Clinical Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion MR Imaging: Past, Present, and Future

References

• 1. Einstein A. Investigations on the theory of the Brownian movement. Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications, 1956.
  Google Scholar
• 2. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161(2):401–407.
  Google Scholar
• 3. Le Bihan D. Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MR imaging: a wake-up call. Radiology 2008;249(3):748–752.
  Google Scholar
• 4. Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Van Cauteren M. Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med 2004;22(4):275–282.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5. Perrin J. Mouvement brownien et réalité moléculaire. Ann Chim Phys 1909;18(8):5–114.
  Google Scholar
• 6. Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function. Neuroimage 2012;61(2):324–341.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7. Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13(4):534–546.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8. Le Bihan D, Breton E. Imagerie de diffusion in-vivo par résonance magnétique nucléaire. C R Acad Sci (Paris) 1985;301(15):1109–1112.
  Google Scholar
• 9. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 1994;66(1):259–267.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10. Eyal E, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Furman-Haran E, et al. Parametric diffusion tensor imaging of the breast. Invest Radiol 2012;47(5):284–291.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 11. Notohamiprodjo M, Glaser C, Herrmann KA, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the kidney with parallel imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 2008;43(10):677–685.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 12. Le Bihan D. The ‘wet mind’: water and functional neuroimaging. Phys Med Biol 2007;52(7):R57–R90.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13. Yablonskiy DA, Sukstanskii AL. Theoretical models of the diffusion weighted MR signal. NMR Biomed 2010;23(7):661–681.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14. Le Bihan D. Apparent diffusion coefficient and beyond: what diffusion MR imaging can tell us about tissue structure. Radiology 2013;268(2):318–322.
  Google Scholar
• 15. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988;168(2):497–505.
  Google Scholar
• 16. Iima M, Yano K, Kataoka M, et al. Quantitative non-Gaussian diffusion and intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Invest Radiol 2015;50(4):205–211.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17. Dixon WT. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging: a modest proposal with tremendous potential. Radiology 1988;168(2):566–567.
  Google Scholar
• 18. High WA, Ayers RA, Cowper SE. Gadolinium is quantifiable within the tissue of patients with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56(4):710–712.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19. ACR Manual on Contrast Media. http://www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/Contrast%20Manual/2013_Contrast_Media.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed May 15, 2015.
  Google Scholar
• 20. Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, Kitajima K, Takenaka D. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology 2014;270(3):834–841.
  Google Scholar
• 21. Notohamiprodjo M, Chandarana H, Mikheev A, et al. Combined intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion tensor imaging of renal diffusion and flow anisotropy. Magn Reson Med 2015;73(4):1526–1532.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22. Pyatigorskaya N, Le Bihan D, Reynaud O, Ciobanu L. Relationship between the diffusion time and the diffusion MRI signal observed at 17.2 Tesla in the healthy rat brain cortex. Magn Reson Med 2014;72(2):492–500.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23. McNab JA, Edlow BL, Witzel T, et al. The Human Connectome Project and beyond: initial applications of 300 mT/m gradients. Neuroimage 2013;80:234–245.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 24. Chabert S, Meca C, Le Bihan D. Relevance of the information about the diffusion distribution in vivo given by kurtosis in q-space imaging [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004;1238.
