Rheumatoid Hand Joint Synovitis: Gray-Scale and Power Doppler US Quantifications Following Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor–α Treatment: Pilot Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate by using B-mode and power Doppler ultrasonography (US) and clinical assessment the response of hand joint synovitis in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to treatment with the anti–tumor necrosis factor–α agent infliximab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints in 11 patients with active RA were assessed before and 6 weeks after three infliximab infusions. US assessment was performed at a single site in the MCP and PIP joints and at two sites (radiocarpal and intercarpal) in the wrists. Twenty measurements were performed in the wrists; 110 measurements, in the MCP joints; and 103 measurements, in the PIP joints. Two wrists and seven PIP joints were excluded owing to complete joint destruction. US parameters (synovial thickness, number of US-positive joints [ie, with synovial thickness ≥ 1 mm], cumulative synovial thickness index, and presence of Doppler signal) and clinical parameters (swollen joint count) were independently assessed and compared with baseline values by using the McNemar χ2 and paired Student t tests.

RESULTS: After infliximab treatment, there was a significant decrease in the mean numbers of swollen and US-positive joints and in the cumulative synovial thickness (P < .05). The mean synovial thickness decreased in all joints swollen at baseline and in the MCP and PIP joints not swollen at baseline (P < .01). Change from baseline cumulative synovial thickness correlated significantly with change in disease activity score (r = 0.69, P < .05). The number of positive Doppler US signals decreased significantly (in 13 US-positive joints at baseline, in five after treatment; P < .05).

CONCLUSION: US is a feasible imaging modality for measurement of the response of RA small-joint synovitis to therapy.

© RSNA, 2003

References

  • 1 Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, et al. Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42:1232-1254.
  • 2 Østergaard M, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42:918-929.
  • 3 Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, et al. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43:2762-2770.
  • 4 Newman JS, Laing TJ, McCarthy CJ, Adler RS. Power Doppler sonography of synovitis: assessment of the therapeutic response—preliminary observations. Radiology 1996; 198:582-584.
  • 5 Stenger AAME, van Leeuwen MA, Houtman PM, et al. Early effective suppression of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis reduces radiographic progression. Br J Rheum 1998; 37:1157-1163.
  • 6 Klinkhoff AV, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, et al. An experiment in reducing interobserver variability of the examination for joint tenderness. J Rheumatol 1988; 15:492-494.
  • 7 Gibbon WW, Wakefield RJ. Ultrasound in inflammatory disease. Radiol Clin North Am 1999; 37:633-651.
  • 8 Chhem RK, van Holsbeeck MT. Sonography of rheumatoid disease. In: van Holsbeeck MT, Introcaso JH, eds. Musculoskeletal ultrasound. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 2001; 373-392.
  • 9 Gordon DA, Hastings DE. Rheumatoid arthritis: clinical features—early, progressive and late disease. In: Klippel JH, Dieppe PA, eds. Rheumatology. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1998; 53.1-5.3.14.
  • 10 McGonagle D, Conaghan PG, Wakefield R, Emery P. Imaging the joints in early rheumatoid arthritis. Bailleres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2001; 15:91-104.
  • 11 Foley ND, Stack JP, Ryan M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with plain film radiographs. Br J Rheumatol 1991; 30:101-106.
  • 12 Klarlund M, Østergaard M, Gideon P, Sorensen K, Jensen KE, Lorenzen I. Wrist and finger joint MR imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Radiol 1999; 40:400-409.
  • 13 König HK, Sieper J, Wolf KJ. Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1990; 176:473-477.
  • 14 Sugimoto H, Takeda A, Hyodoh K. Early-stage rheumatoid arthritis: prospective study of the effectiveness of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 2000; 216:569-575.
  • 15 Grassi W, Tittarelli E, Pirani O, Avaltroni D, Cervini C. Ultrasound examination of metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1993; 22:243-247.
  • 16 Lund PJ, Heikal A, Maricic MJ, Krupinski EA, Williams CS. Ultrasonographic imaging of the hand and wrist in rheumatoid arthritis. Skeletal Radiol 1995; 24:572-577.
  • 17 Hau M, Shultz H, Tony HP, et al. Evaluation of pannus and vascularization of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis by high-resolution ultrasound (multidimensional linear array). Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42:2303-2308.
  • 18 Qvistgaard E, Rogind H, Torp-Pedersen S, Terslev L, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H. Quantitative ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of inflammation by Doppler technique. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60:690-693.
  • 19 Stone M, Bergin D, Whelan B, Maher M, Murray J, McCarthy C. Power Doppler ultrasound assessment of rheumatoid hand synovitis. J Rheumatol 2001; 28:1979-1982.
  • 20 Schmidt WA. Value of sonography in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2001; 357:1056-1057.
  • 21 Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Østergaard M. Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44:2018-2023.
  • 22 Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Thomsen H, Østergaard M. Interobserver agreement of ultrasound examination in assessment of the small joints of the hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis (abstr). Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60(suppl 1):267.
  • 23 van Holsbeeck M, van Holsbeeck K, Gevers G, et al. Staging and follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis of the knee. J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7:561-566.
  • 24 Feldmann M, Maini RN. Anti-TNFα therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: what have we learned? Annu Rev Immunol 2001; 19:163-196.
  • 25 Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31:315-324.
  • 26 Fries JF, Spitz P, Young DY. The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales. J Rheumatol 1982; 9:789-793.
  • 27 Prevoo ML, van’t Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts: development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38:44-48.
  • 28 van Riel PLCM, Schumacher HR, Jr. How does one assess early rheumatoid arthritis in daily clinical practice? Bailleres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2001; 15:67-76.
  • 29 Ferrell WR, Balint PV, Egan CG, Lockhart JC, Sturrock RD. Metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: laser Doppler imaging—initial experience. Radiology 2001; 220:257-262.
  • 30 Marcelis S, Daenen B, Ferrara MA. Basic signs of pathology: capsule. In: Dondelinger RF, eds. Peripheral musculoskeletal ultrasound atlas. Stuttgart, Germany: George Thieme Verlag, 1996; 39-41.
  • 31 Schmidt WA, Völker L, Zacher J, Schläfke M, Ruhnke M, Gromnica-Ihle E. Colour Doppler ultrasonography to detect pannus in knee joint synovitis. Clin Exp Rheum 2000; 18:439-444.
  • 32 Snedecor GW. Queries. Biometrics 1952; 8:85-88.
  • 33 van Gestel AM, Prevoo MLL, van’t Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LBA, van Riel PLCM. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39:34-40.
  • 34 Fiocco U, Cozzi L, Rubaltelli L, et al. Long-term sonographic follow-up of rheumatoid and psoriatic proliferative knee joint synovitis. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35:155-163.
  • 35 Hau M, Kneitz C, Tony HP, Keberle M, Jahns R, Jenett M. High resolution ultrasound detects a decrease in pannus vascularisation of small finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving treatment with soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptor (etanercept). Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61:55-58.
  • 36 Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, Radke S, Faehndrich TP, Gohlke F. Correlation of power Doppler sonography with vascularity of the synovial tissue of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44:331-338.
  • 37 Kaye O, Marcelis S, Andre B, Ribbens C, Mathy L, Malaise MG. Power Doppler positivity is correlated to synovial thickness in rheumatoid arthritis (abstr). Arthritis Rheum 2001; 60(suppl):1030, S224.

Article History

Published in print: Nov 2003