Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas versus Preinvasive Lesions Appearing as Ground-Glass Nodules: Differentiation by Using CT Features

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120949

In pure ground-glass nodules (GGNs), a lesion size of less than 10 mm can be a very specific discriminator of preinvasive lesions from invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas (IPAs) and in part-solid GGNs, preinvasive lesions can be accurately distinguished from IPAs by the smaller lesion size, smaller solid proportion, nonlobulated border, and nonspiculated margin.

Purpose

To retrospectively investigate the differentiating computed tomographic (CT) features between invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma (IPA) and preinvasive lesions appearing as ground-glass nodules (GGNs) in 253 patients.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the institutional review board. From January 2005 to October 2011, 272 GGNs were pathologically confirmed (179 IPAs and 93 preinvasive lesions) in 253 patients and were included in this study. There were 64 pure GGNs and 208 part-solid GGNs. Preinvasive lesions consisted of 21 atypical adenomatous hyperplasias and 72 adenocarcinomas in situ. To identify the differentiating CT features between IPAs and preinvasive lesions and to evaluate their differentiating accuracy, logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed, respectively.

Results

In pure GGNs, preinvasive lesions were significantly smaller and more frequently nonlobulated than IPAs (P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that lesion size was the single significant differentiator of preinvasive lesions from IPAs (P = .029). The optimal cut-off size for preinvasive lesions was less than 10 mm (sensitivity, 53.33%; specificity, 100%). In part-solid GGNs, there were significant differences in lesion size, solid portion size, solid proportion, margin, border, and pleural retraction between IPAs and preinvasive lesions (P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that smaller lesion size, smaller solid proportion, nonlobulated border, and nonspiculated margin were significant differentiators of preinvasive lesions (P < .05), with excellent differentiating accuracy (area under ROC curve, 0.905).

Conclusion

In pure GGNs, a lesion size of less than 10 mm can be a very specific discriminator of preinvasive lesions from IPAs. In part-solid GGNs, preinvasive lesions can be accurately distinguished from IPAs by the smaller lesion size, smaller solid proportion, nonlobulated border, and nonspiculated margin.

© RSNA, 2013

References

  • 1 Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al.. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6(2):244–285.
  • 2 Noguchi M, Morikawa A, Kawasaki M, et al.. Small adenocarcinoma of the lung: histologic characteristics and prognosis. Cancer 1995;75(12):2844–2852.
  • 3 Watanabe S, Watanabe T, Arai K, Kasai T, Haratake J, Urayama H. Results of wedge resection for focal bronchioloalveolar carcinoma showing pure ground-glass attenuation on computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73(4):1071–1075.
  • 4 Sakurai H, Dobashi Y, Mizutani E, et al.. Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma of the lung 3 centimeters or less in diameter: a prognostic assessment. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78(5):1728–1733.
  • 5 Koike T, Togashi K, Shirato T, et al.. Limited resection for noninvasive bronchioloalveolar carcinoma diagnosed by intraoperative pathologic examination. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88(4):1106–1111.
  • 6 Van Schil PE, Asamura H, Rusch VW, et al.. Surgical implications of the new IASLC/ATS/ERS adenocarcinoma classification. Eur Respir J 2012;39(2):478–486.
  • 7 El-Sherif A, Gooding WE, Santos R, et al.. Outcomes of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a 13-year analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82(2):408–415; discussion 415–416.
  • 8 Okada M, Koike T, Higashiyama M, Yamato Y, Kodama K, Tsubota N. Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132(4):769–775.
  • 9 Sugi K, Kobayashi S, Sudou M, Sakano H, Matsuda E, Okabe K. Long-term prognosis of video-assisted limited surgery for early lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37(2):456–460.
  • 10 Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, et al.. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(5):1053–1057.
  • 11 Nakata M, Saeki H, Takata I, et al.. Focal ground-glass opacity detected by low-dose helical CT. Chest 2002;121(5):1464–1467.
  • 12 Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, et al.. CT findings of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia in the lung. Korean J Radiol 2006;7(2):80–86.
  • 13 Kim HY, Shim YM, Lee KS, Han J, Yi CA, Kim YK. Persistent pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histopathologic comparisons. Radiology 2007;245(1):267–275.
  • 14 Lee HJ, Goo JM, Lee CH, Yoo CG, Kim YT, Im JG. Nodular ground-glass opacities on thin-section CT: size change during follow-up and pathological results. Korean J Radiol 2007;8(1):22–31.
  • 15 Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Lee CH, Chun EJ, Im JG. Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. RadioGraphics 2007;27(2):391–408.
  • 16 Goo JM, Park CM, Lee HJ. Ground-glass nodules on chest CT as imaging biomarkers in the management of lung adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(3):533–543.
  • 17 Lee HJ, Goo JM, Lee CH, et al.. Predictive CT findings of malignancy in ground-glass nodules on thin-section chest CT: the effects on radiologist performance. Eur Radiol 2009;19(3):552–560.
  • 18 Nomori H, Ohtsuka T, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Differentiating between atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma using the computed tomography number histogram. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76(3):867–871.
  • 19 Oda S, Awai K, Liu D, et al.. Ground-glass opacities on thin-section helical CT: differentiation between bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190(5):1363–1368.
  • 20 Ikeda K, Awai K, Mori T, Kawanaka K, Yamashita Y, Nomori H. Differential diagnosis of ground-glass opacity nodules: CT number analysis by three-dimensional computerized quantification. Chest 2007;132(3):984–990.
  • 21 Lee SM, Park CM, Paeng JC, et al.. Accuracy and predictive features of FDG-PET/CT and CT for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of T1 non-small-cell lung cancer manifesting as a subsolid nodule. Eur Radiol 2012;22(7):1556–1563.
  • 22 Godoy MC, Naidich DP. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology 2009;253(3):606–622.
  • 23 Kim HK, Choi YS, Kim K, et al.. Management of ground-glass opacity lesions detected in patients with otherwise operable non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4(10):1242–1246.
  • 24 Vazquez M, Carter D, Brambilla E, et al.. Solitaryand multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. Lung Cancer 2009;64(2):148–154.
  • 25 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–174.
  • 26 Nakata M, Sawada S, Saeki H, et al.. Prospective study of thoracoscopic limited resection for ground-glass opacity selected by computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75(5):1601–1605; discussion 1605–1606.
  • 27 Aoki T, Tomoda Y, Watanabe H, et al.. Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival. Radiology 2001;220(3):803–809.

Article History

Received May 7, 2012; revision requested June 27; revision received October 9; accepted December 14; final version accepted December 28.
Published online: July 2013
Published in print: July 2013