Ischemia Induces Quiescence and Autophagy Dependence in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Our findings, in combination with the nutrient deprivation and oxidative stress associated with the post-transarterial embolization (TAE)/transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) microenvironment, suggest that autophagy may represent an optimal and even necessary target for adjunct therapy in TAE/TACE.

Purpose

To characterize hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells surviving ischemia with respect to cell cycle kinetics, chemosensitivity, and molecular dependencies that may be exploited to potentiate treatment with transarterial embolization (TAE).

Materials and Methods

Animal studies were performed according to institutionally approved protocols. The growth kinetics of HCC cells were studied in standard and ischemic conditions. Viability and cell cycle kinetics were measured by using flow cytometry. Cytotoxicity profiling was performed by using a colorimetric cell proliferation assay. Analyses of the Cancer Genome Atlas HCC RNA-sequencing data were performed by using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. Activation of molecular mediators of autophagy was measured with Western blot analysis and fluorescence microscopy. In vivo TAE was performed in a rat model of HCC with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) the autophagy inhibitor Lys05. Statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad software.

Results

HCC cells survived ischemia with an up to 43% increase in the fraction of quiescent cells as compared with cells grown in standard conditions (P < .004). Neither doxorubicin nor mitomycin C potentiated the cytotoxic effects of ischemia. Gene-set analysis revealed an increase in mRNA expression of the mediators of autophagy (eg, CDKN2A, PPP2R2C, and TRAF2) in HCC as compared with normal liver. Cells surviving ischemia were autophagy dependent. Combination therapy coupling autophagy inhibition and TAE in a rat model of HCC resulted in a 21% increase in tumor necrosis compared with TAE alone (P = .044).

Conclusion

Ischemia induces quiescence in surviving HCC cells, resulting in a dependence on autophagy, providing a potential therapeutic target for combination therapy with TAE.

© RSNA, 2017

Online supplemental material is available for this article.

