Tomosynthesis-based trabecular bone analysis is technically feasible and, in combination with bone mineral density measurements, may potentially be used to predict bone strength in patients with diabetes mellitus.
To determine trabecular bone analysis values by using tomosynthesis images in determining femoral neck strength in patients with diabetes mellitus and compare its parameters between vertebral compression fracture and nonfracture groups.
Materials and Methods
The institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Forty-nine patients with diabetes mellitus were included. Within 1 week, patients underwent dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), tomosynthesis, and computed tomography (CT) covering the T10 vertebral body to the hip joints. The trabecular patterns of tomosynthesis images were extracted, and the total strut length, bone volume per tissue volume, and five textural features (homogeneity, entropy, correlation, contrast, and variance) were obtained as the indices of tomosynthesis images. Failure load of the femoral neck, which was determined with the CT-based finite-element method (FEM), was used as the reference standard for bone strength. A forward stepwise multiple regression analysis for evaluating the availability of the tomosynthesis image indices was performed. The bone mineral density (BMD) at DXA and tomosynthesis image indices were compared between the vertebral compression fracture (n = 16) and nonfracture groups (n = 33) according to Genant semiquantitative morphometry methods by using one-way analysis of variance.
The combination of BMD with the bone volume per tissue volume at the principal tensile group and the correlation at the principal compressive group showed the highest correlation to the failure load at CT FEM, and the correlation (r2 = 0.83) was higher than that between the failure load and the BMD alone (r2 = 0.76; P < .001). The averages of the bone volume per tissue volume and entropy at the principal tensile group in the vertebral compression fracture group were lower than those in the nonfracture group (P = .017 and P = .029, respectively), but there was no difference in BMD.
Tomosynthesis-based trabecular bone analysis is technically feasible and, in combination with BMD measurements, can potentially be used to determine bone strength in patients with diabetes mellitus.
© RSNA, 2016
- 1. . The effect of modelling and remodelling on human vertebral body architecture. Technol Health Care 1998;6(5-6):287–297. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 2. . Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 2002;359(9321):1929–1936. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 3. . Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 2004;34(1):195–202. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 4. . Association of BMD and FRAX score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2011;305(21):2184–2192. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 5. . Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20(7):1185–1194. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 6. . Clinical utility of tomosynthesis in suspected scaphoid fracture. A pilot study. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40(7):863–867. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 7. . Detection of osteophytes and subchondral cysts in the knee with use of tomosynthesis. Radiology 2012;263(1):206–215. Link, Google Scholar
- 8. . Technical innovation: digital tomosynthesis of the hip following intra-articular administration of contrast. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40(11):1467–1471. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 9. . Use of tomosynthesis for erosion evaluation in rheumatoid arthritic hands and wrists. Radiology 2011;258(1):199–205. Link, Google Scholar
- 10. . Tomosynthesis of the wrist and hand in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with radiography and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202(2):386–390. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 11. . Clinical potential of digital linear tomosynthesis imaging of total joint arthroplasty. J Digit Imaging 2008;21(3):312–322. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 12. . A femoral neck fracture model in rabbits. J Biomech 2003;36(3):431–442. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 13. . Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. J Biomech 2007;40(8):1745–1753. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 14. . The effect of impact direction on the fracture load of osteoporotic proximal femurs. Med Eng Phys 2009;31(9):1134–1139. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 15. . Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8(9):1137–1148. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 16. . Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE 1979;67(5):786–804. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 17. . A threshold selection method from grey-level hoistgrams. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1979;9(1):62–66. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 18. . Linear skeletons from square cupboards. In: Meltzer B, Michie D, eds. Machine intelligence. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 1969; 403–420. Google Scholar
- 19. . Effect of force direction on femoral fracture load for two types of loading conditions. J Orthop Res 2001;19(4):539–544. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 20. . Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. Bone 2009;45(2):226–231. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 21. . Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2004;15(1):38–42. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 22. . Mortality after hip fracture in diabetic patients. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2011;119(7):414–418. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 23. . Diabetes mellitus and hip fracture: a study of 5966 cases. Injury 2011;42(11):1313–1316. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 24. . Compression or tension? The stress distribution in the proximal femur. Biomed Eng Online 2006;5:12. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 25. . Development and testing of texture discriminators for the analysis of trabecular bone in proximal femur radiographs. Med Phys 2009;36(11):5089–5098. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 26. . Fractures of the proximal femur: correlates of radiological evidence of osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35(4):202–211. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 27. . Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52(3):457–467. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 28. . New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2006;7(1-2):67–74. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 29. . Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects. Radiology 2014;272(2):464–474. Link, Google Scholar
- 30. . Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 2005;16(12):1742–1748. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
Article HistoryReceived July 28, 2015; revision requested September 15; revision received March 4, 2016; accepted March 22; final version accepted April 8.
Published online: June 16 2016
Published in print: Dec 2016