Breast Imaging

Small (<2.0-cm) Breast Cancers: Mammographic and US Findings at US-guided Cryoablation—Initial Experience

Published Online:Dec 1 2004https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333031734

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the mammographic and ultrasonographic (US) findings at cryoablation of small solitary invasive breast cancers and compare them with presence of residual malignancy after treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained. Nine patients with small solitary invasive breast cancers diagnosed at core biopsy were treated with US-guided cryoablation and a 2.7-mm cryoprobe. Mean cancer size was 12 mm (range, 8–18 mm); four were palpable. Tabletop argon gas–based cryoablation system with a double–freeze-thaw protocol was used to treat cancers in outpatient setting. Tumor sites were excised at lumpectomy 2–3 weeks after cryoablation. Findings at mammography and US before, during, and after cryoablation were assessed to categorize densities and masses on mammograms and masses on US images with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS); maximum cancer size was measured. Imaging findings and clinical breast examination data were compared with histologic findings from lumpectomy specimens to determine presence of intraductal or invasive cancer.

RESULTS: With US guidance, ice balls (maximal mean size, 4.4 cm) were formed around cancers. Before excision, eight patients underwent mammography; all had new focal densities (maximum size, 2.5–5.0 cm) at cancer sites. Six patients underwent preexcisional US; 100% of them had new hyperechogenicity in tissue surrounding cancer site. Seven (78%) of nine patients had no residual cancer; specimens contained fat necrosis. One patient had a small focus of invasive cancer; one had extensive multifocal ductal carcinoma in situ. Patients with BI-RADS category 1 or 2 densities on mammograms or nonpalpable tumors had no residual malignancy. No residual invasive cancer occurred in tumors 17 mm or smaller or in cancers without spiculated margins at US.

CONCLUSION: After cryoablation, there was increased echogenicity at US and increased density at mammography; these findings were observed in areas that approximated location and size of the ice ball. Tumor size, mammographic density, and US characteristics may be indicators of likelihood of complete cryoablation.

