"skipMainNavigation"
closeDrawerMenuopenDrawerMenu
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Original Research

    Vertebral Marrow Fat Content and Diffusion and Perfusion Indexes in Women with Varying Bone Density: MR Evaluation

    Published Online:Dec 1 2006https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2413051858

    Abstract

    Purpose: To prospectively study the relationship among vertebral marrow fat content, marrow diffusion indexes, and marrow and erector spinae muscle perfusion indexes in female subjects with varying bone mineral density.

    Materials and Methods: Institutional study approval and informed consent were obtained. Dual x-ray absorptiometry, proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy, diffusion-weighted MR imaging, and dynamic contrast material–enhanced MR imaging of the lumbar spine and erector spinae muscle were performed in 110 women (mean age, 73 years; range, 67–84 years). Marrow fat content, marrow apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and perfusion indexes (maximum enhancement and enhancement slope) of marrow and erector spinae muscle were compared among three bone density groups (normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic). The t test comparisons and Pearson correlations were applied.

    Results: Seven subjects were excluded, which yielded a final cohort of 103 subjects: 18 with normal bone density, 30 with osteopenia, and 55 with osteoporosis. Vertebral marrow fat content was significantly increased in the osteoporotic group (67.8% ± 8.5 [standard deviation]) when compared with that of the normal bone density group (59.2% ± 10.0, P = .002). Vertebral marrow perfusion indexes were significantly decreased in the osteoporotic group (enhancement slope, 1.10%/sec ± 0.51) compared with those of the osteopenic group (1.45%/sec ± 0.51, P = .01) and normal bone density group (1.70%/sec ± 0.52, P < .001). Erector spinae muscle perfusion indexes did not decrease as bone density decreased. The ADC of vertebral marrow did not change with bone density.

    Conclusion: The subjects experienced a decrease in vertebral marrow maximum enhancement and enhancement slope and an increase in marrow fat content as bone density decreased. The reduction in perfusion indexes occurred only within the vertebral body and not in the paravertebral tissues supplied by the same artery.

    © RSNA, 2006

    References

    • 1 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001; 285: 785–795. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 2 Lentle BC, Prior JC. Osteoporosis: what a clinician expects to learn from a patient's bone density examination. Radiology 2003;228:620–628. Link, Google Scholar
    • 3 Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis—introduction. Osteoporos Int 1998;8(suppl 4):S7–S80. Google Scholar
    • 4 Shih TT, Liu HW, Chang CJ, Wei SY, Shen LC, Yang PC. Correlation of MR lumbar bone marrow perfusion with bone mineral density in female subjects. Radiology 2004;233:121–128. Link, Google Scholar
    • 5 Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Antonio GE, Wong SYS, Lau EM, Leung PC. Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in normal and osteoporotic males: analysis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR and MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2005;236:945–951. Link, Google Scholar
    • 6 Chen WT, Shih T, Chen RC, et al. Vertebral bone marrow perfusion evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: significance of aging and sex. Radiology 2001;220:213–218. Link, Google Scholar
    • 7 Schellinger D, Lin CS, Fertikh D, et al. Normal lumbar vertebrae: anatomic, age, and sex variance in subjects at proton MR spectroscopy—initial experience. Radiology 2000;215:910–916. Link, Google Scholar
    • 8 Lynn HS, Lau EM, Au B, Leung PC. Bone mineral density reference norms for Hong Kong Chinese. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:1663–1668. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 9 Assessment of risk fracture and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994;843:1–129. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 10 Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137–1148. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 11 Yeung DK, Wong SY, Griffith JF, Lau EM. Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis: evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:222–228. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 12 Williams A, Newell RLM, Collins P. Back and macroscopic anatomy of the spinal cord. In: Standring S, ed. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39th ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Elsevier, 2005; 734–776. Google Scholar
    • 13 Kato H, Hasegawa M, Takada T, Torii S. The lumbar artery perforator based island flap: anatomical study and case reports. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:541–546. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Shih TT, Chang CJ, Tseng WY, et al. Effect of calcium channel blockers on vertebral bone marrow perfusion of the lumbar spine. Radiology 2004;231:24–30. Link, Google Scholar
    • 15 Parker GJ, Suckling J, Tanner SF, et al. Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:564–574. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 16 Cova M, Kang YS, Tsukamoto H, et al. Bone marrow perfusion evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic fast MR imaging in a dog model. Radiology 1991;179:535–539. Link, Google Scholar
    • 17 Whitney C, Warburton DE, Frohlich J, Chan SY, McKay H, Khan K. Are cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis directly linked? Sports Med 2004;34:779–807. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 18 Hamerman D. Osteoporosis and atherosclerosis: biological linkages and the emergence of dual-purpose therapies. QJM 2005;98:467–484. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 19 Browner WS, Seeley DG, Vogt TM, Cummings SR. Non-trauma mortality in elderly women with low bone mineral density: study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 1991;338:355–358. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 20 Kiel DP, Kauppila LI, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, O'Donnell CJ, Wilson PW. Bone loss and the progression of abdominal aortic calcification over a 25 year period: the Framingham Heart Study. Calcif Tissue Int 2001;68:271–276. [Published correction appears in Calcif Tissue Int 2004;74:208.] Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 21 Barengolts EI, Berman M, Kukreja SC, Kouznetsova T, Lin C, Chomka EV. Osteoporosis and coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1998;62:209–213. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 22 Wong SY, Kwok T, Woo J, et al. Bone mineral density and the risk of peripheral arterial disease in men and women: results from Mr. and Ms Os, Hong Kong. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:1933–1938. Google Scholar
    • 23 Samuels A, Perry MJ, Gibson RL, Colley S, Tobias JH. Role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in estrogen-induced osteogenesis. Bone 2001;29:24–29. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 24 Crock HV, Yoshizawa H. The blood supply of the lumbar vertebral column. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;115:6–21. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 25 Ratcliffe JF. The arterial anatomy of the adult human lumbar vertebral body: a microarteriographic study. J Anat 1980;131:57–79. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 26 Armour KE, Armour KJ, Gallagher ME, et al. Defective bone formation and anabolic response to exogenous estrogen in mice with targeted disruption of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Endocrinology 2001;142:760–766. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 27 Chen WT, Ting-Fang Shih T, Hu CJ, Chen RC, Tu HY. Relationship between vertebral bone marrow blood perfusion and common carotid intima-media thickness in aging adults. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:811–816. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 28 Bare S, Recker S, Recker R, Kimmel D. Influence of alendronate on periosteal and endocortical bone formation in the ilium of osteoporotic women [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:S96. Google Scholar
    • 29 Schellinger D, Lin CS, Hatipoglu HG, Fertikh D. Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1620–1627. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 30 Luypaert R, Boujraf S, Sourbron S, Osteaux M. Diffusion and perfusion MRI: basic physics. Eur J Radiol 2001;38:19–27. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 31 Sterck JG, Klein-Nulend J, Lips P, Burger EH. Response of normal and osteoporotic human bone cells to mechanical stress in vitro. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 1998;274:E1113–E1120. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 32 Rubin C, Recker R, Cullen D, Ryaby J, McCabe J, McLeod K. Prevention of post-menopausal bone loss by a low magnitude, high frequency mechanical stimuli: a clinical trial assessing compliance, efficacy and safety. J Bone Miner Res 2004;19:343–351. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 33 Baur A, Dietrich O, Reiser M. Diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow: current status. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1699–1708. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: 2006