  Google Scholar
• 25. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53(6):1432–1440.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26. Mulkern RV, Haker SJ, Maier SE. On high b diffusion imaging in the human brain: ruminations and experimental insights. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27(8):1151–1162.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27. Yablonskiy DA, Bretthorst GL, Ackerman JJ. Statistical model for diffusion attenuated MR signal. Magn Reson Med 2003;50(4):664–669.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28. Bennett KM, Schmainda KM, Bennett RT, Rowe DB, Lu H, Hyde JS. Characterization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched-exponential model. Magn Reson Med 2003;50(4):727–734.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 29. Hall MG, Barrick TR. From diffusion-weighted MRI to anomalous diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2008;59(3):447–455.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 30. Zhou XJ, Gao Q, Abdullah O, Magin RL. Studies of anomalous diffusion in the human brain using fractional order calculus. Magn Reson Med 2010;63(3):562–569.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31. Grinberg F, Farrher E, Ciobanu L, Geffroy F, Le Bihan D, Shah NJ. Non-Gaussian diffusion imaging for enhanced contrast of brain tissue affected by ischemic stroke. PLoS One 2014;9(2):e89225.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32. Anderson SW, Barry B, Soto J, Ozonoff A, O’Brien M, Jara H. Characterizing non-gaussian, high b-value diffusion in liver fibrosis: stretched exponential and diffusional kurtosis modeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39(4):827–834.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 33. Yuan J, Yeung DK, Mok GS, et al. Non-Gaussian analysis of diffusion weighted imaging in head and neck at 3T: a pilot study in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e87024.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 34. Filli L, Wurnig M, Nanz D, Luechinger R, Kenkel D, Boss A. Whole-body diffusion kurtosis imaging: initial experience on non-Gaussian diffusion in various organs. Invest Radiol 2014;49(12):773–778.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 35. Assaf Y, Basser PJ. Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 2005;27(1):48–58.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 36. Assaf Y, Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Yovel Y, Basser PJ. AxCaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2008;59(6):1347–1354.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 37. Zhang H, Schneider T, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Alexander DC. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 2012;61(4):1000–1016.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 38. Gudbjartsson H, Patz S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med 1995;34(6):910–914.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 39. Aja-Fernández S, Tristán-Vega A, Hoge WS. Statistical noise analysis in GRAPPA using a parametrized noncentral Chi approximation model. Magn Reson Med 2011;65(4):1195–1206.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 40. Brion V, Poupon C, Riff O, et al. Parallel MRI noise correction: an extension of the LMMSE to non central chi distributions. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2011;14(Pt 2):226–233.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 41. Constantinides CD, Atalar E, McVeigh ER. Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38(5):852–857.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 42. Koay CG, Basser PJ. Analytically exact correction scheme for signal extraction from noisy magnitude MR signals. J Magn Reson 2006;179(2):317–322.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 43. Tofts PS, Lloyd D, Clark CA, et al. Test liquids for quantitative MRI measurements of self-diffusion coefficient in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2000;43(3):368–374.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 44. Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Mintorovitch J, et al. Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1990;14(2):330–346.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 45. Schlaug G, Siewert B, Benfield A, Edelman RR, Warach S. Time course of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormality in human stroke. Neurology 1997;49(1):113–119.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 46. Sotak CH. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of ischemic brain injury - a review. NMR Biomed 2002;15(7-8):561–569.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 47. Norris DG, Niendorf T, Leibfritz D. Health and infarcted brain tissues studied at short diffusion times: the origins of apparent restriction and the reduction in apparent diffusion coefficient. NMR Biomed 1994;7(7):304–310.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 48. Warach S, Boska M, Welch KM. Pitfalls and potential of clinical diffusion-weighted MR imaging in acute stroke. Stroke 1997;28(3):481–482.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 49. Warach S, Dashe JF, Edelman RR. Clinical outcome in ischemic stroke predicted by early diffusion-weighted and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16(1):53–59.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 50. Lövblad KO, Baird AE, Schlaug G, et al. Ischemic lesion volumes in acute stroke by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical outcome. Ann Neurol 1997;42(2):164–170.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 51. González RG, Schaefer PW, Buonanno FS, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset. Radiology 1999;210(1):155–162.
