Pulmonary Nodule Volume: Effects of Reconstruction Parameters on Automated Measurements—A Phantom Study

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate in a phantom the effects of reconstruction kernel, field of view (FOV), and section thickness on automated measurements of pulmonary nodule volume.

Materials and Methods: Spherical and lobulated pulmonary nodules 3–15 mm in diameter were placed in a commercially available lung phantom and scanned by using a 16-section computed tomographic (CT) scanner. Nodule volume (V) was determined by using the diameters of 27 spherical nodules and the mass and density values of 29 lobulated nodules measured by using the formulas V = (4/3)πr3 (spherical nodules) and V = 1000 · (M/D) (lobulated nodules) as reference standards, where r is nodule radius; M, nodule mass; and D, wax density. Experiments were performed to evaluate seven reconstruction kernels and the independent effects of FOV and section thickness. Automated nodule volume measurements were performed by using computer-assisted volume measurement software. General linear regression models were used to examine the independent effects of each parameter, with percentage overestimation of volume as the dependent variable of interest.

Results: There was no substantial difference in the accuracy of volume estimations across the seven reconstruction kernels. The bone reconstruction kernel was deemed optimal on the basis of the results of a series of statistical analyses and other qualitative findings. Overall, volume accuracy was significantly associated (P < .0001) with larger reference standard–measured nodule diameter. There was substantial overestimation of the volumes of the 3–5-mm nodules measured by using the volume measurement software. Decreasing the FOV facilitated no significant improvement in the precision of lobulated nodule volume measurements. The accuracy of volume estimations—particularly those for small nodules—was significantly (P < .0001) affected by section thickness.

Conclusion: Substantial, highly variable overestimation of volume occurs with decreasing nodule diameter. A section thickness that enables the acquisition of at least three measurements along the z-axis should be used to measure the volumes of larger pulmonary nodules.

© RSNA, 2008

References

  • 1 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Detection Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354: 99–105. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003; 226: 756–761. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005; 237: 395–400. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Reeves AP, Chan AB, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI, Kressler B, Kostis WJ. On measuring the change in size of pulmonary nodules. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006; 25: 435–450. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Yankelevitz DF, Gupta R, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT—preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 212: 561–566. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sirohey S. Lung VCAR: a technical description. GE Healthcare Web site, 2005. http://www.gehealthcare.com/usen/ct/clin_app/docs/9754WhtPprTech_4.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2007. Google Scholar
  • 7 Honda O, Sumikawa H, Johkoh T, et al. Computer-assisted lung nodule volumetry from multi-detector row CT: influence of image reconstruction parameters. Eur J Radiol 2007; 62: 106–113. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ko JP, Rusinek H, Jacobs EL, et al. Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT—phantom study. Radiology 2003; 228: 864–870. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Goo JM, Tongdee T, Tongdee R, Yeo K, Hildebolt CF, Bae KT. Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi–detector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy. Radiology 2005; 235: 850–856. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kostis WJ, Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Fluture SC, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. Radiology 2004; 231: 446–452. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Petrou M, Quint LE, Nan B, Baker LH. Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 306–312. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Meyer CA, et al. Effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations. Radiology 2003; 229: 184–194. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Zhao B, Schwartz LH, Moskowitz CS, et al. Pulmonary metastases: effect of CT section thickness on measurement—initial experience. Radiology 2005; 234: 934–939. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Goo JM, Kim KG, Gierada DS, Castro M, Bae KT. Volumetric measurements of lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: effect of changes in lung volume. Korean J Radiol 2006; 7: 243–248. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ko JP, Marcus R, Bomsztyk E, et al. Effect of blood vessels on measurement of nodule volume in a chest phantom. Radiology 2006; 239: 79–85. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bolte H, Riedel C, Jahnke T, et al. Reproducibility of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 28–35. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2008