Screening for Colorectal Neoplasia with CT Colonography: Initial Experience from the 1st Year of Coverage by Third-Party Payers

Published Online:Nov 1 2006https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2412052007

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate our experience in the 1st year of computed tomographic (CT) colonography screening since the initiation of local third-party payer coverage.

Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. Over a 1-year period that ended on April 27, 2005, 1110 consecutive adults (585 women, 525 men; mean age, 58.1 years) underwent primary CT colonography screening. More than 99% were covered by managed care agreements. CT colonographic interpretation was performed with primary three-dimensional polyp detection, and the final results were issued within 2 hours. Patients with large (≥10-mm) polyps were referred for same-day optical colonoscopy, and patients with medium-sized (6–9-mm) lesions had the option of immediate optical colonoscopy or short-term CT colonography surveillance.

Results: Large colorectal polyps were identified at CT colonography in 43 (3.9%) of 1110 patients. Medium-sized lesions were identified in 77 (6.9%) patients, 31 (40%) of whom chose optical colonoscopy and 46 (60%) of whom chose CT colonography surveillance. Concordant lesions were identified in 65 of 71 patients who underwent subsequent optical colonoscopy (positive predictive value, 91.5%). Sixty-one (86%) of 71 optical colonoscopic procedures were performed on the same day as CT colonography, thereby avoiding the need for repeat bowel preparation. The actual endoscopic referral rate for positive findings at CT colonography was 6.4% (71 of 1110 patients). The demand for CT colonography screening from primary care physicians and their patients increased throughout the study period.

Conclusion: As a primary colorectal screening tool, CT colonography covered by third-party payers has an acceptably low endoscopic referral rate and a high concordance of positive findings at optical colonoscopy.

References

1 Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191–2200.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
2 Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004;291:1713–1719.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
3 Rockey DC, Paulsen EK, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005;365:305–311.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
4 Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Johnson GL, et al. Building a CT colonography program: necessary ingredients for reimbursement and clinical success. Radiology 2005;235:17–20.
Google Scholar
5 Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB, et al. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology 2004;127:1661–1677.
Google Scholar
6 Jemal A, Taylor M, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:10–30.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
7 Barnes E. HMO pays for screening virtual colonoscopy. AuntMinnie Web site. http://www.auntminnie.com. Accessed June 4, 2004.
Google Scholar
8 Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ. Extracolonic findings identified in asymptomatic adults at screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:718–728.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
9 Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH. Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(6):1491–1496.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
10 Pickhardt PJ. Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions at CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). RadioGraphics 2004;24:1535–1556.
Google Scholar
11 Pickhardt PJ. Virtual colonoscopy for primary screening: the future is now. Minerva Chir 2005;60:139–150.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
12 Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, McFarland EG, Taylor AJ. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays. Radiology 2005;236:872–878.
Google Scholar
13 Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3–9.
Google Scholar
14 Bond JH. Clinical relevance of the small colorectal polyp. Endoscopy 2001;33:454–457.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
15 Pickhardt PJ. CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for primary colorectal screening: challenges facing clinical implementation. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:1–4.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
16 Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed at optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:352–359.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
17 van Gelder, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004;127:41–48.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
18 Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rate for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004;127:452–456.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
19 Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 1997;112:17–23.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
20 Bond JH. Update on colorectal polyps: management and follow-up surveillance. Endoscopy 2003;35(suppl):S35–S40.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
21 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002;12:1–9.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
22 Pickhardt PJ. Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1599–1606.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
23 Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR. Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls encountered with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:799–805.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
24 Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004;127:1300–1311.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
25 Pickhardt PJ. CT colonography without catharsis: the ultimate study or useful additional option? Gastroenterology 2005;128:521–522.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
26 Pickhardt PJ. Virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer [reply]. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1148–1150.
Google Scholar
27 Pickhardt PJ. Limitations of virtual colonoscopy [reply]. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:155.
Google Scholar
28 Radiological Society of North America. CTC trial adds more fuel to ongoing debate. RSNA News [newsletter] 2005;15:5–6.
Google Scholar
29 Hur C, Gazelle CS, Zalis ME, Podolsky DK. Analysis of the potential impact of computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) on colonoscopy demand. Gastroenterology 2004;127:1312–1321.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
30 Levin TR. Colonoscopy capacity: can we build it? will they come? Gastroenterology 2004;127:1841–1844.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
31 Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA, Hofer TP, Fendrick AM. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:507–515.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
32 Odom SR, Duffy SD, Barone JE, Ghevariya V, McClane SJ. The rate of adenocarcinoma in endoscopically removed colorectal polyps. Am Surg 2005;71:1024–1026.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
33 Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Larsen S, Osnes M. Growth of colorectal polyps: recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps of less than 10 mm, 1 year after detection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994;29:640–645.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
34 Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN, et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of 3 years. Gut 1996;39:449–456.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
35 Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber AG. National Polyp Study data evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer 2004;111:633–639.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
36 Knoernschild HE. Growth rate and malignant potential of colonic polyps: early results. Surg Forum 1963;14:137–138.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
37 Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2005;129:1832–1844.
MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2006

Vol. 241, No. 2

Metrics

Altmetric Score

PDF download