Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness of infracoccygeal transperineal ultrasonography (US) in differentiation between high- and low-type imperforate anus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infracoccygeal US was prospectively performed with a 7–10-MHz linear-array transducer prior to corrective surgery in 14 neonates with imperforate anus. The approach site was just inferior to the coccyx and posterior to the anus. Transverse images of the anorectal area were obtained. The puborectalis muscle was identified, and the relationship between the puborectalis muscle and the distal rectal pouch was evaluated. US findings were compared with surgical findings.
RESULTS: In 10 neonates, a low-type imperforate anus was correctly diagnosed at infracoccygeal US. In those with low-type imperforate anus, the puborectalis muscle was seen as a hypoechoic U-shaped band (n = 10), and the distal rectal pouch passed through the puborectalis muscle (n = 10). In four neonates with high-type imperforate anus, the puborectalis muscle was not identified (n = 4).
CONCLUSION: Infracoccygeal transperineal US enables the determination of the type of imperforate anus.
© RSNA, 2003
References
- 1 Seibert JJ, Golladay ES. Clinical evaluation of imperforate anus: clue to type of anal-rectal anomaly. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979; 133:289-292. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 2 Schuster SR, Teele RL. An analysis of ultrasound scanning as a guide in determining “high” or “low” imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 1979; 14:798-800. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 3 Oppenheimer DA, Carroll BA, Shochat SJ. Sonography of imperforate anus. Radiology 1983; 148:127-128. Link, Google Scholar
- 4 Donaldson JS, Black CT, Reynolds M, Sherman JO, Shkolnik A. Ultrasound of the distal pouch in infants with imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24:465-468. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 5 Han TI, Kim IO, Kim WS, et al. US identification of the anal sphincter complex and levator ani muscle in neonates: infracoccygeal approach. Radiology 2000; 217:392-394. Link, Google Scholar
- 6 Santulli TV, Kiesewetter WB, Bill AH, Jr. Anorectal anomalies: a suggested international classification. J Pediatr Surg 1970; 5:281-287. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 7 Stephens FD. Wingspread anomalies, rarities, and super rarities of the anorectum and cloaca. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1988; 24:581-585. Medline, Google Scholar
- 8 Berdon WE, Baker DH, Santuilli TV, Amoury R. The radiologic evaluation of imperforate anus: an approach correlated with current surgical concepts. Radiology 1968; 90:446-471. Google Scholar
- 9 Narasimharao KL, Prasad GR, Katariya S, Yadav K, Mitra SK, Pathak IC. Prone cross-table lateral view: an alternative to the invertogram in imperforate anus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140:227-229. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 10 Kohda E, Fujioka M, Ikawa H, Yokoyama J. Congenital anorectal anomaly: CT evaluation. Radiology 1985; 157:349-352. Link, Google Scholar
- 11 Ikawa H, Yokoyama J, Sanbonmatsu T, et al. The use of computerized tomography to evaluate anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1985; 20:640-644. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 12 Mezzacappa PM, Price AP, Haller JO, Kassner EG, Hansbrough F. MR and CT demonstration of levator sling in congenital anorectal anomalies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11:273-275. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 13 Sato Y, Pringle KC, Bergman RA, et al. Congenital anorectal anomalies: MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168:157-162. Link, Google Scholar
- 14 McHugh K, Dudley NE, Tam P. Pre-operative MRI of anorectal anomalies in the newborn period. Pediatr Radiol 1995; 25:33-36. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 15 Kim IO, Han TI, Kim WS, Yeon KM. Transperineal ultrasonography in imperforate anus: identification of the internal fistula. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19:211-216. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 16 Currarino G. The various types of anorectal fistula in male imperforate anus. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26:512-522. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 17 Paidas CN, Pena A. Rectum and anus. In: Oldham KT, Colombani PM, Foglia RP, eds. Surgery of infants and children. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1997; 1331-1362. Google Scholar
- 18 Appignani BA, Jaramillo D, Barnes PD, Poussaint TY. Dysraphic myelodysplasias associated with urogenital and anorectal anomalies: prevalence and types seen with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:1199-1203. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 19 Kiesewetter WB, Bill AH, Nixon HH, Santulli TV. Imperforate anus. Arch Surg 1976; 111:518-525. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 20 Hedlund H, Pena A. Does the distal rectal muscle in anorectal malformations have the functional properties of a sphincter? J Pediatr Surg 1990; 25:985-989. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 21 Pena A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 1982; 17:796-811. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 22 Taccone A, Martucciello G, Dodero P, et al. New concepts in preoperative imaging of anorectal malformation: new concepts in imaging of ARM. Pediatr Radiol 1992; 22:196-199. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 23 Wesson DE, Haddock G. The intestines. In: Craven L, eds. Pediatric gastrointestinal disease. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1996; 561-562. Google Scholar
- 24 Pena A. Management of anorectal malformations during the newborn period. World J Surg 1993; 17:385-392. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 25 Oldham KT, Coran AG, Wesley JR. Pediatric abdomen. In: Greenfield LJ, eds. Surgery: scientific principles and practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1997; 2041-2046. Google Scholar
