Hepatic MR Elastography: Clinical Performance in a Series of 1377 Consecutive Examinations
Abstract
With a technical failure rate of less than 5.6%, the use of hepatic MR elastography to assess changes in liver tissue mechanics, which are associated with many pathophysiologic factors, may yield important information regarding staging of liver disease without invasive biopsy.
Purpose
To assess the technical success rate and diagnostic performance of liver magnetic resonance (MR) elastography.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board with patient informed consent. A total of 1377 consecutive MR elastography examinations performed between 2007 and 2010 in 1287 patients for clinical indications were included. Medical records were used to retrieve liver stiffness as assessed with MR elastography, histologic analysis, blood work, and other liver disease–related information. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests and analysis of covariance methods were used to evaluate the diagnostic values and relationships of the collected data.
Results
Hepatic MR elastography had a success rate of 94.4% (1300 of 1377 cases) and yielded reproducible measurements (r = 0.9716, P < .0001) in the study cohort, with a complex patient profile and multiple interpreters. Body mass index had no significant effect on success rate (P = .2). In 289 patients who underwent liver biopsy within 1 year of the MR elastography date, mean liver stiffness as assessed with MR elastography was significantly higher in patients with advanced fibrosis (stages F3, F4) than in those with mild to moderate fibrosis (stages F0, F1, F2) (5.93 kPa ± 2.31 [standard deviation] vs 3.35 kPa ± 1.44, P < .0001). Liver stiffness is associated with many factors other than fibrosis extent, including cause of fibrosis (viral hepatitis C vs nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, P = .025), inflammation (severe vs mild to moderate, P = .03), and hepatic metabolic and synthetic function (no fibrosis vs intermediate fibrosis, P ≤ .01).
Conclusion
In a general clinical practice environment, hepatic MR elastography is a robust imaging method with a high success rate in a broad spectrum of patients. It also shows the complex association between liver stiffness and hepatic pathophysiology.
© RSNA, 2015
References
- 1. . Hepatic fibrosis: overview. Toxicology 2008;254(3):120–129.
- 2. . Hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. Compr Physiol 2013;3(4):1473–1492.
- 3. . Liver fibrosis: mechanisms of immune-mediated liver injury. Cell Mol Immunol 2012;9(4):296–301.
- 4. . Pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. Annu Rev Pathol 2011;6:425–456.
- 5. . Clinical evidence for the regression of liver fibrosis. J Hepatol 2012;56(5):1171–1180.
- 6. . Models and mechanisms of fibrosis resolution. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2011;35(5):794–799.
- 7. . Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97(10):2614–2618.
- 8. . Needle biopsy of the liver: an appraisal of its diagnostic indications and limitations. Ann Intern Med 1954;40(6):1177–1193.
- 9. . Non-invasive evaluation of liver cirrhosis using ultrasound. Clin Radiol 2009;64(11):1056–1066.
- 10. . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Radiology 2010;254(1):47–66.
- 11. . Hepatic perfusion imaging: concepts and application. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010;18(3):465–475, x.
- 12. . Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy accurately estimate the severity of steatosis provided the stage of fibrosis is considered. J Hepatol 2009;51(2):389–397.
- 13. . Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic fibrosis: emerging clinical applications. Hepatology 2008;47(1):332–342.
- 14. . Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: parametric assessments beyond morphology. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010;18(3):565–585, xii.
- 15. . Functional MR imaging as a new paradigm for image guidance. Abdom Imaging 2009;34(6):675–685.
- 16. . Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29(12):1705–1713.
- 17. . Shear modulus imaging with 2-D transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2002;49(4):426–435.
- 18. . Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5(10):1207–1213, e2.
- 19. . Improvements in hepatic stiffness assessment with 3-D/3-axis MR elastography [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2010; 2582.
- 20. . Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 2006;19(2):173–179.
- 21. . Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity. Phys Med Biol 2007;52(24):7281–7294.
- 22. . Test-retest repeatability of MR elastography for noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in hepatitis C. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34(4):947–955.
- 23. . Effects of postprandial state and mesenteric blood flow on the repeatability of MR elastography in asymptomatic subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33(1):239–244.
- 24. . Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography. Radiology 2011;259(3):749–756.
- 25. . Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal 2001;5(4):237–254.
- 26. . Spatio-temporal directional filtering for improved inversion of MR elastography images. Med Image Anal 2003;7(4):465–473.
- 27. . Dynamic postprandial hepatic stiffness augmentation assessed with MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(1):64–70.
- 28. . Automated liver stiffness measurements with magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38(2):371–379.
- 29. . An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C: the METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology 1996;24(2):289–293.
- 30. . Grading and staging systems for inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 2007;47(4):598–607.
- 31. . Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94(9):2467–2474.
