Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Search
  • Quick Search in Journals
  • Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Original Research

    Breast Disease: Clinical Application of US Elastography for Diagnosis

    Published Online:May 1 2006https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2391041676

    Abstract

    Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of real-time freehand elastography by using the extended combined autocorrelation method (CAM) to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions, with pathologic diagnosis as the reference standard.

    Materials and Methods: This study was approved by the University of Tsukuba Human Subjects Institutional Review Board; all patients gave informed consent. Conventional ultrasonography (US) and real-time US elastography with CAM were performed in 111 women (mean age, 49.4 years; age range, 27–91 years) who had breast lesions (59 benign, 52 malignant). Elasticity images were assigned an elasticity score according to the degree and distribution of strain induced by light compression. The area under the curve and cutoff point, both of which were obtained by using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, were used to assess diagnostic performance. Mean scores were examined by using a Student t test. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared by using the standard proportion difference test or the Δ-equivalent test.

    Results: For elasticity score, the mean ± standard deviation was 4.2 ± 0.9 for malignant lesions and 2.1 ± 1.0 for benign lesions (P < .001). When a cutoff point of between 3 and 4 was used, elastography had 86.5% sensitivity, 89.8% specificity, and 88.3% accuracy. When a best cutoff point of between 4 and 5 was used, conventional US had 71.2% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity, and 84.7% accuracy. Elastography had higher sensitivity than conventional US (P < .05). By using equivalence bands for noninferiority or equivalence, it was shown that the specificity of elastography was not inferior to that of conventional US and that the accuracy of elastography was equivalent to that of conventional US.

    Conclusion: For assessing breast lesions, US elastography with the proposed imaging classification, which was simple compared with that of the Breast Imaging Recording and Data System classification, had almost the same diagnostic performance as conventional US.

    © RSNA, 2006

    References

    • 1 Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 1997; 202: 79–86. Link, Google Scholar
    • 2 Shiina T, Doyley MM, Bamber JC. Strain imaging using combined RF and envelope autocorrelation processing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Savoy, Ill: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Digital Archive, 1996;2:1331–1336. Google Scholar
    • 3 Shiina T, Nitta N, Ueno E, Bamber JC. Real time tissue elasticity imaging using the combined autocorrelation method. J Med Ultrason 2002;29:119–128. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 4 Nitta N, Yamakawa M, Shiina T, Ueno E, Doyley MM, Bamber JC. Tissue elasticity imaging based on combined autocorrelation method and 3-D tissue model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Savoy, Ill: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Digital Archive, 1998;2:1447–1450. Google Scholar
    • 5 Yamakawa M, Shiina T. Strain estimation using the extended combined autocorrelation method. Jpn J Appl Phys 2001;40:3872–3876. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 6 American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), ultrasound. 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003. Available at: http://www.acr.org/s_acr/sec.asp?CID=882&DID=14550. Accessed September 8, 2004. Google Scholar
    • 7 Japanese Breast Cancer Society. General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer. 15th ed. Tokyo, Japan: Japanese Breast Cancer Society, 2002. Google Scholar
    • 8 Hughes LE. The ANDI concept and classification of benign breast disorders: an update. Br J Clin Pract Suppl 1989;68:1–6. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 9 Matsumura T, Tamano S, Mitake T, et al. Development of freehand ultrasound elasticity imaging system and in vivo results. In: Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on the Ultrasonic Measurement and Imaging of Tissue Elasticity. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester, 2002;1:80. Google Scholar
    • 10 Tango T. Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design. Stat Med 1998;17(8):891–908. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 11 Hiltawsky KM, Kruger M, Starke C, et al. Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:1461–1469. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 12 Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:427–435. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 13 Krouskop TA, Younes PS, Srinivasan S, Wheeler T, Ophir J. Differences in the compressive stress-strain response of infiltrating ductal carcinomas with and without lobular features: implications for mammography and elastography. Ultrason Imaging 2003;25:162–170. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissue under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998;20:260–274. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: 2006