Is It Necessary to Study Accessory Arteries When Screening the Renal Arteries for Renovascular Hypertension?

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of isolated hemodynamically significant stenoses of accessory renal arteries when the main renal arteries are patent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 68 adults (24 men, mean age, 67 years ± 10; 44 women, mean age, 67 years ± 12), angiograms that fulfilled the following criteria were studied: (a) technically adequate renal angiograms obtained to evaluate suspected renovascular hypertension and (b) angiographically documented hemodynamically significant stenosis of any renal artery. The percentage of kidneys and the percentage of patients with hemodynamically significant isolated stenoses of accessory renal arteries were calculated.

RESULTS: Eighty-seven kidneys in 68 patients had hemodynamically significant renal artery stenoses. Fifteen kidneys had 16 accessory renal arteries. Four accessory arteries in three patients had hemodynamically significant stenoses. Only one of 68 patients (1.5%) had an accessory artery stenosis unaccompanied by a main renal artery stenosis in either kidney; this patient had bilateral hemodynamically significant accessory artery stenoses. Two patients had coexistent hemodynamically significant stenoses of accessory and main renal arteries.

CONCLUSION: The prevalence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis isolated to an accessory renal artery was 1.5% in our study. Thus, failure to detect accessory renal arteries should not unduly affect the utility of a noninvasive test for detecting renovascular hypertension.

© RSNA, 2003

References

  • 1 Foster JH, Dean RH, Pinkerton JA, Rhamy RK. Ten years experience with the surgical management of renovascular hypertension. Ann Surg 1973; 177:755-766. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Xue F, Bettmann MA, Langdon DR, Wivell WA. Outcome and cost comparison of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty, renal arterial stent placement, and renal arterial bypass grafting. Radiology 1999; 212:378-384. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Geyer JR, Poutasse EF. Incidence of multiple renal arteries on aortography. JAMA 1962; 182:120-125. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Halpern EJ, Nazarian LN, Wechsler RJ, et al. US, CT, and MR evaluation of accessory renal arteries and proximal renal arterial branches. Acad Radiol 1999; 6:299-304. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Berland LL, Koslin DB, Routh WD, Keller FS. Renal artery stenosis: prospective evaluation of diagnosis with color duplex US compared with angiography. Radiology 1990; 174:421-423. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Desberg AL, Paushter DM, Lammert GK, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with color Doppler flow imaging. Radiology 1990; 177:749-753. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ram CVS. Renovascular hypertension. Cardiol Clin 1988; 6:483-508. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hansen KJ, Tribble RW, Reavis SW, et al. Renal duplex sonography: evaluation of clinical utility. J Vasc Surg 1990; 12:227-236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hoffmann U, Edwards JM, Carter S, et al. Role of duplex scanning for the detection of atherosclerotic renal artery disease. Kidney Int 1991; 39:1232-1239. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fommei E, Ghione S, Hilson AJW, et al. Captopril radionuclide test in renovascular hypertension: a European multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med 1993; 20:617-623. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mann SJ, Pickering TG, Sos TA, et al. Captopril renography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: accuracy and limitations. Am J Med 1991; 90:30-40. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997; 204:357-362. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13 De Cobelli F, Venturini M, Vanzulli A, et al. Renal arterial stenosis: prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2000; 214:373-380. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Volk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1583-1588. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Völk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, et al. Renal time-resolved MR angiography: quantitative comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine with different doses. Radiology 2001; 220:484-488. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mittal TK, Evans C, Perkins T, Wood AM. Renal arteriography using gadolinium enhanced 3D MR angiography: clinical experience with the technique, its limitations and pitfalls. Br J Radiol 2001; 74:495-502. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Feb 2003