Intraindividual Comparison of High-Spatial-Resolution Abdominal MR Angiography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Initial Experience
Abstract
Purpose: To prospectively compare three-dimensional (3D) contrast material–enhanced abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 1.5 and 3.0 T intraindividually in healthy volunteers.
Materials and Methods: After institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained, 15 healthy male volunteers (age range, 24–41 years) underwent one abdominal 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiographic examination each at 1.5 and 3.0 T in random order. Fast 3D gradient-echo sequence with parallel imaging acceleration factor of three was used for MR angiography; acquired spatial resolutions were 1 × 0.8 × 1 mm3 (imaging time, 19 seconds) at 1.5 T and 0.9 × 0.8 × 0.9 mm3 (imaging time, 18 seconds) at 3.0 T. With the latter, volume of the 3D slab was 8% larger. At 1.5 T, 20-mL bolus of gadobenate dimeglumine was delivered at 2 mL/sec; at 3.0 T, 15-mL bolus was delivered at 2.5 mL/sec. Two blinded radiologists rated image quality of aorta and proximal renal arteries in consensus with five-point scale (4 = very good, 0 = nondiagnostic) according to sequence and in direct intraindividual comparison. Visibility of proximal and segmental renal arteries was rated with three-point scale (3 = completely visible, 1 = nonvisible). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was determined with phantoms. For statistical analysis of the SNRs, t tests were used.
Results: All MR angiographic measurements were diagnostic. Median score for image quality at both field strengths was 4. Depiction of proximal renal arteries was rated 3 at both field strengths. The visibility of the distal renal arteries was better at 3.0 T (median score, 3) than at 1.5 T (median score, 2). With direct comparison, 3.0-T MR angiography was better in 14 of 15 cases; no field strength was preferred in the other case. Mean SNR was significantly (P < .001) higher at 3.0 T (17.8 ± 0.09 [standard deviation]) than at 1.5 T (11.9 ± 0.10).
Conclusion: MR angiography at 3.0 T provided better vessel visibility and SNR than did that at 1.5 T, although voxel size and imaging time were reduced.
© RSNA, 2007
References
- 1
Leiner T - 2
Schoenberg SO - 3
Michaely HJ - 4
Vasbinder GB - 5
Hoogeveen RM - 6
Schoenberg SO - 7
Vasbinder GB - 8
Slovut DP - 9
Campeau NG - 10
de Bazelaire CM - 11
Rohrer M - 12
Michaely HJ - 13
Krautmacher C - 14
Araoz PA - 15
Zech CJ - 16
Lee VS - 17
Nael K - 18
Willinek WA - 19
Chen Q - 20
Goyen M - 21
Schmidt MA - 22
Wilman AH