  Google Scholar
• 52. Dreher W, Kühn B, Gyngell ML, et al. Temporal and regional changes during focal ischemia in rat brain studied by proton spectroscopic imaging and quantitative diffusion NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med 1998;39(6):878–888.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 53. Cheung JS, Wang E, Lo EH, Sun PZ. Stratification of heterogeneous diffusion MRI ischemic lesion with kurtosis imaging: evaluation of mean diffusion and kurtosis MRI mismatch in an animal model of transient focal ischemia. Stroke 2012;43(8):2252–2254.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 54. Federau C, Sumer S, Becce F, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion imaging in acute stroke: initial clinical experience. Neuroradiology 2014;56(8):629–635.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 55. Federau C, Hagmann P, Maeder P, et al. Dependence of brain intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion parameters on the cardiac cycle. PLoS One 2013;8(8):e72856.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 56. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hastreiter P, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative diffusion tensor imaging-based fiber tracking in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery 2005;56(1):130–137; discussion 138.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 57. Shizukuishi T, Abe O, Aoki S. Diffusion tensor imaging analysis for psychiatric disorders. Magn Reson Med Sci 2013;12(3):153–159.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 58. Rovaris M, Gass A, Bammer R, et al. Diffusion MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2005;65(10):1526–1532.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 59. Balasubramanya KS, Kovoor JM, Jayakumar PN, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging and proton MR spectroscopy in the characterization of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Neuroradiology 2007;49(2):177–183.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 60. Balashov KE, Aung LL, Dhib-Jalbut S, Keller IA. Acute multiple sclerosis lesion: conversion of restricted diffusion due to vasogenic edema. J Neuroimaging 2011;21(2):202–204.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 61. Bodini B, Cercignani M, Khaleeli Z, et al. Corpus callosum damage predicts disability progression and cognitive dysfunction in primary-progressive MS after five years. Hum Brain Mapp 2013;34(5):1163–1172.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 62. Rueda Lopes FC, Doring T, Martins C, et al. The role of demyelination in neuromyelitis optica damage: diffusion-tensor MR imaging study. Radiology 2012;263(1):235–242.
  Google Scholar
• 63. Shenton ME, Hamoda HM, Schneiderman JS, et al. A review of magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 2012;6(2):137–192.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 64. Alhilali LM, Yaeger K, Collins M, Fakhran S. Detection of central white matter injury underlying vestibulopathy after mild traumatic brain injury. Radiology 2014;272(1):224–232.
  Google Scholar
• 65. Chong CD, Schwedt TJ. White matter damage and brain network alterations in concussed patients: a review of recent diffusion tensor imaging and resting-state functional connectivity data. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2015;19(5):485.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 66. Patterson DM, Padhani AR, Collins DJ. Technology insight: water diffusion MRI—a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2008;5(4):220–233.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 67. Toledano-Massiah S, Luciani A, Itti E, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging in Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. RadioGraphics 2015;35(3):747–764.
  Google Scholar
• 68. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 2009;11(2):102–125.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 69. Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16(2):172–178.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 70. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9(1):53–60.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 71. Humphries PD, Sebire NJ, Siegel MJ, Olsen ØE. Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity. Radiology 2007;245(3):848–854.
  Google Scholar
• 72. Iima M, Reynaud O, Tsurugizawa T, et al. Characterization of glioma microcirculation and tissue features using intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in a rat brain model. Invest Radiol 2014;49(7):485–490.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 73. Fan G, Zang P, Jing F, Wu Z, Guo Q. Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI in rat gliomas: correlation with histopathology. Acad Radiol 2005;12(5):640–651.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 74. Turkbey B, Shah VP, Pang Y, et al. Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? Radiology 2011;258(2):488–495.
  Google Scholar
• 75. Nakajo M, Kajiya Y, Kaneko T, et al. FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer: prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake values and apparent diffusion coefficient values of the primary lesion. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37(11):2011–2020.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 76. Koh DM, Scurr E, Collins D, et al. Predicting response of colorectal hepatic metastasis: value of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(4):1001–1008.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 77. Cui Y, Zhang XP, Sun YS, Tang L, Shen L. Apparent diffusion coefficient: potential imaging biomarker for prediction and early detection of response to chemotherapy in hepatic metastases. Radiology 2008;248(3):894–900.
  Google Scholar
• 78. Sun YS, Zhang XP, Tang L, et al. Locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy: preliminary analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for early detection of tumor histopathologic downstaging. Radiology 2010;254(1):170–178.
  Google Scholar
• 79. Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, et al. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: correlation between MR findings and histologic grade. Radiology 2006;241(3):702–709.