References

  • 1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65(2):87–108.
  • 2. Kanematsu T, Furui J, Yanaga K, Okudaira S, Shimada M, Shirabe K. A 16-year experience in performing hepatic resection in 303 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: 1985-2000. Surgery 2002;131(1 Suppl):S153–S158.
  • 3. Raoul JL, Sangro B, Forner A, et al. Evolving strategies for the management of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: available evidence and expert opinion on the use of transarterial chemoembolization. Cancer Treat Rev 2011;37(3):212–220.
  • 4. Farinati F, De Maria N, Marafin C, et al. Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: survival, prognostic factors, and unexpected side effects after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41(12):2332–2339.
  • 5. Jin YJ, Chung YH, Kim JA, et al. Predisposing factors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following complete remission in response to transarterial chemoembolization. Dig Dis Sci 2013;58(6):1758–1765.
  • 6. Takayasu K, Arii S, Ikai I, et al. Prospective cohort study of transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in 8510 patients. Gastroenterology 2006;131(2):461–469.
  • 7. Kawai S, Okamura J, Ogawa M, et al. Prospective and randomized clinical trial for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization with and without adriamycin (first cooperative study). The Cooperative Study Group for Liver Cancer Treatment of Japan. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1992;31(Suppl):S1–S6.
  • 8. Llovet JM, Real MI, Montaña X, et al. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359(9319):1734–1739.
  • 9. Chang JM, Tzeng WS, Pan HB, Yang CF, Lai KH. Transcatheter arterial embolization with or without cisplatin treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled study. Cancer 1994;74(9):2449–2453.
  • 10. Marelli L, Stigliano R, Triantos C, et al. Transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: which technique is more effective? a systematic review of cohort and randomized studies. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007;30(1):6–25.
  • 11. Brown KT, Do RK, Gonen M, et al. Randomized trial of hepatic artery embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using doxorubicin-eluting microspheres compared with embolization with microspheres alone. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(17):2046–2053.
  • 12. Malagari K, Pomoni M, Kelekis A, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads and bland embolization with BeadBlock for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010;33(3):541–551.
  • 13. Meyer T, Kirkwood A, Roughton M, et al. A randomised phase II/III trial of 3-weekly cisplatin-based sequential transarterial chemoembolisation vs embolisation alone for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2013;108(6):1252–1259.
  • 14. El-Gazzaz G, Sourianarayanane A, Menon KV, et al. Radiologic-histological correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated via pre-liver transplant locoregional therapies. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2013;12(1):34–41.
  • 15. Riaz A, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with internal radiation using yttrium-90 microspheres. Hepatology 2009;49(4):1185–1193.
  • 16. Higuchi T, Kikuchi M, Okazaki M. Hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter hepatic arterial embolization. A histopathologic study of 84 resected cases. Cancer 1994;73(9):2259–2267.
  • 17. Chung JW. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45(Suppl 3):1236–1241.
  • 18. Tezuka M, Hayashi K, Kubota K, et al. Growth rate of locally recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: comparing the growth rate of locally recurrent tumor with that of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 2007;52(3):783–788.
  • 19. Forner A, Ayuso C, Varela M, et al. Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evaluation criteria in solid tumors reliable? Cancer 2009;115(3):616–623.
  • 20. Liu L, Ren ZG, Shen Y, et al. Influence of hepatic artery occlusion on tumor growth and metastatic potential in a human orthotopic hepatoma nude mouse model: relevance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Sci 2010;101(1):120–128.
  • 21. Jackson WT, Giddings TH Jr, Taylor MP, et al. Subversion of cellular autophagosomal machinery by RNA viruses. PLoS Biol 2005;3(5):e156.
  • 22. Lebovitz CB, Robertson AG, Goya R, et al. Cross-cancer profiling of molecular alterations within the human autophagy interaction network. Autophagy 2015;11(9):1668–1687.
  • 23. Dagda RK, Zhu J, Kulich SM, Chu CT. Mitochondrially localized ERK2 regulates mitophagy and autophagic cell stress: implications for Parkinson’s disease. Autophagy 2008;4(6):770–782.
  • 24. Ha WS, Kim CK, Song SH, Kang CB. Study on mechanism of multistep hepatotumorigenesis in rat: development of hepatotumorigenesis. J Vet Sci 2001;2(1):53–58.
  • 25. McAfee Q, Zhang Z, Samanta A, et al. Autophagy inhibitor Lys05 has single-agent antitumor activity and reproduces the phenotype of a genetic autophagy deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109(21):8253–8258.
  • 26. Park JG, Lee SK, Hong IG, et al. MDR1 gene expression: its effect on drug resistance to doxorubicin in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86(9):700–705.
  • 27. Kruskal JB, Hlatky L, Hahnfeldt P, Teramoto K, Stokes KR, Clouse ME. In vivo and in vitro analysis of the effectiveness of doxorubicin combined with temporary arterial occlusion in liver tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1993;4(6):741–747.
  • 28. Sakulterdkiat T, Srisomsap C, Udomsangpetch R, Svasti J, Lirdprapamongkol K. Curcumin resistance induced by hypoxia in HepG2 cells is mediated by multidrug-resistance-associated proteins. Anticancer Res 2012;32(12):5337–5342.
  • 29. Yeo W, Mok TS, Zee B, et al. A randomized phase III study of doxorubicin versus cisplatin/interferon alpha-2b/doxorubicin/fluorouracil (PIAF) combination chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97(20):1532–1538.
  • 30. Valcourt JR, Lemons JM, Haley EM, Kojima M, Demuren OO, Coller HA. Staying alive: metabolic adaptations to quiescence. Cell Cycle 2012;11(9):1680–1696.
  • 31. Xi SY, Lu JB, Chen JW, et al. The “stone-like” pattern of LC3A expression and its clinicopathologic significance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013;431(4):760–766.
  • 32. Du H, Yang W, Chen L, et al. Emerging role of autophagy during ischemia-hypoxia and reperfusion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol 2012;40(6):2049–2057.
  • 33. Czaja MJ, Ding WX, Donohue TM Jr, et al. Functions of autophagy in normal and diseased liver. Autophagy 2013;9(8):1131–1158.
  • 34. Cheong H, Lindsten T, Wu J, Lu C, Thompson CB. Ammonia-induced autophagy is independent of ULK1/ULK2 kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(27):11121–11126. [Published correction appears in Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(43):17856.]
  • 35. Liu H, Dong H, Robertson K, Liu C. DNA methylation suppresses expression of the urea cycle enzyme carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1) in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Pathol 2011;178(2):652–661.
  • 36. Gao L, Song JR, Zhang JW, et al. Chloroquine promotes the anticancer effect of TACE in a rabbit VX2 liver tumor model. Int J Biol Sci 2013;9(4):322–330.
  • 37. Pellegrini P, Strambi A, Zipoli C, et al. Acidic extracellular pH neutralizes the autophagy-inhibiting activity of chloroquine: implications for cancer therapies. Autophagy 2014;10(4):562–571.
  • 38. University of Pennsylvania. Phase 1-2 Trial HCQ Plus TACE in Unresectable HCC. clinicaltrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02013778?term=TACE+hydroxychloroquine&rank=1. Published 2013. Accessed October 14, 2015.

Article History

Received April 5, 2016; revision requested June 15; revision received October 12; accepted November 21; final version accepted December 18.
Published online: Mar 02 2017
Published in print: June 2017