Small Pulmonary Nodules: Detection at Chest CT and Outcome

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of pulmonary nodules less than 1 cm in diameter detected at chest computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports of chest CT performed during 6 months were reviewed to find patients with pulmonary nodules smaller than 1 cm in long axis for which repeat CT was recommended. Records were studied to determine whether follow-up had been performed, the initial nodules had changed in size, or nodules had been resected.

RESULTS: A total of 3,446 chest CT examinations were performed, with 334 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Three patients underwent nodule resection and had pathologic examination results positive for cancer; 185 underwent follow-up, of whom 13 had results excluded as indeterminate. In the remaining 172 patients, 88 had incomplete characterization because of follow-up of less than 2 years, which left 84 with nodule characterization at follow-up. When these 84 patients were combined with the three patients with nodule resection, the number yielded was 87 patients. Seventy-seven of 87 had benign nodules because of resolution or 2-year stability, and 10 of 87 had malignant nodules because of growth or positive histologic examination results. Nine of 10 with malignant nodules had a known primary neoplasm.

CONCLUSION: CT commonly helped identify small nodules. Increase in size occurred infrequently and almost exclusively in patients with a known malignancy.

© RSNA, 2003

References

  • 1 Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Does 2-year stability imply that pulmonary nodules are benign? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:325-328.
  • 2 Costello P, Anderson W, Blume D. Pulmonary nodule: evaluation with spiral volumetric CT. Radiology 1991; 179:875-876.
  • 3 Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Giraud F, Marquette CH. Pulmonary nodules: detection with thick-section spiral CT versus conventional CT. Radiology 1993; 187:513-520.
  • 4 Keogan MT, Tung KT, Kaplan DK, et al. The significance of pulmonary nodules detected on CT staging for lung cancer. Clin Radiol 1993; 48:94-96.
  • 5 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354:99-105.
  • 6 Hazelrigg SR, Boley TM, Weber D, et al. Incidence of lung nodules found in patients undergoing lung volume reduction. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:303-306.
  • 7 Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, et al. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: prospective findings. Radiology 1996; 201:447-455.
  • 8 Furuya K, Murayama S, Soeda H, et al. New classification of small pulmonary nodules by margin characteristics on high-resolution CT. Acta Radiol 1999; 40:496-504.
  • 9 Munden R, Pugatch R, Liptay M, Sugarbaker D, Le L. Small pulmonary lesions detected at CT: clinical importance. Radiology 1997; 202:105-110.
  • 10 Chalmers N, Best JJK. The significance of pulmonary nodules detected by CT but not by chest radiography in tumour staging. Clin Radiol 1991; 44:410-412.
  • 11 Ginsberg MS, Griff SK, Go D, et al. Pulmonary nodules resected at video-assisted thorascopic surgery: etiology in 426 patients. Radiology 1999; 213:277-282.
  • 12 Yankelevitz DF, Gupta R, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT—preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 212:561-566.

Article History

Published in print: Feb 2003