  Google Scholar
• 80. Higano S, Yun X, Kumabe T, et al. Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis. Radiology 2006;241(3):839–846.
  Google Scholar
• 81. Lee HJ, Rha SY, Chung YE, et al. Tumor perfusion-related parameter of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with histological microvessel density. Magn Reson Med 2014;71(4):1554–1558.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 82. Federau C, Meuli R, O’Brien K, Maeder P, Hagmann P. Perfusion measurement in brain gliomas with intravoxel incoherent motion MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35(2):256–262.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 83. Kim HS, Suh CH, Kim N, Choi CG, Kim SJ. Histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion for differentiating recurrent tumor from treatment effect in patients with glioblastoma: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35(3):490–497.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 84. Chandarana H, Kang SK, Wong S, et al. Diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of renal tumors with histopathologic correlation. Invest Radiol 2012;47(12):688–696.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 85. Fujima N, Yoshida D, Sakashita T, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: assessment of perfusion-related parameters compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2014;32(10):1206–1213.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 86. Suo S, Lin N, Wang H, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 tesla: comparison of different curve-fitting methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42(2):362–370.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 87. Padhani AR, Koh DM, Collins DJ. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cancer: current status and research directions. Radiology 2011;261(3):700–718.
  Google Scholar
• 88. Yamasaki F, Kurisu K, Satoh K, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging. Radiology 2005;235(3):985–991.
  Google Scholar
• 89. Bulakbasi N, Guvenc I, Onguru O, Erdogan E, Tayfun C, Ucoz T. The added value of the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation to magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation and grading of malignant brain tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28(6):735–746.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 90. Assaf Y, Pasternak O. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based white matter mapping in brain research: a review. J Mol Neurosci 2008;34(1):51–61.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 91. Chenevert TL, Stegman LD, Taylor JM, et al. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92(24):2029–2036.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 92. Hamstra DA, Chenevert TL, Moffat BA, et al. Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102(46):16759–16764.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 93. Hu YC, Yan LF, Wu L, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of gliomas: efficacy in preoperative grading. Sci Rep 2014;4:7208.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 94. Zulfiqar M, Yousem DM, Lai H. ADC values and prognosis of malignant astrocytomas: does lower ADC predict a worse prognosis independent of grade of tumor?—a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(3):624–629.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 95. Waldman AD, Jackson A, Price SJ, et al. Quantitative imaging biomarkers in neuro-oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009;6(8):445–454.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 96. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 2012;263(1):19–32.
  Google Scholar
• 97. Koyasu S, Iima M, Umeoka S, et al. The clinical utility of reduced-distortion readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the head and neck region: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2014;24(12):3088–3096.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 98. Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, Obara M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T. Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 2012;263(3):770–777.
  Google Scholar
• 99. Sumi M, Nakamura T. Head and neck tumours: combined MRI assessment based on IVIM and TIC analyses for the differentiation of tumors of different histological types. Eur Radiol 2014;24(1):223–231.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 100. Sumi M, Nakamura T. Head and neck tumors: assessment of perfusion-related parameters and diffusion coefficients based on the intravoxel incoherent motion model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34(2):410–416.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 101. Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Vander Poorten V, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging. Radiology 2009;251(1):134–146.
  Google Scholar
• 102. Lu Y, Jansen JF, Stambuk HE, et al. Comparing primary tumors and metastatic nodes in head and neck cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging: a preliminary experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013;37(3):346–352.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 103. Kim S, Loevner L, Quon H, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(3):986–994.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 104. Vandecaveye V, Dirix P, De Keyzer F, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging early after chemoradiotherapy to monitor treatment response in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82(3):1098–1107.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 105. Tshering Vogel DW, Zbaeren P, Geretschlaeger A, Vermathen P, De Keyzer F, Thoeny HC. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging including bi-exponential fitting for the detection of recurrent or residual tumour after (chemo)radiotherapy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Eur Radiol 2013;23(2):562–569.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 106. Barral M, Taouli B, Guiu B, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the pancreas: current status and recommendations. Radiology 2015;274(1):45–63.
