Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society

Lung nodules are detected very commonly on computed tomographic (CT) scans of the chest, and the ability to detect very small nodules improves with each new generation of CT scanner. In reported studies, up to 51% of smokers aged 50 years or older have pulmonary nodules on CT scans. However, the existing guidelines for follow-up and management of noncalcified nodules detected on nonscreening CT scans were developed before widespread use of multi–detector row CT and still indicate that every indeterminate nodule should be followed with serial CT for a minimum of 2 years. This policy, which requires large numbers of studies to be performed at considerable expense and with substantial radiation exposure for the affected population, has not proved to be beneficial or cost-effective. During the past 5 years, new information regarding prevalence, biologic characteristics, and growth rates of small lung cancers has become available; thus, the authors believe that the time-honored requirement to follow every small indeterminate nodule with serial CT should be revised. In this statement, which has been approved by the Fleischner Society, the pertinent data are reviewed, the authors' conclusions are summarized, and new guidelines are proposed for follow-up and management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans.

© RSNA, 2005

References

  • 1 OstD, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med2003;348:2535–2542.
  • 2 TanBB, Flaherty KR, Kazerooni EA, Iannettoni MD; American College of Chest Physicians. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest2003;123(suppl 1):89S–96S.
  • 3 SwensenSJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Edell ES. The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med1997;157:849–855.
  • 4 MidthunDE, Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE. Evaluation of nodules detected by screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral computed tomography. Lung Cancer2003;41(suppl 2):S40.
  • 5 HenschkeCI, Yankelevitz DF, Naidich DP, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. Radiology2004;231(1):164–168.
  • 6 AberleDR, Gamsu G, Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Swensen SJ. A consensus statement of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: screening for lung cancer with helical computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging2001;16(1):65–68.
  • 7 SwensenSJ, Jett JR, Hartman T, et al. Screening for lung cancer with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology2003;226(3):756–761.
  • 8 HenschkeCI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: initial findings on repeat screening. Cancer2001;92:153–159.
  • 9 HenschkeCI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz D, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet1999;354:99–105.
  • 10 BrennerDJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology2004;231(2):440–444.
  • 11 MayoJR, Alrich J, Müller NL. Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology2003;228(1):15–21.
  • 12 ImhofH, Schibany N, Ba-Ssalamah A, et al. Spiral CT and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol2003;47(1):29–37.
  • 13 KalraMK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology2004;230(3):619–628.
  • 14 BenjaminMS, Drucker EA, McLoud T, Shepard JO. Small pulmonary nodules: detection at chest CT and outcome. Radiology2003;226(2):489–493.
  • 15 RevelMP, Lefort C, Bissery A, et al. Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. Radiology2004;231(2):459–466.
  • 16 RevelMP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology2004;231(2):453–458.
  • 17 YankelevitzDF, Gupta R, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT—preliminary experience. Radiology1999;212:561–566.
  • 18 KostisW, Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Fluture SC, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. Radiology2004;231(2):446–452.
  • 19 HasegawaM, Sone S, Takashima S, et al. Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol2000;73:1252–1259.
  • 20 UsudaK, Sato Y, Sagawa M, et al. Tumor doubling time and prognostic assessment of patients with primary lung cancer. Cancer1994;74(8):2239–2244.
  • 21 Winer-MuramHT, Jennings SG, Tarver RD, et al. Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning. Radiology2002;223(3):798–805.
  • 22 SoneS, Li F, Yang ZG, et al. Results of three-year mass screening programme for lung cancer using mobile low-dose spiral computed tomography scanner. Br J Cancer2001;84(1):25–32.
  • 23 Cancer statistics in Japan '99: index of tables—standardized cancer mortality ratio among daily smokers in Japan (cohort study 1966-1982). National Cancer Center Web site. http://www.ncc.go.jp/en/statistics/1999/tables.html. Updated December 1, 2004.
  • 24 HirayamaT. Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)1981;282(6259):183–185.
  • 25 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 1982.
  • 26 GuyattGH, Newhouse MD. Are active and passive smoking harmful? determination of causation. Chest1985;88(3):445–451.
  • 27 RischHA, Howe G, Jain M, Burch JD, Holowaty EJ, Miller AB. Are female smokers at higher risk for lung cancer than male smokers? a case-control analysis by histologic type. Am J Epidemiol1993;138(5):281–293.
