"skipMainNavigation"
closeDrawerMenuopenDrawerMenu
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Breast Imaging

    The Lactating Breast: Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of Normal Tissue and Cancer

    Published Online:Nov 1 2005https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2372040837

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: To retrospectively describe the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics of normal breast tissue and breast cancer in the setting of lactation.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HIPAA-compliant study was exempt from institutional approval, and informed consent was not required. Unilateral MR imaging of 10 breasts was performed in seven lactating patients aged 27–42 years. For the three patients in whom both breasts were imaged, each breast was imaged on a separate day. Nonenhanced T1-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted images and contrast material–enhanced dynamic three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted spiral gradient-echo images interleaved with T1-weighted high-spatial-resolution 3D gradient-echo images (2.0 × 1.0 × 0.4-mm voxels) were obtained. Three readers in consensus assessed the glandular density, T2-weighted signal intensity, milk duct appearance, and contrast enhancement in normal and tumor-containing breast regions. The pharmacokinetic contrast enhancement parameters of tumors were compared with those of normal tissue by using Student t and Mann-Whitney tests.

    RESULTS: MR findings of normal breast tissue in the seven women included increased glandular density in six women, high T2-weighted signal intensity in six, dilated central ducts in seven, and rapid initial glandular contrast enhancement in seven. MR findings of invasive ductal carcinoma in five women, compared with findings of the normal glandular tissue, included lower T2-weighted signal intensity in five women, more avid and rapid contrast enhancement in five, and early contrast enhancement washout in four. One minute after contrast agent injection, tumor signal intensity increased significantly more than normal lactating tissue signal intensity (153% vs 60% from baseline, P = .016). The median two-compartment model K21 exchange rate in the tumors, 0.078 sec−1, was significantly faster than the K21 exchange rate in normal tissue, 0.011 sec−1 (P = .03).

    CONCLUSION: Normal lactating glands have increased density, high T2-weighted signal intensity, and rapid moderate contrast enhancement. Breast cancers are visible during lactation owing to their lower signal intensity and more intense initial contrast enhancement with early washout compared with normal breast tissue.

    © RSNA, 2005

    References

    • 1 DiFronzoLA, O'Connell TX. Breast cancer in pregnancy and lactation. Surg Clin North Am1996;76:267–278. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 2 LibermanL, Giess CS, Dershaw DD, Deutch BM, Petrek JA. Imaging of pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Radiology1994;191(1):245–248. Link, Google Scholar
    • 3 WooJC, Yu T, Hurd TC. Breast cancer in pregnancy: a literature review. Arch Surg2003;138:91–98. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 4 AhnBY, Kim HH, Moon WK, et al. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med2003;22:491–497. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 5 TaleleAC, Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, Yeh ED, Kopans DB. The lactating breast: MRI findings and literature review. Breast J2003;9(3):237–240. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 6 AgostonAT, Daniel BL, Herfkens RJ, et al. Intensity-modulated parametric mapping for simultaneous display of rapid dynamic and high-spatial-resolution breast MR imaging data. RadioGraphics2001;21:217–226. Link, Google Scholar
    • 7 LeongCS, Daniel BL, Herfkens RJ, et al. Characterization of breast lesion morphology with delayed 3DSSMT: an adjunct to dynamic breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging2000;11:87–96. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 8 YenYF, Han KF, Daniel BL, et al. Dynamic breast MRI with spiral trajectories: 3D versus 2D. J Magn Reson Imaging2000;11:351–359. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 9 Kubik-HuchRA, Gottstein-Aalame NM, Frenzel T, et al. Gadopentetate dimeglumine excretion into human breast milk during lactation. Radiology2000;216:555–558. Link, Google Scholar
    • 10 DanielBL, Yen YF, Glover GH, et al. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology1998;209:499–509. Link, Google Scholar
    • 11 KaiserWA. The lactating breast in the magnetic resonance tomogram: spin-echo and fat-water images. Rofo1987;146:47–51. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 12 KuhlCK, Klaschik S, Mielcarek P, Gieseke J, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging1999;9:187–196. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 13 HeywangSH, Bassermann R, Fenzl G, et al. MRI of the breast: histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol1987;7:175–178. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 WedegartnerU, Bick U, Wortler K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol2001;11:1645–1650. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 15 NunesLW, Schnall MD, Siegelman E, et al. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol1997;169:409–415. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: Nov 2005