  Google Scholar
• 107. Lee SS, Byun JH, Park BJ, et al. Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: usefulness in characterizing solid pancreatic masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28(4):928–936.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 108. Re TJ, Lemke A, Klauss M, et al. Enhancing pancreatic adenocarcinoma delineation in diffusion derived intravoxel incoherent motion f-maps through automatic vessel and duct segmentation. Magn Reson Med 2011;66(5):1327–1332.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 109. Klauss M, Lemke A, Grünberg K, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for the differentiation between mass forming chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Invest Radiol 2011;46(1):57–63.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 110. Concia M, Sprinkart AM, Penner AH, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: diagnostic benefit from an intravoxel incoherent motion model-based 3 b-value analysis. Invest Radiol 2014;49(2):93–100.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 111. Kang KM, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Kiefer B, Han JK, Choi BI. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterization of focal pancreatic lesions. Radiology 2014;270(2):444–453.
  Google Scholar
• 112. Johnson LM, Turkbey B, Figg WD, Choyke PL. Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014;11(6):346–353.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 113. Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, et al. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Radiology 2012;264(1):126–135.
  Google Scholar
• 114. Mazzoni LN, Lucarini S, Chiti S, Busoni S, Gori C, Menchi I. Diffusion-weighted signal models in healthy and cancerous peripheral prostate tissues: comparison of outcomes obtained at different b-values. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39(3):512–518.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 115. Shinmoto H, Oshio K, Tanimoto A, et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27(3):355–359.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 116. Shinmoto H, Oshio K, Tamura C, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using a statistical model based on the gamma distribution. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42(1):56–62.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 117. Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Stieltjes B, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion imaging in prostate cancer: what does it add? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2014;38(4):558–564.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 118. Pang Y, Turkbey B, Bernardo M, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: an evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinations. Magn Reson Med 2013;69(2):553–562.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 119. Zhang YD, Wang Q, Wu CJ, et al. The histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for differentiating the gleason grade of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 2015;25(4):994–1004.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 120. Anderson AW, Gore JC. Analysis and correction of motion artifacts in diffusion weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994;32(3):379–387.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 121. Döpfert J, Lemke A, Weidner A, Schad LR. Investigation of prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29(8):1053–1058.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 122. Mazaheri Y, Vargas HA, Akin O, Goldman DA, Hricak H. Reducing the influence of b-value selection on diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: evaluation of a revised monoexponential model within a clinical setting. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35(3):660–668.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 123. Riches SF, Hawtin K, Charles-Edwards EM, de Souza NM. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients. NMR Biomed 2009;22(3):318–325.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 124. Shinmoto H, Tamura C, Soga S, et al. An intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging study of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(4):W496–W500.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 125. Dorrius MD, Dijkstra H, Oudkerk M, Sijens PE. Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2014;24(11):2835–2847.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 126. Liu C, Liang C, Liu Z, Zhang S, Huang B. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI. Eur J Radiol 2013;82(12):e782–e789.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 127. Bokacheva L, Kaplan JB, Giri DD, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast parenchyma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40(4):813–823.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 128. Sigmund EE, Cho GY, Kim S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer. Magn Reson Med 2011;65(5):1437–1447.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 129. Wu D, Li G, Zhang J, Chang S, Hu J, Dai Y. Characterization of breast tumors using diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). PLoS One 2014;9(11):e113240.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 130. Tamura T, Usui S, Murakami S, et al. Biexponential signal attenuation analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast. Magn Reson Med Sci 2010;9(4):195–207.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 131. Iima M, Kataoka M, Umehana M, et al. Computer-assisted diagnosis of breast lesions based on IVIM and non Gaussian diffusion MRI [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2014.
  Google Scholar
• 132. Nogueira L, Brandão S, Matos E, et al. Application of the diffusion kurtosis model for the study of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2014;24(6):1197–1203.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 133. Rosen PP. Rosen’s breast pathology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009; 194–195.
