Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Association between Clinical Features and MR Imaging Findings

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the association between clinical features and structural abnormalities found at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

Materials and Methods: The study was approved by the institutional medical ethics review board. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. MR images of the knee were obtained from 205 (42 [20%] men, 163 [80%] women; median age, 60 years; range, 43–77 years) patients in whom symptomatic OA at multiple joint sites was diagnosed. MR images were analyzed for various abnormalities of OA. All patients were interviewed concerning pain and stiffness in the knee that was imaged. Odds ratios (ORs) with 99% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to determine the association between the imaging findings and clinical features of OA.

Results: A large joint effusion was associated with pain (OR, 9.99; 99% CI: 1.28, 149) and stiffness (OR, 4.67; 99% CI: 1.26, 26.1). The presence of an osteophyte in the patellofemoral compartment (OR, 2.25; 99% CI: 1.06, 4.77) was associated with pain. All other imaging findings, including focal or diffuse cartilaginous abnormalities, subchondral cysts, bone marrow edema, subluxation of the meniscus, meniscal tears, or Baker cysts, were not associated with symptoms.

Conclusion: Findings of this study indicate that only two associations exist between clinical symptoms and structural findings found on MR images in patients with OA of the knee.

© RSNA, 2006

References

  • 1 Heppelmann B. Anatomy and histology of joint innervation. J Peripher Nerv Syst 1997; 2(1): 5–16. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dye SF, Vaupel GL, Dye CC. Conscious neurosensory mapping of the internal structures of the human knee without intraarticular anesthesia. Am J Sports Med 1998;26(6):773–777. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lawrence JS, Bremner JM, Bier F. Osteo-arthrosis: prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and x-ray changes. Ann Rheum Dis 1966;25(1):1–24. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hill CL, Gale DG, Chaisson CE, et al. Knee effusions, popliteal cysts, and synovial thickening: association with knee pain in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2001;28(6):1330–1337. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Felson DT, Chaisson CE, Hill CL, et al. The association of bone marrow lesions with pain in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med 2001;134(7):541–549. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Boegard T, Rudling O, Petersson IF, Jonsson K. Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the tibiofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57(7):401–407. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Boegard T, Rudling O, Petersson IF, Jonsson K. Correlation between radiographically diagnosed osteophytes and magnetic resonance detected cartilage defects in the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57(7):395–400. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Link TM, Steinbach LS, Ghosh S, et al. Osteoarthritis: MR imaging findings in different stages of disease and correlation with clinical findings. Radiology 2003;226(2):373–381. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hunter DJ, March L, Sambrook PN. The association of cartilage volume with knee pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003;11(10):725–729. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hill CL, Gale DR, Chaisson CE, et al. Periarticular lesions detected on magnetic resonance imaging: prevalence in knees with and without symptoms. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48(10):2836–2844. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Riyazi N, Meulenbelt I, Kroon HM, et al. Evidence for familial aggregation of hand, hip, and spine but not knee osteoarthritis in siblings with multiple joint involvement: the GARP study. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64(3):438–443. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kellgren JH, Lawrence RC. Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494–502. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kornaat PR, Ceulemans RY, Kroon HM, et al. MRI assessment of knee osteoarthritis: Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System (KOSS)—inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of a compartment-based scoring system. Skeletal Radiol 2005;34(2):95–102. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yulish BS, Montanez J, Goodfellow DB, Bryan PJ, Mulopulos GP, Modic MT. Chondromalacia patellae: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1987;164(3):763–766. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15 McCauley TR, Kornaat PR, Jee WH. Central osteophytes in the knee: prevalence and association with cartilage defects on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176(2):359–364. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mink JH, Deutsch AL. Occult cartilage and bone injuries of the knee: detection, classification, and assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1989;170(3 pt 1):823–829. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sowers MF, Hayes C, Jamadar D, et al. Magnetic resonance-detected subchondral bone marrow and cartilage defect characteristics associated with pain and x-ray-defined knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003;11(6):387–393. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Creamer P, Hunt M, Dieppe P. Pain mechanisms in osteoarthritis of the knee: effect of intraarticular anesthetic. J Rheumatol 1996;23(6):1031–1036. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Likar R, Schafer M, Paulak F, et al. Intraarticular morphine analgesia in chronic pain patients with osteoarthritis. Anesth Analg 1997;84(6):1313–1317. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bhattacharyya T, Gale D, Dewire P, et al. The clinical importance of meniscal tears demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A(1):4–9. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Recht M, Bobic V, Burstein D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;391(suppl):S379–S396. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Peterfy CG. Scratching the surface: articular cartilage disorders in the knee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2000;8(2):409–430. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Eckstein F, Reiser M, Englmeier KH, Putz R. In vivo morphometry and functional analysis of human articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: from image to data, from data to theory. Anat Embryol (Berl) 2001;203(3):147–173. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Vincken PW, ter Braak BP, van Erkel AR, et al. Effectiveness of MR imaging in selection of patients for arthroscopy of the knee. Radiology 2002;223(3):739–746. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167(1):127–132. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG, et al. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172(4):1073–1080. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gold GE, McCauley TR, Gray ML, Disler DG. What's new in cartilage? RadioGraphics 2003;23(5):1227–1242. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hargreaves BA, Gold GE, Beaulieu CF, Vasanawala SS, Nishimura DG, Pauly JM. Comparison of new sequences for high-resolution cartilage imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;49(4):700–709. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kornaat PR, Doornbos J, van der Molen AJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20(5):850–856. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Biedert RM. Treatment of intrasubstance meniscal lesions: a randomized prospective study of four different methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2000;8(2):104–108. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: June 2006