Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Pediatric Imaging

    Suspected Appendicitis in Children: Diagnosis with Contrast-enhanced versus Nonenhanced Helical CT

    Published Online:May 1 2004https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312030240

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of limited-area (lower abdominal) nonenhanced helical computed tomography (CT), intravenous contrast material–enhanced helical CT of the entire abdomen, and the combination of both.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred six children suspected of having appendicitis, who were previously included in a prospective study, underwent limited-area nonenhanced helical CT of the lower abdomen and contrast-enhanced CT of the entire abdomen. No oral or rectal contrast material was administered. The CT scans were retrospectively reviewed by three independent readers both separately and together. The readers were blinded to all clinical information and to the results of previous ultrasonographic and CT examinations. Final diagnoses were established on the basis of surgical, histopathologic, or clinical follow-up findings. The Pearson χ2 test was performed to compare values between groups. The Student two-sample t test was performed to determine statistically significant differences in age and sex.

    RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients (42%) had appendicitis. Readers diagnosed appendicitis with 66% pooled sensitivity and 96% pooled specificity with limited-area nonenhanced CT. With contrast-enhanced CT of the entire abdomen, appendicitis was diagnosed with 90% pooled sensitivity and 94% pooled specificity. With both sequences together, readers diagnosed appendicitis with 90% pooled sensitivity and 94% pooled specificity. The difference between the sensitivity of limited-area nonenhanced CT and that of contrast-enhanced CT was statistically significant (P < .001).

    CONCLUSION: Sensitivity of helical CT for suspected appendicitis in children improved significantly with abdominal contrast-enhanced CT compared with limited-area nonenhanced CT. No further improvement in sensitivity was achieved with the combination of both sequences in comparison to that with contrast-enhanced CT alone.

    © RSNA, 2004

    References

    • 1 Guillerman RP, Brody AS, Kraus SJ. Evidence-based guidelines for pediatric imaging: the example of the child with possible appendicitis. Pediatr Ann 2002; 31:629-640. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 2 Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:289-296. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 3 Sivit CJ, Applegate KE, Berlin SC, et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: helical CT. Radiology 2000; 216:430-433. Link, Google Scholar
    • 4 Kaiser S, Frenckner B, Jorulf HK. Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT—a prospective randomized study. Radiology 2002; 223:633-638. Link, Google Scholar
    • 5 Lee FT, Jr, Caroline DF, Thornbury JR, et al. A randomized comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in adult body computed tomography scanning. Acad Radiol 1996; 3(suppl 3):S500-S506. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 6 Garcia Pena BM, Mandl KD, Kraus S, et al. Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children. JAMA 1999; 282:1041-1046. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 7 Sivit CJ, Applegate KE, Stallion A, et al. Imaging evaluation of suspected appendicitis in a pediatric population: effectiveness of sonography versus CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:977-980. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 8 Callahan MJ, Rodriguez DP, Taylor GA. CT of appendicitis in children. Radiology 2002; 224:325-332. Link, Google Scholar
    • 9 Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000; 215:337-348. Link, Google Scholar
    • 10 Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ. Helical CT combined with contrast material administered through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1275-1280. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 11 Mullins ME, Kircher MF, Ryan DP, et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children using limited helical CT and colonic contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:37-41. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 12 Lowe LH, Penney MW, Stein SM, et al. Unenhanced limited CT of the abdomen in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children: comparison with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:31-35. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 13 Friedland JA, Siegel MJ. CT appearance of acute appendicitis in childhood. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:439-442. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Federle MP. Focused appendix CT technique: a commentary. Radiology 1997; 202:20-21. Link, Google Scholar
    • 15 Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M, et al. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 2001; 220:683-690. Link, Google Scholar
    • 16 Grayson DE, Wettlaufer JR, Dalrymple NC, Keesling CA. Appendiceal CT in pediatric patients: relationship of visualization to amount of peritoneal fat. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:497-500. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 17 Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 1990; 175:621-628. Link, Google Scholar
    • 18 Cohen MD, Herman E, Herron D, White SJ, Smith JA. Comparison of intravenous contrast agents for CT studies in children. Acta Radiol 1992; 33:592-595. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 19 Kamel IR, Goldberg NS, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT—review of 100 cases. Radiology 2000; 217:159-163. Link, Google Scholar
    • 20 Fefferman NR, Roche KJ, Pinkney LP, Ambrosino MM, Genieser NB. Suspected appendicitis in children: focused CT technique for evaluation. Radiology 2001; 220:691-695. Link, Google Scholar
    • 21 Hahn HB, Hoepner FU, Kalle T, et al. Sonography of acute appendicitis in children: a 7 years experience. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28:147-151. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 22 Vignault F, Filiatrault D, Brandt ML, Garel L, Grignon A, Ouimet A. Acute appendicitis in children: evaluation with US. Radiology 1990; 176:501-504. Link, Google Scholar
    • 23 Migraine S, Atri M, Bret PM, Lough JO, Hinchey JE. Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: clinical and sonographical documentation. Radiology 1997; 205:55-58. Link, Google Scholar
    • 24 Karakas SP, Guelfguat M, Leonidas JC, Springer S, Singh SP. Acute appendicitis in children: comparison of clinical diagnosis with ultrasound and CT imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2000; 30:94-98. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: May 2004