Pulmonary Nodules in Patients with Primary Malignancy: Comparison of Hybrid PET/MR and PET/CT Imaging

References

• 1 Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med 2007;48(Suppl 1):78S–88S.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 2 Facey K, Bradbury I, Laking G, Payne E. Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. Health Technol Assess 2007;11(44):iii–iv, xi–267.
  Google Scholar
• 3 Gambhir SS, Czernin J, Schwimmer J, Silverman DH, Coleman RE, Phelps ME. A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. J Nucl Med 2001;42(5 Suppl):1S–93S.
  Google Scholar
• 4 Poeppel TD, Krause BJ, Heusner TA, Boy C, Bockisch A, Antoch G. PET/CT for the staging and follow-up of patients with malignancies. Eur J Radiol 2009;70(3):382–392.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 5 Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M, et al.. First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med 2012;53(6):845–855.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 6 Schwenzer NF, Schraml C, Müller M, et al.. Pulmonary lesion assessment: comparison of whole-body hybrid MR/PET and PET/CT imaging—pilot study. Radiology 2012;264(2):551–558.
  Google Scholar
• 7 Werner MK, Schmidt H, Schwenzer NF. MR/PET: a new challenge in hybrid imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(2):272–277.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 8 Sieren JC, Ohno Y, Koyama H, Sugimura K, McLennan G. Recent technological and application developments in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for improved pulmonary nodule detection and lung cancer staging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32(6):1353–1369.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 9 Stolzmann P, Veit-Haibach P, Chuck N, et al.. Detection rate, location, and size of pulmonary nodules in trimodality PET/CT-MR: comparison of low-dose CT and Dixon-based MR imaging. Invest Radiol 2013;48(5):241–246.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 10 Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS, et al.. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA 2003;290(24):3199–3206.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 11 Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU, et al.. Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases. Radiology 2004;233(1):139–148.
  Google Scholar
• 12 Schäfer JF, Vollmar J, Schick F, et al.. Detection of pulmonary nodules with breath-hold magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with computed tomography [in German]. Rofo 2005;177(1):41–49.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 13 Bruegel M, Gaa J, Woertler K, et al.. MRI of the lung: value of different turbo spin-echo, single-shot turbo spin-echo, and 3D gradient-echo pulse sequences for the detection of pulmonary metastases. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25(1):73–81.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 14 Azevedo RM, de Campos RO, Ramalho M, Herédia V, Dale BM, Semelka RC. Free-breathing 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence with radial data sampling in abdominal MRI: preliminary observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(3):650–657.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 15 Chandarana H, Block TK, Rosenkrantz AB, et al.. Free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo sequence: a viable alternative for contrast-enhanced liver imaging in patients unable to suspend respiration. Invest Radiol 2011;46(10):648–653.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 16 DeMello LR, Rakheja R, Gilelmi C, Geppert C, Chandarana H, Friedman KP. Comparison of the accuracy of PET/CT and PET/MR spatial registration in multiple metastatic lesions [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2013.
  Google Scholar
• 17 Martinez-Möller A, Eiber M, Nekolla SG, et al.. Workflow and scan protocol considerations for integrated whole-body PET/MRI in oncology. J Nucl Med 2012;53(9):1415–1426.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 18 Wiesmüller M, Quick HH, Navalpakkam B, et al.. Comparison of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake between PET from a simultaneously acquiring whole-body PET/MR hybrid scanner and PET from PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40(1):12–21.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 19 Cheng G, Torigian DA, Zhuang H, Alavi A. When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40(5):779–787.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 20 Costantini DL, Vali R, Chan J, McQuattie S, Charron M. Dual-time-point FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of pediatric tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(2):408–413.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 21 Girvin F, Ko JP. Pulmonary nodules: detection, assessment, and CAD. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(4):1057–1069.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 22 Benjamin MS, Drucker EA, McLoud TC, Shepard JA. Small pulmonary nodules: detection at chest CT and outcome. Radiology 2003;226(2):489–493.
  Google Scholar
• 23 Schillaci O, Travascio L, Bolacchi F, et al.. Accuracy of early and delayed FDG PET-CT and of contrast-enhanced CT in the evaluation of lung nodules: a preliminary study on 30 patients. Radiol Med (Torino) 2009;114(6):890–906.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 24 Cistaro A, Lopci E, Gastaldo L, Fania P, Brach Del Prever A, Fagioli F. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the metabolic characterization of lung nodules in pediatric patients with bone sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012;59(7):1206–1210.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 25 Koyama H, Ohno Y, Kono A, et al.. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of non-contrast-enhanced pulmonary MR imaging for management of pulmonary nodules in 161 subjects. Eur Radiol 2008;18(10):2120–2131.
  Medline Google Scholar