- 32. . Improved T2* assessment in liver iron overload by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27(2):188–197.
- 33. . Rapid acquisition of multifrequency, multislice and multidirectional MR elastography data with a fractionally encoded gradient echo sequence. NMR Biomed 2013;26(10):1326–1335.
- 34. . Comparison of interobserver agreement of magnetic resonance elastography with histopathological staging of liver fibrosis. Abdom Imaging 2014;39(2):283–290.
- 35. . MR elastography of liver fibrosis: preliminary results comparing spin-echo and echo-planar imaging. Eur Radiol 2008;18(11):2535–2541.
- 36. . Estimation of the absolute shear stiffness of human lung parenchyma using (1) H spin echo, echo planar MR elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40(5):1230–1237.
- 37. . Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index. Radiology 2007;245(2):458–466.
- 38. . Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by transient elastography in post transfusional iron overload. Eur J Haematol 2008;80(4):337–340.
- 39. . Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in thalassaemia major patients by transient elastography (TE): lack of interference by iron deposition. Br J Haematol 2010;148(3):476–479.
- 40. . Liver fibrosis in type I Gaucher disease: magnetic resonance imaging, transient elastography and parameters of iron storage. PLoS ONE 2013;8(3):e57507.
- 41. . Diffraction-biased shear wave fields generated with longitudinal magnetic resonance elastography drivers. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26(6):770–780.
- 42. . Diffraction field of a low frequency vibrator in soft tissues using transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1999;46(4):1013–1019.
- 43. . Factors associated with unreliable liver stiffness measurement and its failure with transient elastography in the Chinese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26(2):300–305.
- 44. . Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology 2010;51(3):828–835.
- 45. . Liver stiffness measurement using XL probe in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107(12):1862–1871.
- 46. . Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement: comparison between M and XL probe of FibroScan®. J Hepatol 2012;56(4):833–839.
- 47. . Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with transient elastography (FibroScan®): applying the cut-offs of M probe to XL probe. Ann Hepatol 2013;12(4):570–580.
- 48. . Discordance in fibrosis staging between liver biopsy and transient elastography using the FibroScan XL probe. J Hepatol 2012;56(3):564–570.
- 49. . Liver stiffness values in apparently healthy subjects: influence of gender and metabolic syndrome. J Hepatol 2008;48(4):606–613.
- 50. . MR elastography of healthy liver parenchyma: Normal value and reliability of the liver stiffness value measurement. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38(5):1215–1223.
- 51. . Clinical features of genetic hemochromatosis in women compared with men. Ann Intern Med 1997;127(2):105–110.
- 52. . MR elastography. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008;32(6 Suppl 1):68–72.
- 53. . Early detection of steatohepatitis in fatty rat liver by using MR elastography. Radiology 2009;253(1):90–97.
- 54. . A mathematical model for brain edema: the relationship between brain tissue water content and intracranial pressure. Med Hypotheses 1992;37(2):63–64.
- 55. . Mechanical stretch induces matrix metalloproteinase 1 production in human hepatic stellate cells. Pathophysiology 2004;11(3):153–158.
- 56. . Mechanical stretch induces TGF-beta synthesis in hepatic stellate cells. Eur J Clin Invest 2004;34(2):129–136.
- 57. . Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver diseases. Hepatology 2006;44(6):1511–1517.
- 58. . Etiology-related determinants of liver stiffness values in chronic viral hepatitis B or C. J Hepatol 2011;54(4):621–628.
- 59. . Are different cut-off values of liver stiffness assessed by transient elastography according to the etiology of liver cirrhosis for predicting significant esophageal varices? Med Ultrason 2013;15(2):111–115.
- 60. . Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C. Eur Radiol 2014;24(3):638–648.
- 61. . Cross-validation of MR elastography and ultrasound transient elastography in liver stiffness measurement: discrepancy in the results of cirrhotic liver. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35(3):607–610.
- 62. . Cross-validation of magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound-based transient elastography: a preliminary phantom study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30(5):1145–1150.
- 63. . Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology 2009;252(2):595–604.
- 64. . Acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging and transient elastography for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis in NAFLD. Eur J Radiol 2012;81(3):e325–e331.
- 65. . Liver elasticity and viscosity quantification using shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV). Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;2009:2252–2255.
- 66. . 3D multislab, multishot acquisition for fast, whole-brain MR elastography with high signal-to-noise efficiency. Magn Reson Med 2014;71(2):477–485.
- 67. . Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41(2):369–375.
- 68. . Validity study of spin echo EPI based hepatic MR elastography at 3.0T [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2010; 639.
Article History
Received September 6, 2014; revision requested October 16; revision received March 30, 2015; accepted April 9; final version accepted May 1.Published online: July 08 2015
Published in print: Jan 2016