Recanalization and Clinical Outcome of Occlusion Sites at Baseline CT Angiography in the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial

Published Online:

Significant differences were identified between treatment arms for 24-hour recanalization in proximal occlusions, with carotid T- and L-type and tandem internal carotid artery and M1 occlusions showing greater recanalization and a trend toward better outcome with endovascular treatment.


To use baseline computed tomographic (CT) angiography to analyze imaging and clinical end points in an Interventional Management of Stroke III cohort to identify patients who would benefit from endovascular stroke therapy.

Materials and Methods

The primary clinical end point was 90-day dichotomized modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary end points were 90-day mRS score distribution and 24-hour recanalization. Prespecified subgroup was baseline proximal occlusions (internal carotid, M1, or basilar arteries). Exploratory analyses were subsets with any occlusion and specific sites of occlusion (two-sided α = .01).


Of 656 subjects, 306 (47%) underwent baseline CT angiography or magnetic resonance angiography. Of 306, 282 (92%) had arterial occlusions. At baseline CT angiography, proximal occlusions (n = 220) demonstrated no difference in primary outcome (41.3% [62 of 150] endovascular vs 38% [27 of 70] intravenous [IV] tissue-plasminogen activator [tPA]; relative risk, 1.07 [99% confidence interval: 0.67, 1.70]; P = .70); however, 24-hour recanalization rate was higher for endovascular treatment (n = 167; 84.3% [97 of 115] endovascular vs 56% [29 of 52] IV tPA; P < .001). Exploratory subgroup analysis for any occlusion at baseline CT angiography did not demonstrate significant differences between endovascular and IV tPA arms for primary outcome (44.7% [85 of 190] vs 38% [35 of 92], P = .29), although ordinal shift analysis of full mRS distribution demonstrated a trend toward more favorable outcome (P = .011). Carotid T- or L-type occlusion (terminal internal carotid artery [ICA] with M1 middle cerebral artery and/or A1 anterior cerebral artery involvement) or tandem (extracranial or intracranial) ICA and M1 occlusion subgroup also showed a trend favoring endovascular treatment over IV tPA alone for primary outcome (26% [12 of 46] vs 4% [one of 23], P = .047).


Significant differences were identified between treatment arms for 24-hour recanalization in proximal occlusions; carotid T- or L-type and tandem ICA and M1 occlusions showed greater recanalization and a trend toward better outcome with endovascular treatment. Vascular imaging should be mandated in future endovascular trials to identify such occlusions.

© RSNA, 2014

Online supplemental material is available for this article.


  • 1. Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368(10):893–903. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Khatri P, Hill MD, Palesch YY, et al. Methodology of the Interventional Management of Stroke III trial. Int J Stroke 2008;3(2):130–137. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. De Silva DA, Brekenfeld C, Ebinger M, et al. The benefits of intravenous thrombolysis relate to the site of baseline arterial occlusion in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET). Stroke 2010;41(2):295–299. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Dzialowski I, Puetz V, Buchan AM, Demchuk AM, Hill MD; Calgary Stroke Program. Does the application of x-ray contrast agents impair the clinical effect of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke patients? Stroke 2012;43(6):1567–1571. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Dehmer GJ, Gresalfi N, Daly D, Oberhardt B, Tate DA. Impairment of fibrinolysis by streptokinase, urokinase and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in the presence of radiographic contrast agents. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25(5):1069–1075. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Pislaru S, Pislaru C, Szilard M, Arnout J, Van de Werf F. In vivo effects of contrast media on coronary thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32(4):1102–1108. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. del Zoppo GJ, Poeck K, Pessin MS, et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute thrombotic and embolic stroke. Ann Neurol 1992;32(1):78–86. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Saqqur M, Uchino K, Demchuk AM, et al. Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke 2007;38(3):948–954. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Zangerle A, Kiechl S, Spiegel M, et al. Recanalization after thrombolysis in stroke patients: predictors and prognostic implications. Neurology 2007;68(1):39–44. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Bhatia R, Hill MD, Shobha N, et al. Low rates of acute recanalization with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in ischemic stroke: real-world experience and a call for action. Stroke 2010;41(10):2254–2258. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Hirano T, Sasaki M, Mori E, et al. Residual vessel length on magnetic resonance angiography identifies poor responders to alteplase in acute middle cerebral artery occlusion patients: exploratory analysis of the Japan Alteplase Clinical Trial II. Stroke 2010;41(12):2828–2833. Google Scholar
  • 12. Linfante I, Llinas RH, Selim M, et al. Clinical and vascular outcome in internal carotid artery versus middle cerebral artery occlusions after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke 2002;33(8):2066–2071. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Saarinen JT, Sillanpää N, Rusanen H, et al. The mid-M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery is a cutoff clot location for good outcome in intravenous thrombolysis. Eur J Neurol 2012;19(8):1121–1127. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Paciaroni M, Balucani C, Agnelli G, et al. Systemic thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and Internal Carotid ARtery Occlusion: the ICARO study. Stroke 2012;43(1):125–130. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Mokin M, Kass-Hout T, Kass-Hout O, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with internal carotid artery occlusion: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. Stroke 2012;43(9):2362–2368. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Flint AC, Duckwiler GR, Budzik RF, Liebeskind DS, Smith WS; MERCI and Multi MERCI Writing Committee. Mechanical thrombectomy of intracranial internal carotid occlusion: pooled results of the MERCI and Multi MERCI Part I trials. Stroke 2007;38(4):1274–1280. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Toyota S, Sugiura S, Iwaisako K. Simultaneous combined intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and endovascular therapy for hyperacute middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17(1):115–122. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Cohen JE, Rabinstein AA, Ramirez-de-Noriega F, et al. Excellent rates of recanalization and good functional outcome after stent-based thrombectomy for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. Is it time for a paradigm shift? J Clin Neurosci 2013;20(9):1219–1223. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Wardlaw JM, von Kummer R, Carpenter T, et al. Protocol for the perfusion and angiography imaging sub-study of the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) of alteplase treatment within six-hours of acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke 2013 Jan 22. [Epub ahead of print] Google Scholar
  • 20. Morais LT, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Lev MH, Albers GW, Yoo AJ. Imaging-based selection for intra-arterial stroke therapies. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(Suppl 1):i13–i20. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Demchuk AM, Menon B, Goyal M. Imaging-based selection in acute ischemic stroke trials - a quest for imaging sweet spots. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012;1268:63–71. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Abou-Chebl A, Lin R, Hussain MS, et al. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke: preliminary results from a retrospective, multicenter study. Stroke 2010;41(6):1175–1179. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Mazighi M, Chaudhry SA, Ribo M, et al. Impact of onset-to-reperfusion time on stroke mortality: a collaborative pooled analysis. Circulation 2013;127(19):1980–1985. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Jayaraman MV, Grossberg JA, Meisel KM, Shaikhouni A, Silver B. The clinical and radiographic importance of distinguishing partial from near-complete reperfusion following intra-arterial stroke therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34(1):135–139. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received November 25, 2013; revision requested December 23; revision received March 17, 2014; accepted March 25; final version accepted April 11.
Published online: June 05 2014
Published in print: Oct 2014