  Google Scholar
• 134. Norddin N, Power C, Watson G, et al. Microscopic diffusion properties of fixed breast tissue: preliminary findings. Magn Reson Med 2014 Dec 17. [Epub ahead of print]
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 135. Cheng L, Bai Y, Zhang J, et al. Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement. Tumour Biol 2013;34(3):1537–1545.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 136. Iima M, Le Bihan D, Okumura R, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study. Radiology 2011;260(2):364–372.
  Google Scholar
• 137. Kwee TC, Takahara T, Luijten PR, Nievelstein RA. ADC measurements of lymph nodes: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility study and an overview of the literature. Eur J Radiol 2010;75(2):215–220.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 138. Scaranelo AM, Eiada R, Jacks LM, Kulkarni SR, Crystal P. Accuracy of unenhanced MR imaging in the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis: study of reproducibility and reliability. Radiology 2012;262(2):425–434.
  Google Scholar
• 139. Fornasa F, Nesoti MV, Bovo C, Bonavina MG. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36(4):858–864.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 140. Kamitani T, Hatakenaka M, Yabuuchi H, et al. Detection of axillary node metastasis using diffusion-weighted MRI in breast cancer. Clin Imaging 2013;37(1):56–61.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 141. Luo N, Su D, Jin G, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio between axillary lymph node with primary tumor to detect nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38(4):824–828.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 142. Gould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD, et al. Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007;132(3 Suppl):108S–130S.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 143. Liu H, Liu Y, Yu T, Ye N, Wang Q. Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient associated with pathological grade of lung carcinoma, before therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014 Dec 24. [Epub ahead of print]
  Google Scholar
• 144. Reischauer C, Froehlich JM, Pless M, Binkert CA, Koh DM, Gutzeit A. Early treatment response in non-small cell lung cancer patients using diffusion-weighted imaging and functional diffusion maps: a feasibility study. PLoS One 2014;9(10):e108052.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 145. Chen L, Zhang J, Bao J, et al. Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnosis of lung lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;37(6):1351–1358.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 146. Li B, Li Q, Chen C, Guan Y, Liu S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI in the detection of malignant pulmonary nodules and masses. Acad Radiol 2014;21(1):21–29.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 147. Halavaara J, Breuer J, Ayuso C, et al. Liver tumor characterization: comparison between liver-specific gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MRI and biphasic CT—a multicenter trial. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30(3):345–354.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 148. Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF, et al. Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis—meta-analysis. Radiology 2005;237(1):123–131.
  Google Scholar
• 149. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(6):1622–1635.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 150. Lee Y, Lee SS, Kim N, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver: effect of triggering methods on regional variability and measurement repeatability of quantitative parameters. Radiology 2015;274(2):405–415.
  Google Scholar
• 151. Taouli B, Sandberg A, Stemmer A, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: comparison of navigator triggered and breathhold acquisitions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30(3):561–568.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 152. Kandpal H, Sharma R, Madhusudhan KS, Kapoor KS. Respiratory-triggered versus breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI of liver lesions: comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient values. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(4):915–922.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 153. Chen X, Qin L, Pan D, et al. Liver diffusion-weighted MR imaging: reproducibility comparison of ADC measurements obtained with multiple breath-hold, free-breathing, respiratory-triggered, and navigator-triggered techniques. Radiology 2014;271(1):113–125.
  Google Scholar
• 154. Yamada I, Aung W, Himeno Y, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H. Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1999;210(3):617–623.
  Google Scholar
• 155. Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, et al. Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging—pilot study. Radiology 2008;249(3):891–899.
  Google Scholar
• 156. Patel J, Sigmund EE, Rusinek H, Oei M, Babb JS, Taouli B. Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31(3):589–600.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 157. Dyvorne HA, Galea N, Nevers T, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver with multiple b values: effect of diffusion gradient polarity and breathing acquisition on image quality and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters—a pilot study. Radiology 2013;266(3):920–929.
