Intracranial Aneurysms: Role of Multidetector CT Angiography in Diagnosis and Endovascular Therapy Planning

Purpose: To evaluate the sensitivity of 16-detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography in diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms and to determine whether multidetector CT angiography provides sufficient diagnostic information to guide endovascular treatment, with combined imaging and clinical data as the reference standard.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Eighty-seven patients clinically suspected of having subarachnoid hemorrhage underwent multidetector CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Aneurysm detection with multidetector CT angiography and DSA was analyzed on a per-patient and a per-aneurysm basis. For each aneurysm deemed ruptured on multidetector CT angiograms, the same multidetector CT angiography data set was used to determine whether the aneurysm was suitable for endovascular coil placement or whether a neurosurgical procedure was preferable. Criteria were based on neck width in relation to aneurysm size and the presence of vessels originating from the aneurysm. Results were compared with actual treatment that had been performed in each aneurysm after full diagnostic work-up, including DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for aneurysm presence were determined.

Results: The reference standard revealed 84 aneurysms in 63 patients. Multidetector CT angiography was used to correctly identify 62 of 63 patients with 80 of 84 aneurysms and to correctly rule out aneurysms in 24 patients. DSA was used to correctly identify 62 of 63 patients with 79 of 84 aneurysms and to correctly rule out aneurysms in 23 patients. Per patient, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, for presence of aneurysm(s) were 98%, 100%, 100%, and 96% for multidetector CT angiography and 98%, 100%, 98%, and 96% for DSA. Per aneurysm, the possibility of coil embolization was correctly assessed with multidetector CT angiography in 69 (93%) of 74 target aneurysms for acute occlusive treatment.

Conclusion: Multidetector CT angiography offers high diagnostic accuracy—equivalent to that of DSA—in the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Also, the possibility of coil embolization can be reliably determined with multidetector CT angiography.

© RSNA, 2007


  • 1 Mayberg MR, Batjer HH, Dacey R, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 1994; 25: 2315–2328. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE. Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1999;30:317–320. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401–1407. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Aoki S, Sasaki Y, Machida T, Ohkubo T, Minami M. Cerebral aneurysms: detection and delineation using 3-D-CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:1115–1120. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Harbaugh RE, Schlusselberg DS, Jeffery R, Hayden S, Cromwell LD, Pluta D. Three-dimensional computerized tomography angiography in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease. J Neurosurg 1992;76:408–414. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Alberico RA, Patel M, Casey S, Jacobs B, Maguire W, Decker R. Evaluation of the circle of Willis with three-dimensional CT angiography in patients with suspected intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1571–1578. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dorsch NW, Young N, Kingston RJ, Compton JS. Early experience with spiral CT in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1995;36:230–236. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Alberico RA, Ozsvath R, Casey S, Patel M. Helical CT angiography for the detection of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1002–1003. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Brown JH, Lustrin ES, Lev MH, Ogilvy CS, Taveras JM. Characterization of intracranial aneurysms using CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:889–893. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Anderson GB, Findlay JM, Steinke DE, Ashforth R. Experience with computed tomographic angiography for the detection of intracranial aneurysms in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1997;41:522–527. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chappell ET, Moure FC, Good MC. Comparison of computed tomographic angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2003;52:624–631. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ohkawa M, Tanabe M, Toyama Y, et al. CT angiography with helical CT in the assessment of acute stage of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Radiat Med 1998;16:91–97. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pedersen HK, Bakke SJ, Hald JK, et al. CTA in patients with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage: a comparative study with selective, digital angiography and blinded, independent review. Acta Radiol 2001;42:43–49. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 White PM, Teasdale EM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V. Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection—prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort. Radiology 2001;219:739–749. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–1274. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–817. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Brassel F, Rademaker J, Haupt C, Becker H. Intravascular stent placement for a fusiform aneurysm of the posterior cerebral artery: case report. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1250–1253. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wanke I, Doerfler A, Schoch B, Stolke D, Forsting M. Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a self-expanding stent system: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1192–1199. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Han P, McDougall CG. Preliminary experience using the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2004;54:6–16. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Alfke K, Straube T, Dorner L, Mehdorn HM, Jansen O. Treatment of intracranial broad-neck aneurysms with a new self-expanding stent and coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:584–591. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 White PM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V. Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms? a systematic review. Radiology 2000;217:361–370. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ertl-Wagner B, Hoffmann RT, Bruning R, Reiser MF. CT angiographic evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a review of the literature and first experiences with 4- and 16-slice multi detector CT scanners [in German]. Radiologe 2002;42:892–897. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jayaraman MV, Mayo-Smith WW, Tung GA, et al. Detection of intracranial aneurysms: multi-detector row CT angiography compared with DSA. Radiology 2004;230:510–518. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 24 van Gelder JM. Computed tomographic angiography for detecting cerebral aneurysms: implications of aneurysm size distribution for the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. Neurosurgery 2003;53:597–605. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mallouhi A, Felber S, Chemelli A, et al. Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: comparison of volume-rendering and maximum-intensity-projection algorithms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:55–64. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Anderson GB, Steinke DE, Petruk KC, Ashforth R, Findlay JM. Computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for the diagnosis and early treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1999;45:1315–1320. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Boet R, Poon WS, Lam JM, Yu SC. The surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms based on computer tomographic angiography alone: streamlining the acute mananagement of symptomatic aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:101–105. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dehdashti AR, Rufenacht DA, Delavelle J, Reverdin A, de Tribolet N. Therapeutic decision and management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage based on computed tomographic angiography. Br J Neurosurg 2003;17:46–53. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2007