Solitary Brain Lesions Enhancing at MR Imaging: Evaluation with Fluorine 18–Fluorocholine PET

Purpose: To prospectively determine whether differences between benign and malignant brain lesions can be depicted with fluorine 18 (18F) fluorocholine positron emission tomography (PET).

Materials and Methods: Thirty consecutive patients (14 women, 16 men; age range, 26–79 years) with solitary brain lesions that were enhanced at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging underwent whole-brain 18F-fluorocholine PET after giving informed consent in this institutional review board–approved, HIPAA-compliant study. Histopathologic diagnoses were made in 24 cases (13 high-grade gliomas, eight metastases to the brain, and three benign lesions). In six cases, benign lesions were diagnosed on the basis of longitudinal follow-up MR findings. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for lesion and peritumoral regions was measured on PET images, and a lesion-to–normal tissue uptake ratio (LNR) was calculated. Differences were assessed with one-way analysis of variance, Fisher exact, and Student t tests.

Results: Differences in SUVmax between high-grade gliomas (1.89 ± 0.78 [mean ± standard deviation]), metastases (4.11 ± 1.68), and benign lesions (0.59 ± 0.31) were significant (P < .0001). LNRs also differed significantly (5.15 ± 2.51, 10.91 ± 2.14, and 1.28 ± 0.32, respectively; P < .0001). These differences were also significant at pairwise analysis. The peritumoral LNR exceeded 2.0 in seven high-grade gliomas and no metastases (P = .02). In 14 radiation-treated patients, the lesions classified as benign demonstrated significantly less uptake compared with the recurrent tumors (SUVmax: 0.72 ± 0.38 vs 2.27 ± 1.24, P < .01; LNR: 1.36 ± 0.43 vs 5.88 ± 3.66, P < .01).

Conclusion: High-grade gliomas, metastases, and benign lesions can be distinguished on the basis of measured fluorocholine uptake. Increased peritumoral fluorocholine uptake is a distinguishing characteristic of high-grade gliomas.

© RSNA, 2007

References

  • 1 Enzinger C, Strasser-Fuchs S, Ropele S, Kapeller P, Kleinert R, Fazekas F. Tumefactive demyelinating lesions: conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging. Mult Scler 2005; 11(2): 135–139.
  • 2 Law M, Meltzer DE, Cha S. Spectroscopic magnetic resonance imaging of a tumefactive demyelinating lesion. Neuroradiology 2002;44(12):986–989.
  • 3 Kwee SA, Coel MN, Lim J, Ko JP. Combined use of F-18 fluorocholine positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for brain tumor evaluation. J Neuroimaging 2004;14(3):285–289.
  • 4 Kelly PJ, Daumas-Duport C, Scheithauer BW, Kall BA, Kispert DB. Stereotactic histologic correlations of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance imaging-defined abnormalities in patients with glial neoplasms. Mayo Clin Proc 1987;62(6):450–459.
  • 5 Sijens PE, Knopp MV, Brunetti A, et al. 1H MR spectroscopy in patients with metastatic brain tumors: a multicenter study. Magn Reson Med 1995;33(6):818–826.
  • 6 Fulham MJ, Bizzi A, Dietz MJ, et al. Mapping of brain tumor metabolites with proton MR spectroscopic imaging: clinical relevance. Radiology 1992;185(3):675–686.
  • 7 Alger JR, Frank JA, Bizzi A, et al. Metabolism of human gliomas: assessment with H-1 MR spectroscopy and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Radiology 1990;177(3):633–641.
  • 8 Shinoura N, Nishijima M, Hara T, et al. Brain tumors: detection with C-11 choline PET. Radiology 1997;202(2):497–503.
  • 9 Hara T, Kosaka N, Shinoura N, Kondo T. PET imaging of brain tumor with [methyl-11C]choline. J Nucl Med 1997;38(6):842–847.
  • 10 Hara T, Kondo T, Kosaka N. Use of 18F-choline and 11C-choline as contrast agents in positron emission tomography imaging-guided stereotactic biopsy sampling of gliomas. J Neurosurg 2003;99(3):474–479.
  • 11 DeGrado TR, Baldwin SW, Wang S, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of (18)F-labeled choline analogs as oncologic PET tracers. J Nucl Med 2001;42(12):1805–1814.
  • 12 Ramirez de Molina A, Rodriguez-Gonzalez A, Gutierrez R, et al. Overexpression of choline kinase is a frequent feature in human tumor-derived cell lines and in lung, prostate, and colorectal human cancers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002;296(3):580–583.
  • 13 Lim J, Dorman E, Cabral C. Automated production of [18F]FECh and [18F]FCH: preparation and use of [18F]fluoroalkane sulfonates and fluoroalkylation agents [abstr]. J Label Comput Radiopharm 2003;46(S1):S46.
  • 14 Law M, Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, Arnett J, Litt AW. High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. Radiology 2002;222(3):715–721.
  • 15 Moller-Hartmann W, Herminghaus S, Krings T, et al. Clinical application of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the diagnosis of intracranial mass lesions. Neuroradiology 2002;44(5):371–381.
  • 16 Chiang IC, Kuo YT, Lu CY, et al. Distinction between high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases using peritumoral 3-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion, and perfusion imagings. Neuroradiology 2004;46(8):619–627.
  • 17 Ohtani T, Kurihara H, Ishiuchi S, et al. Brain tumour imaging with carbon-11 choline: comparison with FDG PET and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28(11):1664–1670.
  • 18 Burtscher IM, Skagerberg G, Geijer B, Englund E, Stahlberg F, Holtas S. Proton MR spectroscopy and preoperative diagnostic accuracy: an evaluation of intracranial mass lesions characterized by stereotactic biopsy findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21(1):84–93.
  • 19 Goebell E, Paustenbach S, Vaeterlein O, et al. Low-grade and anaplastic gliomas: differences in architecture evaluated with diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology 2006;239(1):217–222.
  • 20 Provenzale JM, McGraw P, Mhatre P, Guo AC, Delong D. Peritumoral brain regions in gliomas and meningiomas: investigation with isotropic diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232(2):451–460.
  • 21 Wyss MT, Weber B, Honer M, et al. 18F-choline in experimental soft tissue infection assessed with autoradiography and high-resolution PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31(3):312–316.
  • 22 Spaeth N, Wyss MT, Weber B, et al. Uptake of 18F-fluorocholine, 18F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine, and 18F-FDG in acute cerebral radiation injury in the rat: implications for separation of radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence. J Nucl Med 2004;45(11):1931–1938.
  • 23 Douglas JG, Stelzer KJ, Mankoff DA, et al. [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for targeting radiation dose escalation for patients with glioblastoma multiforme: clinical outcomes and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64(3):886–891.
  • 24 Tralins KS, Douglas JG, Stelzer KJ, et al. Volumetric analysis of 18F-FDG PET in glioblastoma multiforme: prognostic information and possible role in definition of target volumes in radiation dose escalation. J Nucl Med 2002;43(12):1667–1673.

Article History

Published in print: 2007