  Google Scholar
• 158. Yoon JH, Lee JM, Yu MH, Kiefer B, Han JK, Choi BI. Evaluation of hepatic focal lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39(2):276–285.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 159. Kim YK, Lee MW, Lee WJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of diffusion-weighted and of gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MR imaging alone or in combination in the detection of small liver metastasis (≤ 1.5 cm in diameter). Invest Radiol 2012;47(3):159–166.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 160. Chung WS, Kim MJ, Chung YE, et al. Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for the preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34(2):345–353.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 161. Holzapfel K, Eiber MJ, Fingerle AA, Bruegel M, Rummeny EJ, Gaa J. Detection, classification, and characterization of focal liver lesions: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combination of both methods. Abdom Imaging 2012;37(1):74–82.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 162. Koh DM, Collins DJ, Wallace T, Chau I, Riddell AM. Combining diffusion-weighted MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI improves the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Radiol 2012;85(1015):980–989.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 163. Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, Daire JL, Fan B, Menu Y. Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 2003;226(1):71–78.
  Google Scholar
• 164. Koh DM, Scurr E, Collins DJ, et al. Colorectal hepatic metastases: quantitative measurements using single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2006;16(9):1898–1905.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 165. Joo I, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Jang JJ, Han JK, Choi BI. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging-an experimental study in a rabbit model. Radiology 2014;270(1):131–140.
  Google Scholar
• 166. Van Beers BE. Science to Practice: can we diagnose nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging? Radiology 2014;270(1):1–2.
  Google Scholar
• 167. Rapacchi S, Wen H, Viallon M, et al. Low b-value diffusion-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial results in humans using an optimal time-window imaging approach. Invest Radiol 2011;46(12):751–758.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 168. Delattre BM, Viallon M, Wei H, et al. In vivo cardiac diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: quantification of normal perfusion and diffusion coefficients with intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Invest Radiol 2012;47(11):662–670.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 169. Baur A, Stäbler A, Brüning R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 1998;207(2):349–356.
  Google Scholar
• 170. Herneth AM, Philipp MO, Naude J, et al. Vertebral metastases: assessment with apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology 2002;225(3):889–894.
  Google Scholar
• 171. Padhani AR, Makris A, Gall P, Collins DJ, Tunariu N, de Bono JS. Therapy monitoring of skeletal metastases with whole-body diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39(5):1049–1078.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 172. Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sano K, Morisaka H, Araki T. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of the kidney: alterations in diffusion and perfusion in patients with renal dysfunction. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31(3):414–417.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 173. Chandarana H, Lee VS, Hecht E, Taouli B, Sigmund EE. Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion weighted imaging in evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol 2011;46(5):285–291.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 174. Gaing B, Sigmund EE, Huang WC, et al. Subtype differentiation of renal tumors using voxel-based histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters. Invest Radiol 2015;50(3):144–152.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 175. Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Rusinek H, et al. Optimization of b-value sampling for diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney. Magn Reson Med 2012;67(1):89–97.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 176. Lemke A, Stieltjes B, Schad LR, Laun FB. Toward an optimal distribution of b values for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29(6):766–776.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 177. Leporq B, Saint-Jalmes H, Rabrait C, et al. Optimization of intra-voxel incoherent motion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for fast liver examination. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41(5):1209–1217.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 178. Cohen AD, Schieke MC, Hohenwalter MD, Schmainda KM. The effect of low b-values on the intravoxel incoherent motion derived pseudodiffusion parameter in liver. Magn Reson Med 2014;73(1):306–311.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 179. Jambor I, Merisaari H, Aronen HJ, et al. Optimization of b-value distribution for biexponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39(5):1213–1222.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 180. Cho GY, Moy L, Zhang JL, et al. Comparison of fitting methods and b-value sampling strategies for intravoxel incoherent motion in breast cancer. Magn Reson Med 2014 Oct 9. [Epub ahead of print]
  Google Scholar
• 181. Iima M, Yamamoto A, Le Bihan D, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of head and neck lesions from non-Gaussian diffusion MRI signal patterns [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2015: 0687.
  Google Scholar