Intracortical Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Improved Detection with 3D Double Inversion-Recovery MR Imaging

References

• 1 Ferguson B, Matyszak MK, Esiri MM, Perry VH. Axonal damage in acute multiple sclerosis lesions. Brain 1997; 120: 393–399.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2 Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 278–285.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Catalaa I, Fulton JC, Zhang X, et al. MR imaging quantitation of gray matter involvement in multiple sclerosis and its correlation with disability measures and neurocognitive testing. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1613–1618.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4 Kidd D, Barkhof F, McConnell R, Algra PR, Allen IV, Revesz T. Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1999; 122: 17–26.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5 Rovaris M, Filippi M, Minicucci L, et al. Cortical/subcortical disease burden and cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 402–408.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6 Rovaris M, Filippi M. MRI correlates of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurovirol 2000; 6(suppl 2): S172–S175.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7 Filippi M. Linking structural, metabolic and functional changes in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 2001; 8: 291–297.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8 Ge Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, Babb JS, Kolson DL, McGowan JC. Magnetization transfer ratio histogram analysis of gray matter in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 470–475.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9 Bozzali M, Cercignani M, Sormani MP, Comi G, Filippi M. Quantification of brain gray matter damage in different MS phenotypes by use of diffusion tensor MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 985–988.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10 Brownell B, Hughes JT. The distribution of plaques in the cerebrum in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1962; 25: 315–320.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 11 Lumsden CE. The neuropathology of multiple sclerosis. In: Vinken PJ, Bruin GW, eds. Handbook of clinical neurology. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1970; 217–309.
  Google Scholar
• 12 Peterson JW, Bo L, Mork S, Chang A, Trapp BD. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 389–400.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13 Bo L, Vedeler CA, Nyland HI, Trapp BD, Mork SJ. Subpial demyelination in the cerebral cortex of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2003; 62: 723–732.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14 Lazeron RH, Langdon DW, Filippi M, et al. Neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis patients: the role of (juxta)cortical lesion on FLAIR. Mult Scler 2000; 6: 280–285.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15 Rovaris M, Iannucci G, Falautano M, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with mildly disabling relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an exploratory study with diffusion tensor MR imaging. J Neurol Sci 2002; 195: 103–109.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16 De Stefano N, Matthews PM, Filippi M, et al. Evidence of early cortical atrophy in MS: relevance to white matter changes and disability. Neurology 2003; 60: 1157–1162.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17 Tubridy N, Barker GJ, MacManus DG, Moseley IF, Miller DH. Three-dimensional fast fluid attenuated inversion recovery (3D fast FLAIR): a new MRI sequence which increases the detectable cerebral lesion load in multiple sclerosis. Br J Radiol 1998; 71: 840–845.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18 Moriarty DM, Blackshaw AJ, Talbot PR, et al. Memory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis corresponds to juxtacortical lesion load on fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1956–1962.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 Bakshi R, Ariyaratana S, Benedict RH, Jacobs L. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging detects cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 742–748.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 20 Tan IL, Pouwels PJ, van Schijndel RA, Ader HJ, Manoliu RA, Barkhof F. Isotropic 3D fast FLAIR imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis patients: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 559–567.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21 Bedell BJ, Narayana PA. Implementation and evaluation of a new pulse sequence for rapid acquisition of double inversion recovery images for simultaneous suppression of white matter and CSF. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 544–547.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22 Turetschek K, Wunderbaldinger P, Bankier AA, et al. Double inversion recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16: 127–135.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23 Pouwels PJ, Kuijer JP, Korf ES, Geurts JJ, Barkhof F. 3D-double inversion recovery for high resolution gray matter brain imaging (abstr). In: Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002; 1290.
  Google Scholar
• 24 Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983; 13: 227–231.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 25 Bo L, Vedeler CA, Nyland H, Trapp BD, Mork SJ. Intracortical multiple sclerosis lesions are not associated with increased lymphocyte infiltration. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 323–331.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26 Ge Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, Babb JS, Mannon LJ, McGowan JC. Magnetization transfer ratio histogram analysis of normal-appearing gray matter and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26: 62–68.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27 Miller DH, Thompson AJ, Filippi M. Magnetic resonance studies of abnormalities in the normal appearing white matter and grey matter in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2003; 250: 1407–1419.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28 Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH, et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain 1997; 120: 2059–2069.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 29 McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 121–127.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 30 Cercignani M, Bozzali M, Iannucci G, Comi G, Filippi M. Magnetisation transfer ratio and mean diffusivity of normal appearing white and grey matter from patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 70: 311–317.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31 Boggild MD, Williams R, Haq N, Hawkins CP. Cortical plaques visualised by fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiology 1996; 38(suppl 1): S10–S13.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32 Redpath TW, Smith FW. Technical note: use of a double inversion recovery pulse sequence to image selectively grey or white brain matter. Br J Radiol 1994; 67: 1258–1263.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 33 Tan IL, van Schijndel RA, Pouwels PJ, Ader HJ, Barkhof F. Serial isotropic three-dimensional fast FLAIR imaging: using image registration and subtraction to reveal active multiple sclerosis lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 777–782.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 34 Mugler JP 3rd, Bao S, Mulkern RV, et al. Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000; 216: 891–899.
  Google Scholar
• 35 Zhao L, Mugler JP, Wei L, Chen N, et al. A high-resolution clinical whole-brain scan using single-slab three-dimensional T1W, T2W, and FLAIR fast spin-echo sequences (abstr). In: Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002; 1294.
  Google Scholar
• 36 Ciccarelli O, Brex PA, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Disability and lesion load in MS: a reassessment with MS functional composite score and 3D fast FLAIR. J Neurol 2002; 249: 18–24.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar