"skipMainNavigation"
closeDrawerMenuopenDrawerMenu
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Original Research

    Five-year Lung Cancer Screening Experience: CT Appearance, Growth Rate, Location, and Histologic Features of 61 Lung Cancers

    Published Online:Feb 1 2007https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422052090

    Abstract

    Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the computed tomography (CT)-determined size, morphology, location, morphologic change, and growth rate of incidence and prevalence lung cancers detected in high-risk individuals who underwent annual chest CT screening for 5 years and to evaluate the histologic features and stages of these cancers.

    Materials and Methods: The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was waived. CT scans of 61 cancers (24 in men, 37 in women; age range, 53–79 years; mean, 65 years) were retrospectively reviewed for cancer size, morphology, and location. Forty-eight cancers were assessed for morphologic change and volume doubling time (VDT), which was calculated by using a modified Schwartz equation. Histologic sections were retrospectively reviewed.

    Results: Mean tumor size was 16.4 mm (range, 5.5–52.5 mm). Most common CT morphologic features were as follows: for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) (n = 9), ground-glass attenuation (n = 6, 67%) and smooth (n = 3, 33%), irregular (n = 3, 33%), or spiculated (n = 3, 33%) margin; for non-BAC adenocarcinomas (n = 25), semisolid (n = 11, 44%) or solid (n = 12, 48%) attenuation and irregular margin (n = 14, 56%); for squamous cell carcinoma (n = 14), solid attenuation (n = 12, 86%) and irregular margin (n = 10, 71%); for small cell or mixed small and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 7), solid attenuation (n = 6, 86%) and irregular margin (n = 5, 71%); for non–small cell carcinoma not otherwise specified (n = 5), solid attenuation (n = 4, 80%) and irregular margin (n = 3, 60%); and for large cell carcinoma (n = 1), solid attenuation and spiculated shape (n = 1, 100%). Attenuation most often (in 12 of 21 cases) increased. Margins most often (in 16 of 20 cases) became more irregular or spiculated. Mean VDT was 518 days. Thirteen of 48 cancers had a VDT longer than 400 days; 11 of these 13 cancers were in women.

    Conclusion: Overdiagnosis, especially in women, may be a substantial concern in lung cancer screening.

    © RSNA, 2007

    References

    • 1 Diederich S, Wormanns D, Heindel W. Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Eur J Radiol 2003; 45(1): 2–7. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 2 Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 2002;222(3):773–781. Link, Google Scholar
    • 3 Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165(4):508–513. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 4 Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby D, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: the first ten years. Cancer J 2002;8(suppl 1):S47–S54. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 5 Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003;226(3):756–761. Link, Google Scholar
    • 6 Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: 5-year prospective experience. Radiology 2005;235(1):259–265. Link, Google Scholar
    • 7 Schwartz M. A biomathematical approach to clinical tumor growth. Cancer 1961;14:1272–1294. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 8 Usuda K, Saito Y, Sagawa M, et al. Tumor doubling time and prognostic assessment of patients with primary lung cancer. Cancer 1994;74(8):2239–2244. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 9 Hasegawa M, Sone S, Takashima S, et al. Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol 2000;73(876):1252–1259. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 10 Beasley MB, Brambilla E, Travis WD. The 2004 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors. Semin Roentgenol 2005;40(2):90–97. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 11 Muhm JR, Miller WE, Fontana RS, et al. Lung cancer detected during a screening program using 4-month chest radiographs. Radiology 1983;148(3):609–615. Link, Google Scholar
    • 12 Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Fagerstrom RM, et al. Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92(16):1308–1316. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 13 Yankelevitz DF, Kostis WJ, Henschke CI, et al. Overdiagnosis in chest radiographic screening for lung carcinoma: frequency. Cancer 2003;97(5):1271–1275. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Heelan RT, Flehinger BJ, Melamed MR, et al. Non–small-cell lung cancer: results of the New York screening program. Radiology 1984;151(2):289–293. Link, Google Scholar
    • 15 Garland LH. Bronchial carcinoma: lobar distribution of lesions in 250 cases. Calif Med 1961;94:7–8. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 16 Macfarlane JC, Doughty BJ, Crosbie WA. Carcinoma of the lung: an analysis of 362 cases diagnosed and treated in 1 year. Br J Dis Chest 1962;56:57–63. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 17 Byers TE, Vena JE, Rzepka TF. Predilection of lung cancer for the upper lobes: an epidemiologic inquiry. J Natl Cancer Inst 1984;72(6):1271–1275. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 18 Chute CG, Greenberg ER, Baron J, et al. Presenting conditions of 1539 population-based lung cancer patients by cell type and stage in New Hampshire and Vermont. Cancer 1985;56(8):2107–2111. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 19 Quinn D, Gianlupi A, Broste S. The changing radiographic presentation of bronchogenic carcinoma with reference to cell types. Chest 1996;110(6):1474–1479. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 20 Woodring JH, Stelling CB. Adenocarcinoma of the lung: a tumor with a changing pleomorphic character. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;140(4):657–664. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: 2007