Strategies for Radiology to Thrive in the Value Era

References

• 1. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2013. Google Scholar
• 2. Liver Reporting & Data System. American College of Radiology. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/LI-RADS. Accessed April 14, 2018. Google Scholar
• 3. Lung-RADS™ Version 1.0 Assessment Categories. American College of Radiology. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/Lung-RADS/LungRADS_ AssessmentCategories.pdf?la=en. Published April 28, 2014. Accessed April 14, 2018. Google Scholar
• 4. PI-RADS™ Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/Pi-RADS/PIRADS-V2.pdf?la=en. Published 2015. Accessed April 14, 2018. Google Scholar
• 5. Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Casey LS. Health care in the 2016 Election - a view through voters’ polarized lenses. N Engl J Med 2016;375(17):e37. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 6. The Burden of Medical Debt: Results from the Kaiser Family Foundation/New York Times Medical Bills Survey. Kaiser Family Foundation. https://www.kff.org/ report-section/the-burden-of-medical-debt-section-1-who-has-medical-bill- problems-and-what-are-the-contributing-factors/. Published January 5, 2016. Accessed April 14, 2018. Google Scholar
• 7. Larson DB, Durand DJ, Siegal DS. Understanding and applying the concept of value creation in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14(4):549–557. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 8. Senge PM. The Fifth Discipline: the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY: Doubleday, 1990. Google Scholar
• 9. Ellenbogen PH. Imaging 3.0: what is it? J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10(4):229. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 10. Enzmann DR. Radiology’s value chain. Radiology 2012;263(1):243–252. Link, Google Scholar
• 11. Heller RE 3rd The total value equation: a suggested framework for understanding value creation in diagnostic radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11(1):24–29. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 12. Patel S. Value management program: performance, quantification, and presentation of imaging value-added actions. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12(3):239–248. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 13. Boland GW, Duszak R Jr. A roadmap for value-based payments. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13(2):170–172. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 14. Sadigh G, Hertweck T, Kao C et al. Traditional text-only versus multimedia- enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians’ perceptions of value. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12(5):519–524. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 15. Kang SK, Scherer LD, Megibow AJ et al. A randomized study of patient risk perception for incidental renal findings on diagnostic imaging tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210(2):369–375. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 16. Mohan SK, Hudgins PA, Patel MR, Stapleton J, Duszak R Jr, Aiken AH. Making time for patients: positive impact of direct patient reporting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210(1):W12–W17. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 17. Levin DC. The 2014 RSNA Annual Oration in diagnostic radiology: transitioning from volume-based to value-based practice-a meaningful goal for all radiologists or a meaningless platitude? Radiology 2015;275(2):314–320. Link, Google Scholar
• 18. Trakhtenbroit M, Abdollahian D, Horton KM, Johnson PT. Choosing wisely and imaging 3.0 professional development: radiology resident consultant service. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13(6):730–732. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 19. Weldon CB, Friedewald SM, Kulkarni SA et al. Radiology as the point of cancer patient and care team engagement: applying the 4R model at a patient’s breast cancer care initiation. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13(12 Pt B):1579–1589. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 20. Glazer GM, Ruiz-Wibbelsmann JA. The invisible radiologist. Radiology 2011; 258(1):18–22. Link, Google Scholar
• 21. Larson DB, Langlotz CP. The role of radiology in the diagnostic process: information, communication, and teamwork. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;209(5):992–1000. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 22. Boland GW, Enzmann DR, Duszak R Jr. Actionable reporting. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11(9):844–845. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 23. Gawande A. Cowboys and pit crews. The New Yorker News Desk. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/cowboys-and-pit-crews. Published May 26, 2011. Accessed January 20, 2018. Google Scholar
• 24. McChrystal S, Collins T, Silverman D, Fussell C. Team of teams: New rules of engagement for a complex world. New York, NY: Penguin Random House, 2015. Google Scholar
• 25. Garvin DA. Building a learning organization. Harv Bus Rev 1993;71(4):78–91. Medline, Google Scholar
• 26. Larson DB, Donnelly LF, Podberesky DJ, Merrow AC, Sharpe RE Jr, Kruskal JB. Peer feedback, learning, and improvement: answering the call of the institute of medicine report on diagnostic error. Radiology 2017;283(1):231–241. Link, Google Scholar
• 27. Deblois S, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Toporowicz K, Chen Z, Lepanto L. Interventions to reduce the overuse of imaging for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. J Hosp Med 2018;13(1):52–61. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 28. Larson DB, Froehle CM, Johnson ND, Towbin AJ. Communication in diagnostic radiology: meeting the challenges of complexity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203(5):957–964. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 29. Wynia MK, Kurlander JE. Physician ethics and participation in quality improvement: Reviewing a professional obligation. In: Jennings B, Baily MA, Bottrell M, Lynn J, eds. Health care quality improvement: Ethical and regulatory Issues. Garrison, NY: The Hastings Center, 2007. Google Scholar
• 30. Wachter RM. The digital doctor: hope, hype, and harm at the dawn of medicine’s computer age. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 2015. Google Scholar