EA, Pellegrini V, Calverley PM. Cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis with preserved lung volumes. Thorax 1997;52(11):998–1002.
  • 36 Wiggins J, Strickland B, Turner-Warwick M. Combined cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and emphysema: the value of high resolution computed tomography in assessment. Respir Med 1990;84(5):365–369.

Article History

Received December 15, 2011; revision requested February 10, 2012; revision received July 16; accepted August 15; final version accepted September 5.
Published online: Mar 2013
Published in print: Mar 2013