"skipMainNavigation"
closeDrawerMenuopenDrawerMenu
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Original Research

    MR Imaging in Patients with Crohn Disease: Value of T2- versus T1-weighted Gadolinium-enhanced MR Sequences with Use of an Oral Superparamagnetic Contrast Agent

    Published Online:Feb 1 2006https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2381040244

    Abstract

    Purpose: To prospectively compare oral contrast-enhanced T2-weighted half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced fast low-angle shot (FLASH) MR and standard examinations in the evaluation of Crohn disease.

    Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Fifty-nine patients with Crohn disease underwent MR imaging after oral administration of a superparamagnetic contrast agent; RARE plain and fat-suppressed sequences and FLASH sequences were performed before and after intravenous injection of gadolinium chelate. References were endoscopic, small-bowel barium, computed tomographic, ultrasonographic, and clinical-biochemical scoring of disease activity. Two radiologists analyzed MR images for presence and extent of Crohn disease lesions, presence of strictures or other complications, and degree of local inflammation. MR findings were correlated with endoscopic, radiologic, and clinical data (κ statistic and Spearman rank correlation test).

    Results: T2-weighted MR was 95% accurate, 98% sensitive, and 78% specific for detection of ileal lesions. Agreement between T1- and T2-weighted images ranged from 0.77 for ileal lesions to 1.00 for colic lesions. T2-weighted MR enabled detection of 26 of 29 severe strictures, 17 of 24 enteroenteric fistulas, and all adhesions and abscesses; T1-weighted MR enabled detection of 20 of 29 severe strictures, 16 of 24 enteroenteric fistulas, and all adhesions and abscesses. Complications leading to surgery were found in 12 (20%) patients; these were assessed correctly with either T1- or T2-weighted images. T2-weighted signal intensities of the wall and mesentery correlated with biologic activity (P < .001, r of 0.774 and 0.712, respectively). Interobserver agreement was 0.642–1.00 for T2-weighted and 0.711–1.00 for T1-weighted images.

    Conclusion: T2-weighted MR can depict Crohn disease lesions and help assess mural and transmural inflammation with the same accuracy as gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR. Combination of gadolinium-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted sequences is useful in the assessment of Crohn disease.

    © RSNA, 2005

    Erratum in: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13134013

    References

    • 1 Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB, et al. A review of activity indices and efficacy endpoints for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2002; 122: 512–530. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 2 Brignola C, Lanfranchi GA, Campieri M, et al. Importance of laboratory parameters in the evaluation of Crohn's disease activity. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;8:245–248. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 3 Singleton JW. Clinical activity assessment in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32(12 suppl):42S–45S. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 4 Cellier C, Sahmoud T, Froguel E, et al; for the Groupe d'Etudes Therapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires Digestives. Correlations between clinical activity, endoscopic severity, and biological parameters in colonic or ileocolonic Crohn's disease: a prospective multicentric study of 121 cases. Gut 1994;35:231–235. Google Scholar
    • 5 Wills JS, Lobis IF, Denstman FJ. Crohn disease: state of the art. Radiology 1997;202:597–610. Link, Google Scholar
    • 6 Shoenut JP, Semelka RC, Magro CM, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy in distinguishing the type and severity of inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994;19:31–35. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 7 Kettritz U, Isaaks K, Warshauer DM, et al. Crohn disease: pilot study comparing MRI of the abdomen with clinical evaluation. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995;21:249–253. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 8 Rollandi GA, Martinoli C, Conzi R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the small intestine and colon in Crohn's disease. Radiol Med (Torino) 1996;91:81–85. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 9 Rieber A, Wruk D, Nussle K, et al. MRI of the abdomen combined with enteroclysis in Crohn disease using oral and intravenous Gd-DTPA. Radiologe 1998;38:23–28. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 10 Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, et al. Evaluation of Crohn's disease activity with MRI. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:219–228. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 11 Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, et al. Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 2002;222:652–660. Link, Google Scholar
    • 12 Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1325–1332. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 13 Schunk K. Small bowel magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002;13:409–425. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Laghi A, Borrelli O, Paolantonio P, et al. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum in children with Crohn's disease. Gut 2003;52:393–397. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 15 Maglinte DD, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, et al. Classification of small bowel Crohn's subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:285–303. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 16 Ernst O, Asselah T, Cablan X, et al. Breath-hold fast spin-echo MR imaging of Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:127–128. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 17 Madsen SM, Thomsen HS, Schlichting P, et al. Evaluation of treatment response in active Crohn's disease by low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 1999;24:232–239. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 18 Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. RadioGraphics 2001;21:S161–S172. Link, Google Scholar
    • 19 Maccioni F, Viscido A, Marini M, Caprilli R. MRI evaluation of Crohn's disease of the small and large bowel with the use of negative superparamagnetic oral contrast agents. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:384–393. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 20 Giovagnoni A, Fabbri A, Maccioni F. Oral contrast agents in MRI of the gastrointestinal tract. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:367–375. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 21 Madsen SM, Thomsen HS, Munkholm P, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease evaluated by low-field magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with endoscopy, 99mTc-HMPAO leucocyte scintigraphy, conventional radiography and surgery. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:307–316. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 22 Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P. MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2651–2658. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 23 Hahn PF, Stark DD, Lewis JM, et al. First clinical trial of a new superparamagnetic iron oxide for use as an oral gastrointestinal contrast agent in MR imaging. Radiology 1990;175:695–700. Link, Google Scholar
    • 24 Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, von Ritter C, et al. MRI of the small intestine with rapid MRI sequences in Crohn disease after enteroclysis with oral iron particles. Radiologe 1998;38:29–36. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 25 Born C, Nagel B, Leinsinger G, Reiser M. MRI with oral filling in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Radiologe 2003;43:34–42. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 26 Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, Herrmann K, et al. MRI in Crohn's disease after transduodenal contrast administration using negative oral MRI contrast media. Radiologe 2003;43:43–50. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 27 Gauldie J, Richards C. Systemic symptoms/acute phase response. In: Targen SP, Shanahan F, eds. Inflammatory bowel disease: from bench to bedside. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1994; 230–238. Google Scholar
    • 28 Quinn PG, Binion DG, Connors PJ. The role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Med Clin North Am 1994;78:1331–1352. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 29 Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, et al. Development of a Crohn's disease activity index: national cooperative Crohn's disease study. Gastroenterology 1976;70:439–444. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 30 Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW. Rederived values of the eight coefficients of the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI). Gastroenterology 1979;77:843–846. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 31 Meyers MA, McGuire PV. Spiral CT demonstration of hypervascularity in Crohn disease: “vascular jejunization of the ileum” or the “comb sign”. Abdom Imaging 1995;20:327–332. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 32 Lee JK, Marcos HB, Semelka RC. MR imaging of the small bowel using the RARE sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:1457–1463. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: 2006