Intracranial Aneurysms at MR Angiography: Effect of Computer-aided Diagnosis on Radiologists' Detection Performance

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on radiologists' performance in detection of intracranial aneurysms with magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study and did not require patient informed consent. Fifty maximum intensity projection MR angiograms in 50 patients were used for observer performance study. The group included 22 patients (age range, 43–86 years; mean, 60.2 years; 6 men and 16 women) with intracranial aneurysms and 28 patients (age range, 32–80 years; mean, 58.8 years; 10 men and 18 women) without aneurysms. The MR angiograms were obtained with three-dimensional time-of-flight 1.5-T MR imaging. Fifteen radiologists, including eight neuroradiologists and seven general radiologists, participated in the observer performance test. They interpreted the angiograms first without and then with the aid of the computer output by using an automated computerized scheme. The observers' performance without and with the computer output was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS: For all 15 observers, average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) value for detection of aneurysms was increased significantly from 0.931 to 0.983 (P = .001) when they used the computer output. Az values for general radiologists and neuroradiologists increased from 0.894 to 0.983 (P = .022) and from 0.963 to 0.984 (P = .014), respectively. Improvement in the performance of general radiologists in terms of the Az value was much greater than that of neuroradiologists. Performance of general radiologists with CAD (Az = 0.983) slightly exceeded that of neuroradiologists without CAD (Az = 0.963) (P = .048).

CONCLUSION: CAD improved neuroradiologists' and general radiologists' performance for detection of intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography; improvement was greater for general radiologists than it was for neuroradiologists.

© RSNA, 2005

References

  • 1 WardlawJM, White PM. The detection and management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Brain2000;123:205–221.
  • 2 International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1725–1733.
  • 3 ChangHS, Kirino T. Quantification of operative benefit for unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a theoretical approach. J Neurosurg1995;83:413–420.
  • 4 LeblancR, Worsley KJ. Surgery of unruptured, asymptomatic aneurysms: a decision analysis. Can J Neurol Sci1995;22:30–35.
  • 5 International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003; 362:103–110.
  • 6 WhitePM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V. Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms? a systematic review. Radiology2000;217:361–370.
  • 7 RuggieriPM, Poulos N, Masaryk TJ, et al. Occult intracranial aneurysms in polycystic kidney disease: screening with MR angiography. Radiology1994;191:33–39.
  • 8 RonkainenA, Puranen MI, Hernesniemi JA, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: MR angiographic screening in 400 asymptomatic individuals with increased familial risk. Radiology1995;195:35–40.
  • 9 RaaymakersTW, Buys PC, Verbeeten B Jr, et al. MR angiography as a screening tool for intracranial aneurysms: feasibility, test characteristics, and interobserver agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol1999;173:1469–1475.
  • 10 BabaY, Takahashi M, Korogi Y. Cost-effectiveness of screening unruptured cerebral aneurysms in Japan. Eur Radiol2000; 10:S362–S365.
  • 11 KorogiY, Takahashi M, Mabuchi N, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional, Fourier transform, time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology1994;193:181–186.
  • 12 KorogiY, Takahashi M, Mabuchi N, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: diagnostic accuracy of MR angiography with evaluation of maximum intensity projection and source images. Radiology1996;199:199–207.
  • 13 FreerTW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology2001;220:781–786.
  • 14 DestounisSV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley ML, Willison KM. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? initial experience. Radiology2004;232:578–584.
  • 15 MacMahonH, Engelmann R, Behlen FM, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: results of a large-scale observer test. Radiology1999;213:723–726.
  • 16 ShiraishiJ, Abe H, Engelmann R, Aoyama M, MacMahon H, Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists' performance—initial experience. Radiology2003;227:469–474.
  • 17 AwaiK, Murao K, Ozawa A, et al. Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology2004;230:347–352.
  • 18 ArimuraH, Li Q, Korogi Y, et al. Automated computerized scheme for detection of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in three-dimensional MRA. Acad Radiol2004;11:1093–1104.
  • 19 KobayashiT, Xu XW, MacMahon H, Metz CE, Doi K. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology1996;199:843–848.
  • 20 MetzCE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating (ROC) characteristic curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med1998;17:1033–1053.

Article History

Published in print: Nov 2005