Screening US in Patients with Mammographically Dense Breasts: Initial Experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41

References

• 1 Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225(1):165–175.
  Google Scholar
• 2 Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al.. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92(13):1081–1087.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Stomper PC, D’Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, Arredondo MA. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167(5):1261–1265.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4 Ikeda DM, Andersson I, Wattsgård C, Janzon L, Linell F. Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159(2):287–294.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5 Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004;230(1):29–41.
  Google Scholar
• 6 Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dünser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000;21(4):325–336.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7 Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al.. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18):2151–2163.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8 Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181(1):177–182.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9 Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review. Cancer 1995;76(4):626–630.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10 Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ferrari A, et al.. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. Eur J Cancer 2008;44(4):539–544.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 11 Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, et al.. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(6):1675–1679.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 12 Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001;221(3):641–649.
  Google Scholar
• 13 Kopans DB, Monsees B, Feig SA. Screening for cancer: when is it valid?—lessons from the mammography experience. Radiology 2003;229(2):319–327.
  Google Scholar
• 14 Kopans DB. Sonography should not be used for breast cancer screening until its efficacy has been proven scientifically. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(2):489–491.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15 National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/. Updated May 16, 2011. Accessed November 10, 2011.
  Google Scholar
• 16 Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196(1):123–134.
  Google Scholar
• 17 American College of Radiology. BI-RADS-ultrasound. In: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS Atlas). 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
  Google Scholar
• 18 Rinaldi P, Ierardi C, Costantini M, et al.. Cystic breast lesions: sonographic findings and clinical management. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29(11):1617–1626.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 National Government Services. National Government Services-Medicare Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Chicago, Ill: National Government Services, 1996–2012. http://www.ngsmedicare.com/wps/portal/ngsmedicare. Accessed February 23, 2012.
  Google Scholar
• 20 Hooley RJ, Andrejeva L, Scoutt LM. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Q 2011;27(1):23–47.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21 Kopans D. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.
  Google Scholar
• 22 Berg WA. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42(5):845–851, vi.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23 Berg WA, Sechtin AG, Marques H, Zhang Z. Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48(5):931–987.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 24 Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US—diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998;207(1):191–199.
  Google Scholar
• 25 Venta LA, Kim JP, Pelloski CE, Morrow M. Management of complex breast cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173(5):1331–1336.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26 Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dünser M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173(4):921–927.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27 Berg WA, Campassi CI, Ioffe OB. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 2003;227(1):183–191.
  Google Scholar
• 28 Chang YW, Kwon KH, Goo DE, Choi DL, Lee HK, Yang SB. Sonographic differentiation of benign and malignant cystic lesions of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26(1):47–53.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 29 Daly CP, Bailey JE, Klein KA, Helvie MA. Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy?. Acad Radiol 2008;15(5):610–617.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 30 Mainiero MB, Goldkamp A, Lazarus E, et al.. Characterization of breast masses with sonography: can biopsy of some solid masses be deferred?. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24(2):161–167.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31 Loving VA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Gutierrez RL, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Targeted ultrasound in women younger than 30 years with focal breast signs or symptoms: outcomes analyses and management implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(6):1472–1477.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32 Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA. Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?. Radiology 2007;244(1):87–93.
  Google Scholar