Malignant versus Benign Nodules at CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Comparison of Thin-Section CT Findings
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate thin-section computed tomographic (CT) characteristics of malignant nodules on the basis of overall appearance (pure ground-glass opacity [GGO], mixed GGO, or solid opacity) in comparison with the appearance of benign nodules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained. Follow-up diagnostic CT was performed in 747 suspicious pulmonary nodules detected at low-dose CT screening (17 892 examinations). Of 747 nodules, 222 were evaluated at thin-section CT (1-mm collimation), which included 59 cancers and 163 benign nodules (3–20 mm). Thin-section CT findings of malignant versus benign nodules with pure GGO (17 vs 12 lesions), mixed GGO (27 vs 29 lesions), or solid opacity (15 vs 122 lesions) were analyzed. Fisher exact test for independence was used to compare differences in shape, margin, and internal features between benign and malignant nodules. Positive predictive value (PPV) was analyzed when a category was significantly different from the others.
RESULTS: Among nodules with pure GGO, a round shape was found more frequently in malignant lesions (11 of 17, 65%) than in benign lesions (two of 12, 17%; P = .02; PPV, 85%); mixed GGO, a subtype with GGO in the periphery and a high-attenuation zone in the center, was seen much more often in malignant lesions (11 of 27, 41%) than in benign lesions (two of 29, 7%; P = .004; PPV, 85%). Among solid nodules, a polygonal shape or a smooth or somewhat smooth margin was present less frequently in malignant than in benign lesions (polygonal shape: 7% vs 38%, P = .02; smooth or somewhat smooth margin: 0% vs 63%, P < .001), and 98% (46 of 47) of polygonal nodules and 100% (77 of 77) of nodules with a smooth or somewhat smooth margin were benign.
CONCLUSION: Recognition of certain characteristics at thin-section CT can be helpful in differentiating small malignant nodules from benign nodules.
© RSNA, 2004
References
- 1 Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:1053-1057.
- 2 Yang ZG, Sone S, Takashima T, et al. High-resolution CT analysis of small peripheral lung adenocarcinomas revealed on screening helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1399-1407.
- 3 Takashima S, Sone S, Li F, et al. Small solitary pulmonary nodules (< or = 1 cm) redetected at population-based CT screening for lung cancer: reliable high-resolution CT features of benign lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:955-964.
- 4 Zwirewich CV, Vedal S, Miller RR, Müller NL. Solitary pulmonary nodule: high-resolution CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1991; 179:469-476.
- 5 Kuriyama K, Tateishi R, Doi O, et al. Prevalence of air bronchograms in small peripheral carcinomas of the lung on thin-section CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156:921-924.
- 6 Li F, Sone S, Takashima S, et al. Correlations between high-resolution computed tomographic, magnetic resonance and pathological findings in cases with non-cancers but suspicious lung nodules. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1782-1789.
- 7 Kohno N, Ikezoe J, Johkoh T, et al. Focal organizing pneumonia: CT appearance. Radiology 1993; 189:119-123.
- 8 Proto AV, Thomas SR. Pulmonary nodules studied by computed tomography. Radiology 1985; 156:149-153.
- 9 Zerhouni EA, Stitik FP, Siegelman SS, et al. CT of the pulmonary nodule: a cooperative study. Radiology 1986; 160:319-327.
- 10 Siegelman SS, Khouri NF, Leo FP, Fishman EK, Braverman RM, Zerhouni EA. Solitary pulmonary nodules: CT assessment. Radiology 1986; 160:307-312.
- 11 Li F, Sone S, Takashima S, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M, Yang ZG. Roentgenologic analysis of 108 non-cancerous focal lung lesions detected in screening CT for lung cancer. Jpn J Lung Cancer 1999; 39:369- 380.
