Prediction of Femoral Neck Strength in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus with Trabecular Bone Analysis and Tomosynthesis Images

References

• 1. Mosekilde L. The effect of modelling and remodelling on human vertebral body architecture. Technol Health Care 1998;6(5-6):287–297.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 2. Kanis JA. Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 2002;359(9321):1929–1936.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 3. Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, et al. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 2004;34(1):195–202.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 4. Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC, et al. Association of BMD and FRAX score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2011;305(21):2184–2192.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 5. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20(7):1185–1194.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 6. Geijer M, Börjesson AM, Göthlin JH. Clinical utility of tomosynthesis in suspected scaphoid fracture. A pilot study. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40(7):863–867.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 7. Hayashi D, Xu L, Roemer FW, et al. Detection of osteophytes and subchondral cysts in the knee with use of tomosynthesis. Radiology 2012;263(1):206–215.
  Google Scholar
• 8. Gazaille RE 3rd, Flynn MJ, Page W 3rd, Finley S, van Holsbeeck M. Technical innovation: digital tomosynthesis of the hip following intra-articular administration of contrast. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40(11):1467–1471.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 9. Canella C, Philippe P, Pansini V, Salleron J, Flipo RM, Cotten A. Use of tomosynthesis for erosion evaluation in rheumatoid arthritic hands and wrists. Radiology 2011;258(1):199–205.
  Google Scholar
• 10. Aoki T, Fujii M, Yamashita Y, et al. Tomosynthesis of the wrist and hand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with radiography and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202(2):386–390.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 11. Gomi T, Hirano H. Clinical potential of digital linear tomosynthesis imaging of total joint arthroplasty. J Digit Imaging 2008;21(3):312–322.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 12. Ohnishi I, Oikawa K, Tsuji K, Ichikawa T, Kurokawa T. A femoral neck fracture model in rabbits. J Biomech 2003;36(3):431–442.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 13. Bessho M, Ohnishi I, Matsuyama J, Matsumoto T, Imai K, Nakamura K. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. J Biomech 2007;40(8):1745–1753.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 14. Wakao N, Harada A, Matsui Y, et al. The effect of impact direction on the fracture load of osteoporotic proximal femurs. Med Eng Phys 2009;31(9):1134–1139.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 15. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8(9):1137–1148.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 16. Haralick RM. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 1979;67(5):786–804.
  Google Scholar
• 17. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from grey-level hoistgrams. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1979;9(1):62–66.
  Google Scholar
• 18. Hilditch CJ. Linear skeletons from square cupboards. In: Meltzer B, Michie D, eds. Machine intelligence. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 1969; 403–420.
  Google Scholar
• 19. Keyak JH, Skinner HB, Fleming JA. Effect of force direction on femoral fracture load for two types of loading conditions. J Orthop Res 2001;19(4):539–544.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 20. Bessho M, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, et al. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. Bone 2009;45(2):226–231.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 21. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Odén A, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2004;15(1):38–42.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 22. Gulcelik NE, Bayraktar M, Caglar O, Alpaslan M, Karakaya J. Mortality after hip fracture in diabetic patients. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2011;119(7):414–418.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 23. Norris R, Parker M. Diabetes mellitus and hip fracture: a study of 5966 cases. Injury 2011;42(11):1313–1316.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 24. Rudman KE, Aspden RM, Meakin JR. Compression or tension? The stress distribution in the proximal femur. Biomed Eng Online 2006;5:12.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 25. Huber MB, Carballido-Gamio J, Fritscher K, et al. Development and testing of texture discriminators for the analysis of trabecular bone in proximal femur radiographs. Med Phys 2009;36(11):5089–5098.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 26. Patel SH, Murphy KP. Fractures of the proximal femur: correlates of radiological evidence of osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35(4):202–211.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 27. Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS. Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52(3):457–467.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 28. Kazakia GJ, Majumdar S. New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2006;7(1-2):67–74.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 29. Chang G, Honig S, Brown R, et al. Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects. Radiology 2014;272(2):464–474.
  Google Scholar
• 30. El Maghraoui A, Do Santos Zounon AA, Jroundi I, et al. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 2005;16(12):1742–1748.
  Medline Google Scholar