Published Online:Oct 1 2007https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451062005
References
- 1
, Schernthaner RE, Bankier AA, et al. JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality. Radiology 2006; 240: 869–877. Link, Google ScholarRingl H - 2
, Skaleric U, Likar B. The impact of image information on compressibility and degradation in medical image compression. Med Phys 2006; 33: 2832–2838. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarFidler A - 3
, Likar B, Skaleric U. Lossy JPEG compression: easy to compress, hard to compare. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 67–73. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarFidler A - 4 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for the submission of premarket notifications for medical image management devices. Rockville, Md: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2000; 16. Google Scholar
- 5
, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC, Geraets WG. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 6–12. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarJanhom A - 6
. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948; 27: 379–424, 623–656. Google ScholarShannon CE







