Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Diagnosis with Fast Perfusion MR Imaging and High-Spatial-Resolution MR Angiography—Preliminary Experience

PURPOSE: To determine prospectively the accuracy of a magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging and MR angiography protocol for differentiation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary arterial hypertension (CTEPH) and primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) by using parallel acquisition techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institution's internal review board, and all patients gave written consent prior to participation. A total of 29 patients (16 women; mean age, 54 years ± 17 [± standard deviation]; 13 men; mean age, 57 years ± 15) with known pulmonary hypertension were examined with a 1.5-T MR imager. MR perfusion imaging (temporal resolution, 1.1 seconds per phase) and MR angiography (matrix, 512; voxel size, 1.0 × 0.7 × 1.6 mm) were performed with parallel acquisition techniques. Dynamic perfusion images and reformatted three-dimensional MR angiograms were analyzed for occlusive and nonocclusive changes of the pulmonary arteries, including perfusion defects, caliber irregularities, and intravascular thrombi. MR perfusion imaging results were compared with those of radionuclide perfusion scintigraphy, and MR angiography results were compared with those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and/or contrast material–enhanced multi–detector row computed tomography (CT). Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of MR perfusion imaging and MR angiography were calculated. Receiver operator characteristic analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic value of MR angiography, MR perfusion imaging, and both modalities combined. For MR angiography and MR perfusion imaging, κ values were used to assess interobserver agreement.

RESULTS: A correct diagnosis was made in 26 (90%) of 29 patients by using this comprehensive MR imaging protocol. Results of MR perfusion imaging demonstrated 79% agreement (ie, identical diagnosis on a per-patient basis) with those of perfusion scintigraphy, and results of MR angiography demonstrated 86% agreement with those of DSA and/or CT angiography. Interobserver agreement was good for both MR perfusion imaging and MR angiography (κ = 0.63 and 0.70, respectively).

CONCLUSION: The combination of fast MR perfusion imaging and high-spatial-resolution MR angiography with parallel acquisition techniques enables the differentiation of PPH from CTEPH with high accuracy.

© RSNA, 2005

References

  • 1 Rich S. Primary pulmonary hypertension: executive summary from the World Symposium on primary pulmonary hypertension 1998, Evian, France, September 6–10, 1998. World Health Organization Web site. Available at: www.who.int/entity/cardiovascular_diseases/resources/publications/en/. Accessed August 2003. Google Scholar
  • 2 Fedullo PF, Auger WR, Kerr KM, Rubin LJ. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1465–1472. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rich S. Primary pulmonary hypertension. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2000; 2:135–140. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Stein PD, Woodard PK, Hull RD, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detection of acute pulmonary embolism: an in-depth review. Chest 2003; 124:2324–2328. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet 2002; 359:1643–1647. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Meaney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, Stafford-Johnson D, Hamilton BH, Prince MR. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1422–1427. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210:353–359. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wielopolski PA, Haacke EM, Adler LP. Three-dimensional MR imaging of the pulmonary vasculature: preliminary experience. Radiology 1992; 183:465–472. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Boesiger P. Sensitivity encoded cardiac MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001; 3:1–9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47:1202–1210. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Simonneau G, Galie N, Rubin LJ, et al. Clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43(suppl 12):5S–12S. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chapman PJ, Bateman ED, Benatar SR. Primary pulmonary hypertension and thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: similarities and differences. Respir Med 1990; 84:485–488. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kruger S, Haage P, Hoffmann R, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. Chest 2001; 120:1556–1561. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fink C, Bock M, Puderbach M, Schmahl A, Delorme S. Partially parallel three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lung perfusion: initial results. Invest Radiol 2003; 38:482–488. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Halliburton SS, Paschal CB, Rothpletz JD, Loyd JE. Estimation and visualization of regional and global pulmonary perfusion with 3D magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:734–740. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bock M, Schoenberg SO, Floemer F, Schad LR. Separation of arteries and veins in 3D MR angiography using correlation analysis. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43:481–487. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nakagawa T, Sakuma H, Murashima S, Ishida N, Matsumura K, Takeda K. Pulmonary ventilation-perfusion MR imaging in clinical patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:419–424. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Matsuoka S, Uchiyama K, Shima H, et al. Effect of the rate of gadolinium injection on magnetic resonance pulmonary perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15:108–113. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fishman AP. Dynamic of the pulmonary circulation. In: Hamilton WF, ed. Handbook of physiology, section 2: circulation. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society, 1963; 1708. Google Scholar
  • 20 Dietrich O, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Integrated parallel acquisition techniques (iPAT): applications for fast and cardiovascular MR imaging. Electromedica 2002; 70:133–146. Google Scholar
  • 21 Tombach B, Heindel W. Value of 1.0- M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1550–1556. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Volk M, Strotzer M, Lenhart M, et al. Renal time-resolved MR angiography: quantitative comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine with different doses. Radiology 2001; 220:484–488. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lehnhardt S, Thorsten WJ, Strecker R, et al. Assessment of pulmonary perfusion with ultrafast projection magnetic resonance angiography in comparison with lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with malignant stenosis. Invest Radiol 2002; 37:594–599. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Berthezene Y, Croisille P, Wiart M, et al. Prospective comparison of MR lung perfusion and lung scintigraphy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9:61–68. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Amundsen T, Torheim G, Kvistad KA, et al. Perfusion abnormalities in pulmonary embolism studied with perfusion MRI and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: an intra-modality and inter-modality agreement study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15:386–394. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jamieson SW, Kapelanski DP, Sakakibara N, et al. Pulmonary endarterectomy: experience and lessons learned in 1,500 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76:1457–1462. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nikolaou K, Schoenberg SO, Brix G, et al. Quantification of pulmonary blood flow and volume in healthy volunteers by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a parallel imaging technique. Invest Radiol 2004; 39:537–545. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Henk CB, Gabriel H, Fleischmann D, Schoder M, Mostbeck GH. Pulmonary hypertension and cor pulmonale [in German]. Radiologe 1997; 37:388–401. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Henk CB, Schlechta B, Grampp S, Gomischek G, Klepetko W, Mostbeck GH. Pulmonary and aortic blood flow measurements in normal subjects and patients after single lung transplantation at 0.5 T using velocity encoded cine MRI. Chest 1998; 114:771–779. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Rizi RR, Saha PK, Wang B, et al. Co-registration of acquired MR ventilation and perfusion images: validation in a porcine model. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49:13–18. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Muller CJ, Schwaiblmair M, Scheidler J, et al. Pulmonary diffusing capacity: assessment with oxygen-enhanced lung MR imaging preliminary findings. Radiology 2002; 222:499–506. LinkGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Aug 2005