Virtual Autopsy: Preliminary Experience in High-Velocity Gunshot Wound Victims

Purpose: To retrospectively assess virtual autopsy performed with multidetector computed tomography (CT) for the forensic evaluation of gunshot wound victims.

Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and did not require informed consent of the next of kin. Thirteen consecutive male gunshot wound victims (mean age, 27 years) were scanned with 16-section multidetector CT prior to routine autopsy. Retrospectively, the total-body nonenhanced scans were interpreted at a three-dimensional workstation by radiologists blinded to autopsy findings. Images were evaluated for lethal wound, number and location of wound tracks, injured structures, and metal fragment location. After image review, autopsy reports and photographs were compared with the images and interpretations to validate the multidetector CT determinations.

Results: Multidetector CT aided in correct identification of all lethal wounds, and metallic fragment location was always precise. In four cases, multidetector CT aided in accurate assessment of organ injuries and lethal wounds but led to underestimation of the number of wounds if comingling paths occurred. In two cases of a chest wound, multidetector CT aided in accurate assessment of the chest as having the lethal wound but failed to help identify specific sites of hemorrhage. In two cases of craniofacial injury, the path of the wound was not clear. Autopsy revealed a total of 78 wound tracks (mean, 6; range, 1–24). Ten (13%) wound tracks were not identified at multidetector CT (six upper extremity wounds and four thigh wounds). In two cases, findings missed at autopsy (fracture of the cervical spine, bullet fragments in the posterior area of the neck) were identified at multidetector CT.

Conclusion: Multidetector CT can aid prediction of lethal wounds and location of metallic fragments.

References

  • 1 Brogdon BG. Forensic radiology. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC, 1998.
  • 2 Fatteh AV, Mann GT. The role of radiology in forensic pathology. Med Sci Law 1969; 9: 27–30.
  • 3 Mann GT, Fatteh AB. The role of radiology in the identification of human remains: report of a case. J Forensic Sci Soc 1968;8:67–68.
  • 4 Thali MJ, Yen K, Schweitzer W, et al. Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:386–403.
  • 5 Di Maio VJM. Gunshot wounds: practical aspects of firearms, ballistics, and forensic techniques. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC, 1999.
  • 6 Thali MJ, Yen K, Vock P, et al. Image-guided virtual autopsy findings of gunshot victims performed with multi-slice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent correlation between radiology and autopsy findings. Forensic Sci Int 2003;138:8–16.
  • 7 Donchin Y, Rivkind AI, Bar-Ziv J, Hiss J, Almog J, Drescher M. Utility of postmortem computed tomography in trauma victims. J Trauma 1994;37:552–555.
  • 8 Wallace SK, Cohen WA, Stern EJ, Reay DT. Judicial hanging: postmortem radiographic CT, and MR imaging features with autopsy confirmation. Radiology 1994;193:263–267.
  • 9 Thali MJ, Schweitzer W, Yen K, et al. New horizons in forensic radiology: the 60-second digital autopsy-full-body examination of a gunshot victim by multislice computed tomography. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2003;24:22–27.

Article History

Published in print: Aug 2006