  • 28 BlotWJ, McLaughlin JK. Are women more susceptible to lung cancer? J Natl Cancer Inst2004;96(11):812–813.
  • 29 ZangEA, Wynder EL. Differences in lung cancer risk between men and women: examination of the evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst1996;88:183–192.
  • 30 BainC, Feskanich D, Speizer FE, et al. Lung cancer rates in men and women with comparable histories of smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst2004;96:826–834.
  • 31 MayneST, Buenconsejo J, Janerich D. Familial cancer history and lung cancer risk in United States nonsmoking men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev1999;8:1065–1069.
  • 32 Bailey-WilsonJE, Amos CI, Pinney SM, et al. A major lung cancer susceptibility locus maps to chromosome 6q2325. Am J Hum Genet2004;75:460–474.
  • 33 LeePN. Relation between exposure to asbestos and smoking jointly and the risk of lung cancer. Occup Environ Med2001;58:145–153.
  • 34 GottliebLS, Husen LA. Lung cancer among Navajo uranium miners. Chest1982;81:449–452.
  • 35 FieldRW, Steck DJ, Smith BJ, et al. Residential radon gas exposure and lung cancer: the Iowa Radon Lung Cancer Study. Am J Epidemiol2000;151(11):1091–1102.
  • 36 SwensenSJ. CT. Screening for lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol2002;179:833–836.
  • 37 PastorinoU, Bellomi M, Landoni C, et al. Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results. Lancet2003;362:593–597.
  • 38 BachPB, Kattan M, Thornquist MD, et al. Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst2003;95(6):470–478.
  • 39 HenschkeCI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol2002;178:1053–1057.
  • 40 AokiT, Nakata H, Watanabe H, et al. Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time. AJR Am J Roentgenol2000;174:763–768.
  • 41 LiF, Sone S, Abe H, MacMahon H, Doi K. Comparison of thin section CT findings in malignant and benign nodules in CT screening for lung cancer. Radiology2004;233(3):793–798.
  • 42 GadgeelSM, Ramalingam S, Cummings G, Kraut MJ, Wozniak AJ, Gaspar LE. Lung cancer in patients < 50 years of age: the experience of an academic multidisciplinary program. Chest 1999;115(5):1232–1236.
  • 43 SwensenSJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE, et al. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology2000;214:73–80.
  • 44 RohrenEM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Clinical applications of PET in oncology. Radiology2004;231(2):305–332.
  • 45 YamagamiT, Iida S, Kato T, Tanaka O, Nishimura T. Combining fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy under CT fluoroscopy guidance: a better way to treat patients with lung nodules? AJR Am J Roentgenol2003;180:811–815.
  • 46 SuzukiK, Nagai K, Yoshida J, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Chest1999;115:563–568.
  • 47 AustinJH, Müller N, Friedman PJ, et al. Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the nomenclature committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology1996;200:327–331.
  • 48 TakashimaS, Sone S, Li F, et al. Small solitary pulmonary nodules (≤1 cm) detected at population-based CT screening for lung cancer: reliable high-resolution CT features of benign lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol2003;180:955–964.
  • 49 ErasmusJJ, Connolly JE, McAdams HP, Roggli VL. Solitary pulmonary nodules. I. Morphologic evaluation for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. RadioGraphics2000;20:43–58.
  • 50 GaerteSC, Meyer CA, Winer-Muram HT, Tarver RD, Conces DJ. Fat-containing lesions of the chest. RadioGraphics2002;22(Spec Issue):S61–S78.
  • 51 WangJC, Sone S, Feng L, et al. Rapidly growing small peripheral lung cancers detected by screening CT: correlation between radiological appearance and pathological features. Br J Radiol2000;73:930–937.
  • 52 TakashimaS, Sone S, Li F, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M, Kadoya M. Indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules revealed at populations-based CT screening of the lung: using first follow-up diagnostic CT to differentiate benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol2003;180:1255–1263.
  • 53 HeitzmanER, Markarian B, Raasch BN, et al. Pathways of tumor spread through the lung: radiologic correlations with anatomy and pathology. Radiology1982;144(1):3–14.
  • 54 YanoM, Arai T, Inagaki K, Morita T, Nomura T, Ito H. Intrapulmonary satellite nodule of lung cancer as a T factor. Chest1998;114:1305–1308.
  • 55 ByersTE, Vena JE, Rzepka TF. Predilection of lung cancer for the upper lobes: an epidemiologic inquiry. J Natl Cancer Inst1984;72:1271–1275.
  • 56 HyodoT, Kanazawa S, Dendo S, et al. Intrapulmonary lymph nodes: thin-section CT findings, pathological findings, and CT differential diagnosis from pulmonary metastatic nodules. Acta Med Okayama2004;58(5):235–240.
  • 57 QuintLE, Park CH, Iannettoni MD. Solitary pulmonary nodules in patients with extrapulmonary neoplasms. Radiology2000;217:257–261.
  • 58 ReadWL, Tierney RM, Page NC, et al. Differential prognostic impact of comorbidity. J Clin Oncol2004;22:3099–3103.
  • 59 BerlinL. Malpractice issues in radiology: failure to diagnose lung cancer—anatomy of a malpractice trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol2003;180:37–45.

Article History

Published in print: Nov 2005