References

1 American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2004. Available at: www.cancer.org. Accessed September 27 2004.
Google Scholar
2 Cady B, Stone MD, Schuler JG, Thakur R, Wanner MA, Levin PT. The new era in breast cancer: invasion, size and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. Arch Surg 1996; 131:301-308.
Medline Google Scholar
3 Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Wray L, Helvie MA. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Radiology 2004; 230:42-48.
Google Scholar
4 Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1227-1232.
Medline Google Scholar
5 Jeffrey SS, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of breast cancer: first report of an emerging technology. Arch Surg 1999; 134:1064-1068.
Medline Google Scholar
6 Stanton A, Krishnan L, Collins C. Form or function? I. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer 2001; 91:2273-2281.
Google Scholar
7 Izzo F, Thomas R, Delrio P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in patients with primary breast carcinoma: a pilot study in 26 patients. Cancer 2001; 92:2036-2044.
Medline Google Scholar
8 Fornage BD, Sneige N, Ross MI, et al. Small (< or = 2-cm) breast cancer treated with US-guided radiofrequency ablation: feasibility study. Radiology 2004; 231:215-224.
Google Scholar
9 Singletary SE, Fornage BD, Sneige N, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of early-stage invasive breast tumors: an overview. Cancer J 2002; 8:177-180.
Medline Google Scholar
10 Staren ED, Sabel MS, Gianakakis LM, et al. Cryosurgery of breast cancer. Arch Surg 1997; 132:28-33; discussion 34.
Medline Google Scholar
11 Pfleiderer SO, Freesmeyer MG, Marx C, Kuhne-Heid R, Schneider A, Kaiser WA. Cryotherapy of breast cancer under ultrasound guidance: initial results and limitations. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:3009-3014.
Medline Google Scholar
12 Robinson DS, Parel JM, Denham DB, et al. Interstitial laser hyperthermia model development for minimally invasive therapy of breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186:284-292.
Medline Google Scholar
13 Robinson DS, Parel JM, Denham DB, et al. Stereotactic uses beyond core biopsy: model development for minimally invasive treatment of breast cancer through interstitial laser hyperthermia. Am Surg 1996; 62:117-118.
Medline Google Scholar
14 Harries SA, Amin Z, Smith ME, et al. Interstitial laser photocoagulation as a treatment for breast cancer. Br J Surg 1994; 81:1617-1619.
Medline Google Scholar
15 Dowlatshahi K, Bauich D, Kluiber R. Histologic evaluation of rat mammary tumor necrosis by interstitial Nd:YAG laser hyperthermia. Lasers Surg Med 1992; 12:159-164.
Medline Google Scholar
16 Dowlatshahi K, Fan M, Gould VE, Bloom KJ, Ali A. Stereotactically guided laser therapy of occult breast tumors: work in progress report. Arch Surg 2000; 135:1345-1352.
Medline Google Scholar
17 Dowlatshahi K, Francescatti DS, Bloom KJ. Laser therapy for small breast cancers. Am J Surg 2002; 184:359-363.
Medline Google Scholar
18 Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Wotherspoon A, et al. Laser therapy for breast cancer: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996; 200:651-658.
Google Scholar
19 Harms SE, Klimberg VS, Henry-Tilman R, Kourourian S, Mumtaz H, Lindquist D. MRI directed laser therapy for benign and malignant breast neoplasms: clinical follow-up and histologic correlation (abstr). Radiology 2000; 217(P):267.
Google Scholar
20 Hill CR, ter Haar GR. High intensity focused ultrasound: potential for cancer treatment. Br J Radiol 1995; 68:1296-1303.
Medline Google Scholar
21 ter Haar G. Ultrasound focal beam surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21:1089-1100.
Medline Google Scholar
22 Bohris C, Jenne JW, Rastert R, et al. MR monitoring of focused ultrasound surgery (FUS) in a breast tissue model. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19:167-175.
Medline Google Scholar
23 Hynynen K, Darkazanli A, Unger E, Schenck JF. MRI-guided noninvasive ultrasound surgery. Med Phys 1993; 20:107-115.
Medline Google Scholar
24 Chung AH, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. Thermal dosimetry of a focused ultrasound beam in vivo by magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys 1999; 26:2017-2026.
Medline Google Scholar
25 Graham SJ, Chen L, Leitch M, et al. Quantifying tissue damage due to focused ultrasound heating observed by MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 41:321-328.
Medline Google Scholar
26 Hynynen K, Pomeroy O, Smith DN, et al. MR imaging–guided focused ultrasound surgery of fibroadenomas in the breast: a feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219:176-185.
Google Scholar
27 Huber PE, Jenne JW, Rastert R, et al. A new non-invasive approach in breast cancer therapy using magnetic resonance imaging guided focused ultrasound surgery. Cancer Res 2001; 61:8441-8447.
Medline Google Scholar
28 Gianfelice D, Khiat A, Amara M, Belblidia A, Boulanger Y. MR imaging-guided focused US ablation of breast cancer: histopathologic assessment of effectiveness—initial experience. Radiology 2003; 227:849-855.
Google Scholar
29 Chaudhary SS, Mishra RK, Swarup A, Thomas JM. Dielectric properties of normal and malignant human breast tissue at radiowave and microwave frequencies. Indian J Biochem Biophys 1984; 21:76-79.
Medline Google Scholar
30 Joines WT, Zhang Y, Li C, Jirtle RL. The measured electrical properties of normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz. Med Phys 1994; 21:547-550.
Medline Google Scholar
31 Campbell AM, Land DV. Dielectric properties of female human breast tissue measured in vitro at 3.2 GHz. Phys Med Biol 1992; 37:193-210.
Medline Google Scholar
32 Gardner RA, Vargas HI, Block JB, et al. Focused microwave phased array thermotherapy for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9:326-332.
Medline Google Scholar
33 Sabel MS, Kaufman CS, Whitworth P, et al. Cryoablation of early-stage breast cancer: work-in-progress report of a multi-institutional trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11:542-549.
Medline Google Scholar
34 Kaufman CS, Bachman B, Littrup PJ, et al. Office-based ultrasound-guided cryoablation of breast fibroadenomas. Am J Surg 2002; 184:394-400.
Medline Google Scholar
35 Rui J, Tatsutani KN, Dahiya R, Rubinsky B. Effect of thermal variables on human breast cancer in cryosurgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999; 53:185-192.
Medline Google Scholar
36 American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
Google Scholar
37 Goldberg S, Charboneau J, Dodd G, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: proposal for standardization of terms and reporting criteria. Radiology 2003; 228:335-345.
Google Scholar
38 Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1233-1241.
Medline Google Scholar
39 Gage AA. Cryosurgery for oral and pharyngeal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1969; 118:669-672.
Medline Google Scholar
40 Bilchik AJ, Sarantou T, Wardlaw JC, Ramming KP. Cryosurgery causes a profound reduction in tumor markers in hepatoma and noncolorectal hepatic metastases. Am Surg 1997; 63:796-800.
Medline Google Scholar
41 Caleffi M, Borghetti K, Graudenz M, et al. Preliminary report of an argon-based cryosurgical system for the minimally-invasive treatment of breast disease (abstr). 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, New Orleans, La, May 20–24 2000.
Google Scholar
42 Gage AA, Huben R. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate. Urol Oncol 2000; 5:11-19.
Medline Google Scholar
43 Tanaka S. Cryosurgical treatment of advanced breast cancer. Skin Cancer 1995; 10:9-18.
Google Scholar
44 Suzuki Y. Cryosurgical treatment of advanced breast cancer and cryoimmunological responses. Skin Cancer 1995; 10:19-26.
Google Scholar
45 Johnson JP. Immunologic aspects of cryosurgery: potential modulation of immune recognition and effector cell maturation. Clin Dermatol 1990; 8:39-47.
Medline Google Scholar
46 Wood TF, Ravindranath MH, Perez CA, et al. Cryosurgical ablation of hepatic colorectal carcinoma metastases induces autoimmunization with tumor specific antibodies (abstr). 54th Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Washington, DC, March 15–18 2001.
Google Scholar
47 Ablin RJ. An appreciation and realization of the concept of cryoimmunology. In: Onik GM, Rubinsky B, Watson G, Ablin RJ, eds. Percutaneous prostate cryoablation. St Louis, Mo: Quality Medical Publishing, 1995; 136-154.
Google Scholar
48 Bilgen IG, Ustun EE, Memis A. Fat necrosis of the breast: clinical, mammographic and sonographic features. Eur J Radiol 2001; 39:92-99.
Medline Google Scholar
49 Soo MS, Kornguth PJ, Hertzberg BS. Fat necrosis in the breast: sonographic features. Radiology 1998; 206:261-269.
Google Scholar
50 Kamaya A, Tuthill T, Rubin JM. Twinkling artifact on color Doppler sonography: dependence on machine parameters and underlying cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:215-222.
Medline Google Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Dec 2004

Vol. 233, No. 3

Metrics

Altmetric Score

PDF download