Multi–Detector Row Spiral CT Pulmonary Angiography: Comparison with Single–Detector Row Spiral CT

PURPOSE: To compare vascular conspicuity and ability to connect pulmonary arterial branches on pulmonary angiograms obtained with helical multi–detector row computed tomography (CT) with those on pulmonary angiograms obtained with helical single–detector row CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 93 consecutive patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism, 48 underwent scanning with multi–detector row CT and 45 with single–detector row CT; scans were obtained in 9 seconds and 28 seconds with 2.5-mm and 3.0-mm collimation, respectively. The lungs were divided into three zones: central, middle, and peripheral. Two independent observers used five-point grading scales.

RESULTS: Conspicuity of pulmonary arteries in the central zone was ranked equal (median of 5), but in the middle and peripheral zones it was significantly higher at multi–detector row CT than at single–detector row CT (median 5 vs 4 and 4 vs 3, P < .001, respectively). In addition, multi–detector row CT improved the ability to connect peripheral arteries with their more centrally located pulmonary artery of origin in the peripheral but not the middle zone on transverse images and in both zones on multiplanar images. Viewing with a modified window setting (width, 1,000 HU; level, −100 HU) significantly increased pulmonary arterial conspicuity. Contrast material column in the pulmonary arteries was significantly more homogeneous at multi–detector row CT.

CONCLUSION: Use of multi–detector row CT significantly improves pulmonary arterial visualization in the middle and peripheral lung zones.

References

  • 1 Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL, et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology 1997; 205:447-452. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2 van Rossum AB, Pattynama PM, Ton ER, et al. Pulmonary embolism: validation of spiral CT angiography in 149 patients. Radiology 1996; 201:467-470. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology 1996; 200:699-706. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al. Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1041-1047. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kim KI, Muller NL, Mayo JR. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. Radiology 1999; 210:693-697. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Baghaie F, Fribourg M, Artaud D, Duhamel A. Clinical value of thin collimation in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:407-411. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Woodard PK. Pulmonary arteries must be seen before they can be assessed. Radiology 1997; 204:11-12. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Artaud D, Deschildre F, Duhamel A. Peripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol. Radiology 1997; 204:157-163. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Foley DW, Mallissee TA, Hohenwalter MD, Wilson CR, Quiroz FA, Taylor AJ. Multiphase hepatic CT with a multirow detector CT scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:679-685. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brink JA, Woodard PK, Horesh L, et al. Depiction of pulmonary emboli with spiral CT: optimization of display window settings in a porcine model. Radiology 1997; 204:703-708. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics Norwalk, Conn: Appleton & Lange, 1994; 139. Google Scholar
  • 12 Quinn MF, Lundell CJ, Klotz TA, et al. Reliability of selective pulmonary arteriography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149:469-471. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, Liu Y, McAuliffe TL, O’Brien DJ. Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative CT pulmonary angiogram—prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology 2000; 215:535-542. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Garg K, Sieler H, Welsh CH, Johnston RJ, Russ PD. Clinical validity of helical CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism: implications for patient treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:1627-1631. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Howarth N, Lucidarme O, et al. Contrast-enhanced helical CT for pulmonary embolism detection: inter- and intraobserver agreement among radiologists with variable experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:107-112. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning—correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology 1998; 208:201- 208. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ferretti GR, Bosson JL, Buffaz PD, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: role of helical CT in 164 patients with intermediate probability at ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and normal results at duplex US of the legs. Radiology 1997; 205:453- 458. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J. Spiral CT angiography of the pulmonary circulation. Radiology 1999; 212:615-636. LinkGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Dec 2001