Minor Head Injury: Guidelines for the Use of CT—A Multicenter Validation Study

Purpose: To prospectively and externally validate published national and international guidelines for the indications of computed tomography (CT) in patients with a minor head injury.

Materials and Methods: The study protocol was institutional review board approved. All patients implicitly consented to use of their deidentified data for research purposes. Between February 2002 and August 2004, data were collected in consecutive adult patients with blunt minor head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13–14 or 15) and a risk factor for neurocranial traumatic complications at presentation at four Dutch university hospitals. Primary outcome was any neurocranial traumatic CT finding. Secondary outcomes were clinically relevant traumatic CT findings and neurosurgical intervention. Sensitivity and specificity of each guideline for all outcomes and the number of patients needed to scan to detect one outcome (ie, the number of patients needed to undergo CT to find one patient with a neurocranial traumatic CT finding, a clinically relevant traumatic CT finding, or a CT finding that required neurosurgical intervention) were estimated.

Results: Data were available for 3181 patients. Only the European Federation of Neurological Societies guidelines reached a sensitivity of 100% for all outcomes. Specificity was 0.0%–0.5%. The Dutch guidelines had the lowest sensitivity (76.5%) for neurosurgical interventions. The best specificities for traumatic CT findings and neurosurgical interventions were reached with the criteria proposed by the United Kingdom National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (46.1% and 43.6%, respectively), albeit at relatively low sensitivities (82.1% and 94.1%, respectively). The number of patients needed to scan ranged from six to 13 for traumatic CT findings and from 79 to 193 for neurosurgical interventions.

Conclusion: All validated guidelines demonstrated a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. The lowest number of patients needed to scan for either of the outcomes was reached with the NICE criteria.

Supplemental material: radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2452061509/DC1

© RSNA, 2007


  • 1 Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Peloso PM, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med 2004; 43(suppl): 28–60. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Holm L, Kraus J, Coronado VG. Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med 2004;43(suppl):113–125. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001;357:1391–1396. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 af Geijerstam JL, Britton M. Mild head injury: mortality and complication rate—meta-analysis of findings in a systematic literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:843–850. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fabbri A, Servadei F, Marchesini G, et al. Prospective validation of a proposal for diagnosis and management of patients attending the emergency department for mild head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:410–416. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Borg J, Holm L, Cassidy JD, et al. Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med 2004;43(suppl):61–75. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 2000;343:100–105. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Miller EC, Holmes JF, Derlet RW. Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients. J Emerg Med 1997;15:453–457. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Glauser J. Head injury: which patients need imaging? which test is best? Cleve Clin J Med 2004;71:353–357. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stein SC, Ross SE. The value of computed tomographic scans in patients with low-risk head injuries. Neurosurgery 1990;26:638–640. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Stein SC, Ross SE. Mild head injury: a plea for routine early CT scanning. J Trauma 1992;33:11–13. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG, et al. External validation of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005;294:1519–1525. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005;294:1511–1518. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Vos PE, Battistin L, Birbamer G, et al. EFNS guideline on mild traumatic brain injury: report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2002;9:207–219. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Los RK, van Ginneken AM, de Wilde M, van der Lei J. OpenSDE: row modeling applied to generic structured data entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:162–165. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ibanez J, Arikan F, Pedraza S, et al. Reliability of clinical guidelines in the detection of patients at risk following mild head injury: results of a prospective study. J Neurosurg 2004;100:825–834. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Little RJ. Regression with missing X's: a review. J Am Stat Assoc 1992;87:1227–1237. Google Scholar
  • 18 Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1087–1091. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Little RJ, Rubin DB. Quick methods for multivariate data with missing values. In: Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: Wiley, 1987; 39–49. Google Scholar
  • 20 Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. In: Methodology in the social sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guildford, 1998; 74–77. Google Scholar
  • 21 van der Heijden GJ, Donders AR, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1102–1109. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Twijnstra A, Brouwer O, Keyser A, et al. Richtlijnen voor diagnostiek en behandeling van patiënten met een licht schedel-hersenletsel [Guidelines for diagnosis and management of patients with minor head injury]. Dutch Association of Neurology. Published 2001. Accessed December 15, 2006. Google Scholar
  • 23 Servadei F, Teasdale G, Merry G. Defining acute mild head injury in adults: a proposal based on prognostic factors, diagnosis, and management. J Neurotrauma 2001;18:657–664. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Yates D, Breen K, Brennan P, et al; for the Guideline Development Group. Head injury: triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Web site. http://www.nice.org.uk/. Published June 25, 2003. Accessed March 17, 2005. Google Scholar
  • 25 Teasdale G, Gentleman D, Andrews P, et al; for the Guideline Development Group. Early management of patients with head injury. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/46/index.html; http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/published/index.html. Published August 2000. Updated December 11, 2001. Accessed April 17, 2005. Google Scholar
  • 26 Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B, Kock-Jensen C. Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injuries. J Trauma 2000;48:760–766. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fabbri A, Servadei F, Marchesini G, et al. Clinical performance of NICE recommendations versus NCWFNS proposal in patients with mild head injury. J Neurotrauma 2005;22:1419–1427. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Dunning J, Lecky F. The NICE guidelines in the real world: a practical perspective. Emerg Med J 2004;21:404–407. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 af Geijerstam JL, Britton M. Mild head injury: reliability of early computed tomographic findings in triage for admission. Emerg Med J 2005;22:103–107. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hunink MG. Decision making in the face of uncertainty and resource constraints: examples from trauma imaging. Radiology 2005;235:375–383. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dunning J, Stratford-Smith P, Lecky F, et al. A meta-analysis of clinical correlates that predict significant intracranial injury in adults with minor head trauma. J Neurotrauma 2004;21:877–885. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2007