Pulmonary Emphysema: Objective Quantification at Multi–Detector Row CT—Comparison with Macroscopic and Microscopic Morphometry

Purpose: To prospectively compare pulmonary function tests and helical computed tomographic (CT) indexes for quantifying pulmonary emphysema with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry.

Materials and Methods: The investigation was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from patients. Multi–detector row CT of the thorax was performed with simultaneous acquisition of four 1-mm sections in 80 patients (57 men, 23 women; age range, 38–79 years) referred for surgical resection of lung cancer. From the raw data, 1.25-mm-thick sections were reconstructed at 10-mm intervals. Relative areas of lung with attenuation coefficients lower than nine thresholds and eight percentiles of the distribution of attenuation coefficients were calculated. Relative areas and percentiles were compared with areas found macroscopically to have emphysema and with two microscopic indexes assessed on resected specimens. Pulmonary function tests were measured 24–48 hours before surgery. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between each set of CT data obtained with the nine tested thresholds and eight percentiles with macroscopic and microscopic measurements.

Results: For relative lung areas, the strongest correlation with macroscopy was observed with a threshold of −970 HU (r = 0.543, P < .001) and that with microscopy was observed at −960 and −970 HU, depending on the index considered (r = 0.592, P < .001 and r = −0.546, P < .001, respectively). For percentiles, 1st percentile showed the strongest correlation with both macroscopy (r = −0.463, P < .001) and microscopy (r = −0.573, P < .001; and r = 0.523, P < .001 for each microscopic measurement). Forced expiratory volume in 1 second and vital capacity ratio, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide, and each of the three CT indexes were complementary to predict microscopic indexes.

Conclusion: Relative lung areas with attenuation coefficients lower than −960 or −970 HU and 1st percentile are valid indexes to quantify pulmonary emphysema on multi–detector row CT scans.

© RSNA, 2006


  • 1 Madani A, Keyzer C, Gevenois PA. Quantitative computed tomography assessment of lung structure and function in pulmonary emphysema. Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 720–730. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bae KT, Slone RM, Gierada DS, Yusen RD, Cooper JD. Patients with emphysema: quantitative CT analysis before and after lung volume reduction surgery. Radiology 1997;203:705–714. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gierada DS, Yusen RD, Pilgram TK, et al. Repeatability of quantitative CT indexes of emphysema in patients evaluated for lung volume reduction surgery. Radiology 2001;220:448–454. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gierada DS, Yusen RD, Villanueva IA, et al. Patient selection for lung volume reduction surgery: an objective model based on prior clinical decisions and quantitative CT analysis. Chest 2000;117(4):991–998. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Nakano Y, Coxson HO, Bosan S, et al. Core to rind distribution of severe emphysema predicts outcome of lung volume reduction surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:2195–2199. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Newell JD, Hogg JC, Snider GL. Report of a workshop: quantitative computed tomography scanning in longitudinal studies of emphysema. Eur Respir J 2004;23:769–775. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dirksen A, Dijkman JH, Madsen F, et al. A randomized clinical trial of alpha(1)-antitrypsin augmented therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1468–1472. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dirksen A, Friis M, Olesen KP, Skovgaard LT, Sorensen K. Progress of emphysema in severe alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency as assessed by annual CT. Acta Radiol 1997;38:826–832. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Massaro GD, Massaro D. Retinoic acid treatment abrogates elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema in rats. Nat Med 1997;3:675–677. [Published correction appears in Nat Med 1997;3(7):805.] Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tepper J, Pfeiffer J, Aldrich M, et al. Can retinoic acid ameliorate the physiologic and morphologic effects of elastase instillation in the rat? Chest 2000;117(5 suppl 1):242S–244S. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hayhurst MD, MacNee W, Flenley DC, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema by computerised tomography. Lancet 1984;2:320–322. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hruban RH, Meziane MA, Zerhouni EA, et al. High resolution computed tomography of inflation-fixed lungs: pathologic-radiologic correlation of centrolobular emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:935–940. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Müller NL, Stapels CA, Miller RR, Abboud RJ. “Density mask”: an objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. Chest 1988;94:782–787. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gould GA, MacNee W, McLean A, et al. CT measurements of lung density in life can quantitate distal airspace enlargement: an essential defining feature of human emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:380–392. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gevenois PA, De Maertelaer V, De Vuyst P, Zanen J, Yernault JC. Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:653–657. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gevenois PA, De Vuyst P, De Maertelaer V, et al. Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:187–192. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bankier AA, De Maertelaer V, Keyzer C, Gevenois PA. CT of pulmonary emphysema: subjective assessment and objective quantification by densitometry and macroscopic morphometry. Radiology 1999;211:851–858. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Weder W, Thurnheer R, Stammberger U, Bürge M, Russi EW, Bloch KE. Radiological emphysema morphology is associated with outcome after surgical lung volume reduction. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:313–320. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mishima M, Hirai T, Itoh H, et al. Complexity of terminal airspace geometry assessed by lung computed tomography in normal subjects and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:8829–8834. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Vannier MW, Wang G. Principles of spiral CT. In: Remy-Jardin M, ed. Spiral CT of the chest. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1996; 1–32. Google Scholar
  • 21 The definition of emphysema. Report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Lung Diseases workshop. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;132:182–185. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Silverman PM, Kalender WA, Hazle JD. Common terminology for single and multislice helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1135–1136. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hartley PG, Galvin JR, Hunninghake GW, et al. High-resolution CT-derived measures of lung density are valid indexes of interstitial lung disease. J Appl Physiol 1994;76:271–277. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pederson OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows: report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal—official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl 1993;16:5–40. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cotes JE, Chinn DJ, Quanjer PH, Roca J, Yernault JC. Standardization of the measurement of transfer factor (diffusing capacity): report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal—official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl 1993;16:41–52. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gevenois PA, Koob MC, Jacobovitz D, De Vuyst P, Yernault JC, Struyven J. Whole lung sections for CT-pathologic correlations: modified Gough-Wentworth technique. Invest Radiol 1993;28:242–246. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Thurlbeck WM. Measurement of pulmonary emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1967;95:752–754. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rienmüller RK, Behr J, Kalender WA, et al. Standardized quantitative high resolution CT in lung diseases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:742–749. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2006