Covered, Retrievable, Expandable Urethral Nitinol Stent: Feasibility Study in Dogs

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of using a retrievable urethral stent and to evaluate whether granulation tissue resolves after stent removal in a canine urethra.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polyurethane-covered retrievable 0.10-mm-thick (n = 11) or 0.15-mm-thick (n = 10) nitinol wire stents were placed in the urethras of 20 dogs. In one dog, a second stent was placed in the urethra because of complete migration of the first stent into the urinary bladder. The stents were removed with retrieval hook wires 4 weeks (n = 10) and 8 weeks (n = 10) after placement. Fourteen dogs were sacrificed just after stent removal, and the other six dogs were sacrificed 2 weeks after stent removal. Information concerning procedure success, stent migration, and tissue response was obtained.

RESULTS: Stent placement was technically successful in all dogs. Follow-up urethrograms showed partial (n = 4) or complete (n = 1) stent migration. Stent removal failed in two dogs due to partial or complete migration. Granulation tissue was observed at both ends of the stent in 17 dogs. Urethrograms and urethral specimens obtained 2 weeks after stent removal showed diminished granulation tissue and decreased thickness of the papillary projections of the epithelium compared with results obtained immediately after stent removal.

CONCLUSION: Although some design modifications are necessary to reduce current complications, the polyurethane-covered retrievable nitinol stent seems feasible for use in the urethra. Stent-induced granulation tissue formation improved after stent removal.

© RSNA, 2002

References

  • 1 Milroy EJ, Chapple CR, Cooper JE, et al. A new treatment for urethral strictures. Lancet 1988; 1:1424-1427. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ashken MH, Coulange C, Milroy EJ, Sarramon JP. European experience with the urethral Wallstent for urethral strictures. Eur Urol 1991; 19:181-185. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Morgia G, Saita A, Morana F, et al. Endoprosthesis implantation in the treatment of recurrent urethral stricture: a multicenter study. J Endourol 1999; 13:587-590. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Yachia D, Beyar M. Temporarily implanted urethral coil stent for the treatment of recurrent urethral strictures: a preliminary report. J Urol 1991; 146:1001-1004. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Badlani GH, Press SM, DeFalco A, Oesterling JE, Smith AD. UroLume endourethral prosthesis for the treatment of urethral stricture disease: long-term results of the North American Multicenter UroLume Trial. Urology 1995; 45:846-856. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gujral RB, Roy S, Baijal SS, et al. Treatment of recurrent posterior and bulbar urethral strictures with expandable metallic stents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995; 6:427-432. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Baert L, Verhamme L, Van Poppel H, Vandeursen H, Baert J. Long-term consequences of urethral stents. J Urol 1993; 150:853-855. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Milroy E, Allen A. Long-term results of UroLume urethral stent for recurrent urethral strictures. J Urol 1996; 155:904-908. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Corujo M, Badlani GH. Uncommon complications of permanent stents. J Endourol 1998; 12:385-388. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sneller ZW, Bosch RJ. Restenosis of the urethra despite indwelling Wallstent. J Urol 1992; 148:145-147. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Acunas B, Rozanes I, Akpinar S, Tunaci A, Tunaci M, Acunas G. Palliation of malignant esophageal strictures with self-expanding nitinol stents: drawbacks and complications. Radiology 1996; 199:648-652. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sawada S, Tanigawa N, Kobayashi M, Furui S, Ohta Y. Malignant tracheobronchial obstructive lesions: treatment with Gianturco expandable metallic stents. Radiology 1993; 188:205-208. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Song HY, Park SI, Jung HY, et al. Benign and malignant esophageal strictures: treatment with a polyurethane-covered retrievable expandable metallic stent. Radiology 1997; 203:747-752. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Song HY, Shim TS, Kang SG, et al. Tracheobronchial strictures: treatment with a polyurethane-covered retrievable expandable nitinol stent-Initial experience. Radiology 1999; 213:905-912. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mori K, Okamoto S, Akimoto M. A new self-expansive intraurethral stent using shape memory alloy: a preliminary report of its availability. Urol 1995; 45:165-170. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Latal D, Mraz J, Zerhau P, Susani M, Marberger M. Nitinol urethral stents: long-term results in dogs. Urol Res 1994; 22:295-300. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nissenkorn I. A simple nonmetal stent for treatment of urethral strictures: a preliminary report. J Urol 1995; 154:1117-1118. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yachia D, Beyar M. New, self-expanding, self-retaining temporary coil stent for recurrent urethral strictures near the external sphincter. Br J Urol 1993; 71:317-321. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ricciotti G, Bozzo W, Perachino M, Pezzica C, Puppo P. Heat-expansible permanent intraurethral stents for benign prostatic hyperplasia and urethral strictures. J Endourol 1995; 9:417-422. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Isotalo T, Tammela TL, Talja M, Valimaa T, Tormala P. A bioabsorbable self-expandable self-reinformced poly-L-lactic acid urethral stent for recurrent urethral strictures: a preliminary report. J Urol 1998; 160:2033-2036. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bosnjakovic P, Ilic M, Ivkovic T, et al. Flexible tantalum stents: effects in the stenotic canine urethra. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1994; 17:280-284. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ponce Campuzano A, Gonzalez Satue C, Rodriguez Tolra J, Trilla Herrera E, Serralach i Mila N. Treatment of urethral stenosis with thermo-expandable prosthesis “Memotherm”: our experience. Arch Esp Urol 2000; 53:253-258. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Dobben RL, Wright KC, Dolenz K, Wallace S, Gianturco C. Prostatic urethra dilatation with the Gianturco self-expanding metallic stent: a feasibility study in cadaver specimens and dogs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156:757-761. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Krah H, Djamilian M, Seabert J, Allhoff EP, Stief C, Jonas U. Significant obliteration of the urethral lumen after Wallstent implantation. J Urol 1992; 148:1901-1902. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kemppainen E, Talja M, Riihela M, Pohjonen T, Tormala P, Alfthan O. A bioresorbable urethral stent: an experimental study. Urol Res 1993; 21:235-238. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bailey DM, Foley SJ, McFarlane JP, O’Neil G, Parkinson MC, Shah PJ. Histological changes associated with long-term urethral stents. Br J Urol 1998; 81:745-749. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Apr 2002