"skipMainNavigation"
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Thoracic Imaging

    Low-Kilovoltage Multi–Detector Row Chest CT in Adults: Feasibility and Effect on Image Quality and Iodine Dose

    Published Online:Apr 1 2004https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2311030191

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of low-kilovoltage (ie, 80-kV) chest computed tomography (CT) protocols for adults and the effect of such protocols on image quality and iodine dose.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preliminarily, 90 patients (30 women, 60 men; mean age, 59 years) requiring contrast material–enhanced chest CT were randomly assigned to one of three protocol groups: protocol A, with use of 80 kV and 135 mAs; protocol B, with use of 80 kV and 180 mAs; or the standard protocol, with use of 120 kV and 90 mAs. Contrast material injection protocols were standardized in all groups. Image noise was calculated and plotted against patient weight. Subsequently, another 52 consecutive patients (11 women, 41 men; mean age, 57 years) were assigned to one of the protocols according to their weight: Patients weighing less than 60 kg were assigned to protocol A; patients weighing 60–75 kg, to protocol B; and patients weighing more than 75 kg, to the standard protocol. Two readers evaluated the CT images qualitatively by using a five-point scale. Statistical analyses were performed by using analysis of variance, κ, and Fisher exact tests.

    RESULTS: In the preliminary study, the mean image noise values with protocols A (24 HU) and B (20 HU) were significantly higher (P < .001) than that with the standard protocol (12 HU). With protocols A and B, in the patients weighing more than 60 kg and more than 75 kg, respectively, the noise increased exponentially with patient weight. In the subsequent study, qualitative analysis revealed no significant difference between the low-kilovoltage examinations and the standard examination. Compared with use of the standard protocol, use of protocols A and B resulted in the iodine-based contrast material dose being reduced by 54% and 39%, respectively.

    CONCLUSION: Weight-adapted low-kilovoltage contrast-enhanced chest CT examinations can be routinely performed with 80 kV. Use of these protocols results in good diagnostic image quality and makes it possible to reduce contrast material use by more than 50%.

    © RSNA, 2004

    References

    • 1 Galanski M, Hidajat N, Maier W, Nagel HD, Schmidt T. In: Nagel HD, eds. Radiation exposure in computed tomography: fundamentals, influencing parameters, dose assessment, optimisation, scanner data, and terminology. 2nd ed. Hamburg, Germany: Offizin Paul Hartung Druck, 2002; 1-3.
      Google Scholar
    • 2 Takahashi M, Maguire WM, Ashtari M, et al. Low-dose spiral computed tomography of the thorax: comparison with the standard-dose technique. Invest Radiol 1998; 33:68-73.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Ravenel JG, Scalzetti EM, Huda W, Garrisi W. Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:279-284.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Lucaya J, Piqueras J, Garcia-Pena P, Enriquez G, Garcia-Macias M, Sotil J. Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:985-992.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:303-306.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Wildberger JE, Mahnken AH, Schmitz-Rode T, et al. Individually adapted examination protocols for reduction of radiation exposure in chest CT. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:604-611.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Slovis TL. ALARA conference proceedings: the ALARA concept in pediatric CT—intelligent dose reduction (editorial). Pediatr Radiol 2002; 32:217-317.
      Google Scholar
    • 8 Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psych Meas 1960; 20:37-46.
      Google Scholar
    • 9 Ware DE, Huda W, Mergo PJ, Litwiller AL. Radiation effective dose to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. Radiology 1999; 210:645-650.
      Google Scholar
    • 10 Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF. Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:297-301.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:289-296.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Rogers LF. Dose reduction in CT: how low can we go? (editorial). AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:299.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, McLoud T, Rhea J. Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:461-465.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Huda W, Atherton JV, Ware DE, Cumming WA. An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. Radiology 1997; 203:417-422.
      Google Scholar
    • 15 Suess C, Chen X. Dose optimization in pediatric CT: current technology and future innovations. Pediatr Radiol 2002; 32:729-734.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Diederich S, Lenzen H, Puskas Z, et al. Low dose computerized tomography of the thorax: experimental and clinical studies. Radiologe 1996; 36:483-488.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G. Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 2000; 217:430-435.
      Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: Apr 2004